MaSell Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602652 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602653 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602654 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602656 Everywhere hidden full gfx name. It can be x550 non se, because of much higher scores than others. One screen with hidden name can be ok, but 4 screens and same mistake? Also check this: http://img215.imageshack.us/my.php?image=raportyn4.jpg http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=53623&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=53631&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=53628&thumb=false Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manieq Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659771 12k on r9550 in 3d mark 03? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted October 29, 2007 Share Posted October 29, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632569 XP Mobile in normal XP - wrong category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=568910 Barton 3200 posted as Barton 2500 - wrong category Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer (inactive) Posted October 30, 2007 Share Posted October 30, 2007 needs more proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660728 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660729 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660730 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660624 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656910 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659352 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659436 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659670 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660005 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bartx Posted October 30, 2007 Share Posted October 30, 2007 I found a few scores, which are matched wrong: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634725 And all results from tzwrtzhs's on E6300 added to E2160. He has a lot of scores in this category on E6300 - it isn't only one mistake. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634495 Another score from tzwrtzhs's. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636258 Maybe now is the time, when for wPrime screen should be also necessary, not only validation, because on the screen everything is visible - some people have problems with matching to correct category. Needs more proof: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641382 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572523 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=596665 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted October 30, 2007 Share Posted October 30, 2007 Hey.......What's going on here?..... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660760 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bartx Posted October 30, 2007 Share Posted October 30, 2007 WOW! Faster than QX9650 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramona Posted October 30, 2007 Share Posted October 30, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=660833 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=660834 Those are WRONG results!! How i can removed those Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepek86 Posted October 30, 2007 Share Posted October 30, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660831 wrong category.CPU is Brisbane, not Windsor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o polonos Posted October 30, 2007 Share Posted October 30, 2007 Guys please stop duplicate your reports ONE REPORT per score its enough You can se if one score was reported already Take a look on history 6! reports from the same user. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted October 30, 2007 Share Posted October 30, 2007 Hey.......What's going on here?..... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660760 I quote myself......... EDIT: The action was FASTER than my quote.......... . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o polonos Posted October 30, 2007 Share Posted October 30, 2007 I quote myself......... . It's fixed already Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted October 30, 2007 Share Posted October 30, 2007 I think that he insists........ :p http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660841 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o polonos Posted October 30, 2007 Share Posted October 30, 2007 Hey.......What's going on here?..... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660760 This score is fixed already I think that he insists........ :p http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=660841 . Here you give me diffrent link Both fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted October 30, 2007 Share Posted October 30, 2007 o polonos - whats about me? http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost....&postcount=637 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kolian Posted October 30, 2007 Share Posted October 30, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654583 look at this result, (http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=5554182), how can Radeon X550 get 466.5fps in 3DMark's 03 GT2 - Battle of Proxycon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted October 30, 2007 Crew Share Posted October 30, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659991 1.)"the benchmark was not run using default settings." 2.) card and resolution not visible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manieq Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659771 It' fake. Look at the fps. And it's impossible to do 12k on 9550. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaJ0r Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 Sorry, screenshot for this result was sent incorrect by mistake. Corrected, please, rescan him and add. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaSell Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661141 Should be 19min, not 9min Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaJ0r Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 I forgot to leave this http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659859. Please check result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepek86 Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652243 don't show a score Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaSell Posted October 31, 2007 Share Posted October 31, 2007 http://hwbot.org/user.do?userId=8370 His 6600 and 6600GT scores. Same frequency, nearly same scores (because of more cpu mhz). Take a look, it's VERY interesting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted November 1, 2007 Share Posted November 1, 2007 @ o polonos when i report a entry with the bell, nothing goes on i give alert when Wrong CPU, you look but not more Some one post Semperon at mobile CPU other other mistakes. and my Verifiction pics too small and blocked i don´t understand this rules. i can only upload 300 kb and this is to small when i cut the picture say other problems. i search now the wrong cpu and you see what i mean. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benito Posted November 1, 2007 Share Posted November 1, 2007 today My result was deleted why? I entered again all data (sorry 4 my english) 3 dmark06 18954 Verification http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=3590893 link screen : http://www.pcxtreme.it/forum/imagehosting/1784729d0656e385.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts