Strat Posted May 14, 2012 Posted May 14, 2012 Wow, same as Splave's submission o_O really impressed by efficiency! Did you used a special tweak or just random run? Quote
Splave Posted May 14, 2012 Posted May 14, 2012 (edited) ancient Japanese secret I see that you have found it as well. Great run! Edited May 14, 2012 by Splave Quote
Hondacity Posted May 14, 2012 Posted May 14, 2012 (edited) Found! low voltage = better score bingo Edited May 14, 2012 by Hondacity Quote
M.Beier Posted May 14, 2012 Posted May 14, 2012 Found low voltage then better score Thermal throttling? Quote
Hondacity Posted May 14, 2012 Posted May 14, 2012 why would it be thermal throttling...its full pot. Quote
Splave Posted May 14, 2012 Posted May 14, 2012 Found low voltage then better score I get credit for this right? lmao Honda I think the chips are more efficient with a smaller delta between core and pot. Less voltage less heat.. Quote
Hondacity Posted May 14, 2012 Posted May 14, 2012 Its not called thermal throttling though. Thermal throttling is a safety mechanism. At this temperatures and high voltage its another thing. I don't remember the term lol. Quote
M.Beier Posted May 14, 2012 Posted May 14, 2012 Its not called thermal throttling though. Thermal throttling is a safety mechanism. At this temperatures and high voltage its another thing. I don't remember the term lol. Thermal throttling does not have to be at what you consider high temperature.... And honestly, has Intel only made one fluck up with Ivy??? I can think of 2 already... 1) TIM has 1/8th conductivity 2) Some Intel staff, wanted to sue half of the review sites globally, and especially overclockers 'leaking' - but as usual, hollow preaching, balls to follow up on the big words wasnt present. BUT; I agree with the evil minded Dutchman, nice find. Quote
Hondacity Posted May 14, 2012 Posted May 14, 2012 Its called saturation point. All switching transistor exhibit this when they are pushed at their limit. Quote
M.Beier Posted May 15, 2012 Posted May 15, 2012 Its called saturation point. All switching transistor exhibit this when they are pushed at their limit. Oh man, damn you, now I wont just have to study for exams, saturation point I'm going to follow up on ;-) Cheers though. Quote
Hondacity Posted May 15, 2012 Posted May 15, 2012 while you're at it read intel's white paper on thermal throttling Quote
Gyrock Posted May 15, 2012 Posted May 15, 2012 I thought I would have posted the comment below just after my previous comment(#3), but did not; " I think this could be a bug-run, cos I can't reproduce the same level of score afterwards. I will delete this submission in some hours" So I think low voltage doesn't matter at all for this result at least. Quote
Hondacity Posted May 15, 2012 Posted May 15, 2012 I don't think its a bugged run. Splave's efficiency is close. It could be transistor q changes with temp and degrading thermal paste between ihs and die. Quote
Splave Posted May 15, 2012 Posted May 15, 2012 I thought I would have posted the comment below just after my previous comment(#3), but did not; " I think this could be a bug-run, cos I can't reproduce the same level of score afterwards. I will delete this submission in some hours" So I think low voltage doesn't matter at all for this result at least. hey mate I have scores leading up to this and it was reproducible for me Quote
I.M.O.G. Posted May 15, 2012 Posted May 15, 2012 I don't think its a bugged run either. Lots of ways to screw up wprime runs, and a few ways to make a good score slightly better than another at the same frequency. Quote
Gyrock Posted May 15, 2012 Posted May 15, 2012 Hi splave-san! So you found something, congrats:) And I haven't yet... Anyway I'll do what I said:D hey mate I have scores leading up to this and it was reproducible for me Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.