http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731749

Nothing on the screen ?

demiurg, thanks for those SPi 32M scores (you know what I mean)! )

But what about this? frebrez received both scores..

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637225

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636553

 

Please check this.

 

fixed

This user:

http://hwbot.org/user.do?userId=6067

Have a lot of wrong results please do something!!

Example:

X1800 XT and X1800GTO2 dont show the especific model only the "X1800 Series" from 3DM.

 

GMA950: no image, no screenshot, no link, no nothing!!!

 

And a lot of results are the same wrong.

This user is a joke!!

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731677

wrong result - it's not PCMark 2005 score, it's 3DMarks score http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727378 . And the screenshot is not sufficient information

Because of the fact my wPrime scores with v.1.58 were deleted, you should delete this result, too: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714606

It's 1.60, not 1.55 like hwbot wants...

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731549

 

Needs to be moved - this is like a fat chick in the miss universe contest:D

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731677 no proof, bad screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728419 screen doesn't show cpu

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727924 screen cover lap time

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731744 no proof, bad screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731737 no proof, bad screen

 

fixed

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729699 not enought proof

 

fixed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731549

 

Needs to be moved - this is like a fat chick in the miss universe contest:D

 

fixed

Wrong category

 

"Go 7600 GT" in "7600 Go" list

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580585

wrong wprime version after 1.1.08

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=715144 1.54

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697128 1.43

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698155 1.58

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697129 1.43

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699121 1.43

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699123 1.43

wprime wrong version after 1.1.08

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720434 1.61

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720455 1.61

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698104 1.58

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721048 1.61

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721030 1.61

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697459 1.58

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=724427 1.61

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721044 1.61

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708604 1.58

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731489 not enought proof, no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731988 bad screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731991 bad screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729812 bad screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729810 bad screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732867 move from9200 PRO to 9200

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732850 move from9200 PRO to 9200

wrong wprime version after 1.1.08

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697128 1.43

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697129 1.43

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699121 1.43

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699123 1.43

 

huch I bench this again, with 1300Mhz more than you and can go to the old place

Wrong category

 

"Go 7600 GT" in "7600 Go" list

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580585

 

fixed

huch I bench this again, with 1300Mhz more than you and can go to the old place

 

Good for you,but use correct wprime this time

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732470 wrong category, fix pls. 915 posted as 845

wrong wprime version after 1.1.08

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=715144 1.54

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697128 1.43

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698155 1.58

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697129 1.43

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699121 1.43

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699123 1.43

 

fixed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729438 - E6850 posted as T5250

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729434 - E8400 as T5470

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729439 - E8400 as T5500

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729436 - duplicated result above, E8400 as T5500 - I checked their forum, the guy quoted previous score

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729437 - T7500 as E2220

wrong wprime version (1.54) after 01/01/08

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690046

Wrong Score

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732643 3DMark'05's score in PCMark'05

 

Check and fix it, please

non-1.55 wPrime after 1/1/08

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695571

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687043

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686927

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684465

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707354

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707353

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=724201

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567829 - invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=563238 - invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570267 - invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572061 - invalid checksum

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674735 - invalid checksum

 

Please check'em all...

Please, check these results:

1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674418

- Verification link is not valid

2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681012

- No resolution on the screenshot

3. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673229

- Invalid screenshot

4. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661571

- No resolution on the screenshot

Please, check these results:

 

1.http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732442

- Almost 600% OC with a notebook?

 

2.All results from http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=12631 with a pentium 1 processor.

- All pentium 1 processor have the same Revision and Stepping, i think it`s the same processor for all results.

so what about this? http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=19849&postcount=1915

malefic Fess

Be patient, mods have real life too