demiurg Posted February 27, 2008 Share Posted February 27, 2008 wrong category. Should be move to this http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1578 Brisbane http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700021 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701885 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690085 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693171 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690154 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690392 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690172 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690088 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699396 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699407 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699378 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted February 27, 2008 Crew Share Posted February 27, 2008 wrong card. in the compare-link you can clearly see it's a intel 945GM card and not a 845g. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702412 no resolution info http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698244 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702000 pls fix Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted February 27, 2008 Share Posted February 27, 2008 lol!!!! added http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1296 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted February 27, 2008 Share Posted February 27, 2008 The following results that Nordling posted are not in the right category ... He has posted in the X1650 agp category, while using a X1650 pci-e card ... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701989 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701990 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701991 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701992 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701993 I think it's quite obvious, 'cause he is using a P5E3 WS Pro, a motherboard that's it's commonly known supports only pci-e VGAs, and not AGP ones Take a look at his photos too ... In GPU-Z it's stated : I'm not implementing that Nordling did it on purpose btw Just, that he is clearly mistaken ... fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted February 27, 2008 Share Posted February 27, 2008 wrong card. in the compare-link you can clearly see it's a intel 945GM card and not a 845g. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702412 no resolution info http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698244 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702000 pls fix fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George_o/c Posted February 27, 2008 Share Posted February 27, 2008 Thanks a zillion times guys ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted February 27, 2008 Share Posted February 27, 2008 ..maybe this time,pls http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=694660 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689538 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680560 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675901 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693030 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=695914 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697936 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693345 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697928 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=692353 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696320 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689494 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693026 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697930 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693339 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680136 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=695909 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689521 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=679546 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=692743 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=625838 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=671409 wrong resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=580696 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668984 wrong resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=661480 wrong resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=674334 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=674269 hmm... http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696559 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696448 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696002 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696164 wrong pifast http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=643993 no verification http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680115 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=670737 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=659795 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=683508 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=600765 not enough proof http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=600762 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patagonian Posted February 27, 2008 Share Posted February 27, 2008 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689123 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569839 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590180 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583802 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562420 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683937 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622755 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683943 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622756 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699336 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602819 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605558 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632447 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610865 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697094 orblink broken http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588495 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588503 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=522515 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=526500 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610307 Tnx for fixit! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted February 28, 2008 Share Posted February 28, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=694660http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689538 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680560 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675901 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693030 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=695914 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697936 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693345 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697928 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=692353 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696320 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689494 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693026 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697930 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693339 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680136 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=695909 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689521 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=679546 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=692743 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=625838 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=671409 wrong resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=580696 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668984 wrong resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=661480 wrong resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=674334 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=674269 hmm... fixed 2 remarks: 1. Please next time provide result links, not compare urls; 2. If there is valid ORB link, whether unimportantly valid screen or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted February 28, 2008 Share Posted February 28, 2008 manny - PcOverclock.net Teamonly 3dmarks..... 2001 not real score for this clocks (some videocards 64bit). benchmark was not run using default settings. no resolution on screen or no video info. sometimes he use omega driver and run not on default settings. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700529 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702827 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701138 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639119 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700899 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640591 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700880 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702176 2003 professional edition,no resolution on screen: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702776 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=701141 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=702828 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=700900 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689844 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697095 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=700531 2005 professional edition,no resolution on screen: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700532 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703037 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700882 old version 3dmark: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657017 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600522 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698659 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697097 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640594 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690554 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657015 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641360 2006 professional edition,no resolution on screen: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700536 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698660 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700883 old version 3dmark: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690558 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697098 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640596 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602405 ban?!? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685120 (crew) o polonos checked by a moderator () =-0!!! Aquamark - 127779 marks Processor: Core 2 E6600 (2.4Gh... @ 4000mhz on h2o Videocard: GeForce 7600 GS DDR2 @ 550/450mhz Not real(compare to other results). No info on screen. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!6600DDR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658171 GOZ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658174 GOZ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657772 GOZ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658168 GOZ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688299 cheat http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=655229 our friend MaSell and 6600ddr3 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637950 and his friend cheater passat ^^^^^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted February 28, 2008 Share Posted February 28, 2008 still not fixed: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=659795 The result you are trying to view could not be found. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600765 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600762 what kind of verification is this,wprime is wrong and no cpu-z??? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696448 why is not fixed??????I never seen biggest fake..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaSell Posted February 28, 2008 Share Posted February 28, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626004 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696448 impossible score http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627180 no screen http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=525864 + http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695134 LOL http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627179 no screen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
intouch Posted February 28, 2008 Share Posted February 28, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=702446 -> Wrong videocard category Thx to fix it ++ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted February 28, 2008 Share Posted February 28, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626004 What do you mean? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DopeLex Posted February 28, 2008 Share Posted February 28, 2008 Still not fixed: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700569 2nd time User uploads this result - 3DMark06 default resolution is still 1280x1024 and not the used 1280x800. Guy has to use an external Monitor if 16:10 LCD can't display 1280x1024. Less Line's mean's lower work for GFX ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted February 28, 2008 Share Posted February 28, 2008 ..maybe this time,pls http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696559 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696448 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696002 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696164 wrong pifast http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=643993 no verification http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680115 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=670737 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=659795 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=683508 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=600765 not enough proof http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=600762 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted February 28, 2008 Share Posted February 28, 2008 Still not fixed: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=700569 2nd time User uploads this result - 3DMark06 default resolution is still 1280x1024 and not the used 1280x800. Guy has to use an external Monitor if 16:10 LCD can't display 1280x1024. Less Line's mean's lower work for GFX ! fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
topdog Posted February 28, 2008 Share Posted February 28, 2008 Try again, thanks All the results below have been entered in the GeForce 8800 GT 256 Mb category but they are GeForce 8800 GT 512 Mb video cards http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693360 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691553 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691036 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685349 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693407 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687754 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690897 no proof but other benchmarks was with 512 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689963 no proof that it is 256 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684795 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682976 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691554 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694148 ATI Radeon 9800 XT in futuremark link, and screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb card http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694319 Same user as above but different team, ATI Radeon 9800 XT in futuremark link, and screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb card http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681706 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686510 no proof, sig in forumpost shows 8800 GT 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687443 Single Water Cooled EVGA 8800GT 512 indescription http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684791 no proof that it is 256 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682971 same user as above, no proof that it is 256 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694729 futuremark link shows 512 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691322 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688062 same user as above 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689175 no proof that it is 256 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682877 futuremark link shows 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681602 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687795 futuremark link shows 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691080 futuremark link shows 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689105 same user as above http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687509 512 in description and futuremark link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691113 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691582 futuremark link shows 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690902 no proof that it is 256 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688346 same as above http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682399 no proof that it is 256 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687872 no proof that it is 256 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681627 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693497 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693505 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693492 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692932 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692671 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692583 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690637 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690475 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688443 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690718 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688440 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688435 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687545 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687086 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691910 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686677 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686956 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686663 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686660 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685682 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681643 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681637 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683327 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690540 no validation http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687667 no proof 8800 512 in sig http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689874 no validation http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682629 futuremark link shows 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688427 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694156 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683841 futuremark link shows 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685335 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689196 futuremark link shows 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685404 futuremark link shows 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688713 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688058 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692734 Gainward 8800GT GS http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682400 no proof, sig in forumpost shows 8800 GT 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693386 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691370 no proof that it is 256 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690436 not enough proof Sorry for the long list but I just want my trophies back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ServerManiac Posted February 28, 2008 Share Posted February 28, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687039 no wPrime in taskbar and no Everest in tray And Please look at Bwanasoft's Athlon XP Palomino results. I think all of them are drawn in Photoshop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaStEr Posted February 28, 2008 Share Posted February 28, 2008 and Please look at Bwanasoft's Athlon XP Palomino results. I think all of them are drawn in Photoshop. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted February 29, 2008 Share Posted February 29, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680957 this is too high,I can believe this is SLI -pls remove it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew NeoForce Posted February 29, 2008 Crew Share Posted February 29, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680957 this is too high,I can believe this is SLI -pls remove it fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted February 29, 2008 Share Posted February 29, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615789 no resolution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew NeoForce Posted February 29, 2008 Crew Share Posted February 29, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615789 no resolution fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted February 29, 2008 Share Posted February 29, 2008 thanks man Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts