Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Hello ,

 

I install HWBOT Aquamark on XP SO and run with that settings and result :

 

2600 k , 2 Cores HT Off , 5500 Mhz

GTX 580 SOC , 1025/1980/2200 Mhz

 

15eck5l.jpg

 

D3DOverdrive On Triple Buffer

 

Drivers 285.38 Beta

 

How is posible that low result ?

 

On 3DMark 2001 the result its Ok , see it :

 

sbqxp1.jpg

 

Any idea that low result on Aquamark ?

 

Thanks on advance

Hello friend ! That's Ok , I try on Win 7 quickly !! ;)

 

Thanks for idea ! :)

Apply same tweak like you do for 01 + fermi and you will have good AM3 scores in XP.

 

Poor performance in XP is down to D3D?

good aka better than under Win7 with proper tweaks ?

 

Low result anyway on Win 7 , 254 K only ..... :(

 

With old Aquamark the results are the best than now.

:D Any time bro!

 

Can you push to 1066MHz strap for the memory? That will help you for sure :)

Apply same tweak like you do for 01 + fermi and you will have good AM3 scores in XP.

 

Cmon just tell people to use PRE_D3D9_COMP_BIT

Better is better! :)

 

LOL....since you started this thread, your score has more than doubled. That's pretty cool :D

Better is better! :)

 

LOL....since you started this thread, your score has more than doubled. That's pretty cool :D

 

Yes , good work bro !!! :o

 

Thanks is really cool !! :celebration:

Poor performance in XP is down to D3D?

 

No.

 

Cmon just tell people to use PRE_D3D9_COMP_BIT

 

Hehe ... I thought that was super-obvious :D

No.

 

 

 

Hehe ... I thought that was super-obvious :D

 

So...... changing a D3D setting fixes AM3, but the fix isn't related to D3D?

It's the same Nvidia Inspector tweak for Fermi+01 that also fixes Aquamark3 XP performance ;)

 

The bit is called 'PRE_D3D9_COMP_BIT'

You missed my question? :)

 

Me: "Poor performance in XP is down to D3D?"

 

You: "No."

 

....but.....it IS down to D3D by the looks of things.

 

I guess it's a mute point. Benchmark fix = benchmark fix :)

Hello ,

 

At XP SO , activate D3DOverride and nvidia inspector bit at Aquamark is the best result.

 

See here its the best result than Win 7 :

 

9sbdic.jpg

 

This setting is valid for 3D03 , 3D05 ?

 

The result high exponentially.

dude you have to set more than 2 cores bro atleast 4 :)

 

Ok , then is best set 4 cores , but the result not modifies.

 

Thanks for the suggest.;)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...