I.M.O.G. Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 Congrats, impressive clocks! Another old BD chip tearing it up. Quote
Eeky NoX Posted July 3, 2012 Posted July 3, 2012 Well done bro great job here. And I know it wasn't easy. Quote
Wizerty Posted July 4, 2012 Posted July 4, 2012 Thk. just_nuke_em : I still have only 4 liters, I hope it will be enough to beat you, so keep a tight ass, i will be back soon Quote
Wizerty Posted July 4, 2012 Posted July 4, 2012 Christian : Do you remember which core was better last time ? The 1st module and the last are really bad, something like 7.6 // The 2nd module is not bad, 8.18 Ghz, et the 3rd is good 8.3 + I just remember last time we used the number "3", but 3 = module 2 core 1 or "3" for module 3 core 1 ?? Quote
Christian Ney Posted July 4, 2012 Posted July 4, 2012 I don't but the one that maxed out at 8.17 Quote
Quake Posted July 4, 2012 Posted July 4, 2012 So for better overclocking, we have to play BF3 for six months and then try again? Nice score! Quote
Wizerty Posted July 4, 2012 Posted July 4, 2012 "So for better overclocking, we have to play BF3 for six months and then try again? :P" Exactly, you can try with "the sims" if you want Quote
Christian Ney Posted July 5, 2012 Posted July 5, 2012 A bug is present into cpuz 1.61 which shows bus speed higher an therefore cpu and memory clocks higher. Please use cpuz 1.60. More info here: http://hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=50819 Quote
Christian Ney Posted July 6, 2012 Posted July 6, 2012 After investigation this result wasn't affected by the CPUZ 1.61/60x Bugs Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.