o polonos Posted November 12, 2007 Share Posted November 12, 2007 o polonosIMHO you should make your job more carefully! Only IM moderator ? Report one score and im gonna fix it .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted November 12, 2007 Share Posted November 12, 2007 will ANYBODY FIX IT: 2 more links - Cel433 slot1 - but results for s370 user - Quentj (JMax-Hardware) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=632593 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=633046 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxhound Posted November 12, 2007 Share Posted November 12, 2007 I can't submit my result with penryn QX9650 because I have the same score as stoolman at super pi 1m (http://img91.imageshack.us/img91/8871/foxroxorhh3.png) plz help me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 o polonus I can not report the score because it is already checked by you. 05 Aug 2007 09:05 created botservice scanned by bot on forum 01 Sep 2007 11:49 reported kim55 reported by user due to wrong hardware match () 18 Sep 2007 05:39 modified o polonos manually modified by moderator (o polonos) - reason: no reason given 18 Sep 2007 05:40 checked (crew) o polonos checked by a moderator (moved to right cathegory ) 18 Sep 2007 05:40 modified o polonos manually modified by moderator (o polonos) - reason: no reason given That is why I asked you be more carefully. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 Hello all, i have an problem, two submissions of my team for very good time at SuperPi 1m was deleted (7.953 and 8.109s). Maybe can you think that we used the same processor for all these result, but it's false ! We have test 8 Penryn QX9650 :woot: Please, rehabilitate the results which are due to us, thank you :ws: Thanks you for the image dami1. The problem is the results feature the exact same format screen shot - apparently done by the same person. Having the processors is helpful but does not show the user(s) in question actually did the benching alone. The results we're also submitted on the same day. It seems rather clear they we're done during a team bench session and in that case the results should not be posted to individual user accounts, instead they should be posted under the jmax_oc Team account only. If you have any further information about this we are happy to take another look maxi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 will ANYBODY FIX IT: 2 more links - Cel433 slot1 - but results for s370 user - Quentj (JMax-Hardware) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=632593 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=633046 Sorry potapicus, there appears to be a glitch happening here. It will take some research to find out why this is happening, the edit's do not take. maxi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 It's OK now potapicus, you can relax Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 Yeahhhhh!!!!!!! Thanks!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
debauer Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 hi, http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626204 The result is a Celeron and not a Pentium 4. Thank you. I want my 1. Place Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted November 13, 2007 Share Posted November 13, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=664628 unblock plz. I can't send 2001mark verification file. ORB not work(only 2001) 2 or 3 days. http://service.futuremark.com/servlet/Index?pageid=/orb/projectdetails&XLID=9287096&UID=12082026&projectType=6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 hi, http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626204 The result is a Celeron and not a Pentium 4. Thank you. I want my 1. Place Fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
debauer Posted November 14, 2007 Share Posted November 14, 2007 Fixed. THX Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikiiioo Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=659280 wrong card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted November 16, 2007 Share Posted November 16, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=659280 wrong card Look at the score! 8800GTS can not do such miserable score That is 7300GS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted November 17, 2007 Share Posted November 17, 2007 hey guys, i think i found a paintmaster - cheater look this http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577815 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576582 CPUZ Say C2D E6500 but in the middle iss a free Place - a big hole i think it´s a C2D E4600 here iss the same Problem, but in the right Categorie http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=664971 i think the user Horrorwood cheats http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=7320 at this CPU here iss my CPU :battle: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted November 17, 2007 Share Posted November 17, 2007 Maybe it's because he uses an OLD Cpu-z V.1.35 ...... Why your cpu-z say at the top "E6500" and in the middle "E4600".... ?... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted November 17, 2007 Share Posted November 17, 2007 yes it´s an old version but i don´t have the hole in the middle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxine Posted November 17, 2007 Share Posted November 17, 2007 COWIE (1st WR pcmark05): Some people use 6800 PCI-X results in the 6800 APG category.... If im not mistake..NV41 is PCI-X..... http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=5&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=GeForce+6800+Agp+%28171%29&cpu=&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1184&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints= You can see an E6850 4.0Gz with it...but the only motherboard for 775 and AGP is 4CoreDual-VSTA or 4CoreDual-SATA2 wich can´t pass 350 in the FSB...(359 is the WR for this mobo). ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The same for this guy (V|ALDY), 1st WR 3dmark03 All of us knows that mobo Lanparty UT (939) haven´t AGP slot...so, please move to the correct category.... http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=2&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=GeForce+6800+Agp+%28171%29&cpu=&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1184&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints= -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Other guy with more than FSB>359 (remember Asrock 775 + agp is the only exist mobo), under suspice PCI-X in the AGP categ. He no show mobo, because of course, it´s an PCI-X card.... http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=1&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=GeForce+6800+Agp+%28171%29&cpu=&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1184&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints= ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Here the same cheaters in AQUAMARK....the 1st and 2th positions are PCI-X cards (note the 3th is CORRECT with an 4CoreDual-VSTA and AGP card). http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=10&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=GeForce+6800+Agp+%28171%29&cpu=&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=1184&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints= ------------------------------------------------------------- I think a CPU-Z showing mobo,cpu and memory must be mandatory for upload any result. Also in AQ3. Please not cheat, hwbot it´s a comunity for compare hardware and a great OC community. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 Your Links are incorrect, but It give´s DFI Lanparty UT with AGP - i have it LANPARTY UT nF3 250Gb The Asrock Mainboard can be Clock higher over mod´s with bridges on the Backsite you can Clock it up to FSB 350 and more than 1,6 Volt - my Asrock Board run with X6800EE FSB 300 multi 12 without Problems. Fix the result links an we can see the Problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=656287 wrong screen,wrong card Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lunatic@98 Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 Maybe it's because he uses an OLD Cpu-z V.1.35 ...... Why your cpu-z say at the top "E6500" and in the middle "E4600".... ?... yes it´s an old version but i don´t have the hole in the middle. hmm, my question: Why he have on this screen (MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSE4 EM64T) and by his own CPUz vali (MMX SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 EM64T) ? http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=107830 This is the same CPUz version Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
foxhound Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 Hi I can't submit my score with QX9650 @ 5698Mhz the screen: help me plz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dami1stm Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 Great score which Team JMax-Hardware sees amputating since + one week, it would indeed be to be able to solve the problem. I had post here even (it seems to me) a photo with 8 QX9650 tested by the team. :ws: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxine Posted November 18, 2007 Share Posted November 18, 2007 Collection of wrong results....mainly Nvidia 6800 PCX in AGP categ. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ This is an Opteron 144 (socket 939) in a Lanparty NF4-D running an 6800AGP card (see ORB link) THIS MOBO NOT HAVE AGP SLOT.....so, please move to the correct category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661112 This is an PCI-X 6800 in an AGP categ....NV41 (see rivatuner) is PCX if i´m not mistake... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=653104 Another PCX in AGP categ...see his sign (Abit ip35-pro + 6800GS)....THIS MOBO HAVENT AGP. So it´s clear it´s an PCX in the AGP categ. Please, move to the correct categ. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656979 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656695 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bwana, i have also the 4CoredDual-SATA2 with ALL mods possible....this mobo can do 350-370 max (the record is 359, i saw an screenshot of this).....See this results doing more than 450 x 9...do you really think this is posible in a SATA2/VSTA...i think is a no-no.....suspice 6800PCX in AGP categ...none of the following URLs supply a CPU-Z showing mobo or any sign of AGP card.... 7 x 460 .... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656711 9 x 451 ....you must calculate ( aq3, e6850 at 4060Mhz) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652154 9 x 430 .... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=651721 I dont know any motherboard with the 775 slot and AGP slot other than SATA2/VSTA...and like i said can´t pass 370 fsb...so they must have a SUPER-UNKNOW motherboard or they simply cheat.... If you can give me some screenshot of a SATA2/VSTA doing more than 380 fsb i will invite you to some good german beer!, . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted November 19, 2007 Share Posted November 19, 2007 it´s right i think the same t your post - block it and the mods must work Asrock board iss right - never over 400 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts