toutatoc Posted May 4, 2008 Posted May 4, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731749 Nothing on the screen ?
demiurg Posted May 4, 2008 Posted May 4, 2008 demiurg, thanks for those SPi 32M scores (you know what I mean)! )But what about this? frebrez received both scores.. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637225 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636553 Please check this. fixed
VanDynck Posted May 4, 2008 Posted May 4, 2008 This user: http://hwbot.org/user.do?userId=6067 Have a lot of wrong results please do something!! Example: X1800 XT and X1800GTO2 dont show the especific model only the "X1800 Series" from 3DM. GMA950: no image, no screenshot, no link, no nothing!!! And a lot of results are the same wrong. This user is a joke!!
vad78 Posted May 4, 2008 Posted May 4, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731677 wrong result - it's not PCMark 2005 score, it's 3DMarks score http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727378 . And the screenshot is not sufficient information
Hyperhorn Posted May 4, 2008 Posted May 4, 2008 Because of the fact my wPrime scores with v.1.58 were deleted, you should delete this result, too: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=714606 It's 1.60, not 1.55 like hwbot wants...
knopflerbruce Posted May 4, 2008 Posted May 4, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731549 Needs to be moved - this is like a fat chick in the miss universe contest:D
demiurg Posted May 5, 2008 Posted May 5, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731677 no proof, bad screenhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=728419 screen doesn't show cpu http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=727924 screen cover lap time http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731744 no proof, bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731737 no proof, bad screen fixed
demiurg Posted May 5, 2008 Posted May 5, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729699 not enought proof fixed
demiurg Posted May 5, 2008 Posted May 5, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731549 Needs to be moved - this is like a fat chick in the miss universe contest:D fixed
lunatic@98 Posted May 5, 2008 Posted May 5, 2008 Wrong category "Go 7600 GT" in "7600 Go" list http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580585
71proste Posted May 5, 2008 Posted May 5, 2008 wrong wprime version after 1.1.08 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=715144 1.54 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697128 1.43 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698155 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697129 1.43 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699121 1.43 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699123 1.43
Pepek86 Posted May 5, 2008 Posted May 5, 2008 wprime wrong version after 1.1.08 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720434 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=720455 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698104 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721048 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721030 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697459 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=724427 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=721044 1.61 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=708604 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731489 not enought proof, no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731988 bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=731991 bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729812 bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729810 bad screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732867 move from9200 PRO to 9200 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732850 move from9200 PRO to 9200
lunatic@98 Posted May 5, 2008 Posted May 5, 2008 wrong wprime version after 1.1.08http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697128 1.43 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697129 1.43 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699121 1.43 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699123 1.43 huch I bench this again, with 1300Mhz more than you and can go to the old place
demiurg Posted May 6, 2008 Posted May 6, 2008 Wrong category "Go 7600 GT" in "7600 Go" list http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580585 fixed
71proste Posted May 6, 2008 Posted May 6, 2008 huch I bench this again, with 1300Mhz more than you and can go to the old place Good for you,but use correct wprime this time
malefic Fess Posted May 6, 2008 Posted May 6, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732470 wrong category, fix pls. 915 posted as 845
demiurg Posted May 6, 2008 Posted May 6, 2008 wrong wprime version after 1.1.08http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=715144 1.54 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697128 1.43 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698155 1.58 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697129 1.43 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699121 1.43 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699123 1.43 fixed
phobosq Posted May 6, 2008 Posted May 6, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729438 - E6850 posted as T5250 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729434 - E8400 as T5470 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729439 - E8400 as T5500 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729436 - duplicated result above, E8400 as T5500 - I checked their forum, the guy quoted previous score http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=729437 - T7500 as E2220
Crew Turrican Posted May 6, 2008 Crew Posted May 6, 2008 wrong wprime version (1.54) after 01/01/08 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690046
Crew Sweet Posted May 6, 2008 Crew Posted May 6, 2008 Wrong Score http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732643 3DMark'05's score in PCMark'05 Check and fix it, please
Veld Posted May 7, 2008 Posted May 7, 2008 non-1.55 wPrime after 1/1/08 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695571 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687043 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686927 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684465 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707354 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=707353 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=724201 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567829 - invalid checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=563238 - invalid checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570267 - invalid checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572061 - invalid checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674735 - invalid checksum Please check'em all...
mtech Posted May 7, 2008 Posted May 7, 2008 Please, check these results: 1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674418 - Verification link is not valid 2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681012 - No resolution on the screenshot 3. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673229 - Invalid screenshot 4. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=661571 - No resolution on the screenshot
darkniz Posted May 7, 2008 Posted May 7, 2008 Please, check these results: 1.http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=732442 - Almost 600% OC with a notebook? 2.All results from http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=12631 with a pentium 1 processor. - All pentium 1 processor have the same Revision and Stepping, i think it`s the same processor for all results.
malefic Fess Posted May 7, 2008 Posted May 7, 2008 so what about this? http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=19849&postcount=1915
Recommended Posts