I.nfraR.ed Posted March 11, 2013 Posted March 11, 2013 It seems that there is some bug in the XP-M 2500+ rankings - http://hwbot.org/benchmark/superpi_-_1m/rankings?start=0&hardwareTypeId=processor_1231#start=0#interval=20 I was browsing through submissions and noticed that #1 and #2 have exactly the same time and description under the score. Main screenshots are different, but the screenshot from the first submission is also present as a link in Jaan's sub. Jaan's submission screenshot shows a run at 3GHz. The competition was held long time ago, so I don't remember what was his final score, however it's listed there as a 3.3GHz run. I don't remember how was the ranking before, but I think that might be related to the recently fixed bug with unlinked screenshots to scores. Same bug might be present in other rankings as well. Quote
Devroush Posted March 11, 2013 Posted March 11, 2013 Seems to me there's nothing wrong with the screenshots, but Jaan's submission is some sort of mix of his own submission and sobih's . Score, cpu speed, comment and verification seem to be copied from sobih. Quote
Mr.Scott Posted March 12, 2013 Posted March 12, 2013 http://hwbot.org/benchmark/superpi_-_1m/rankings?start=0&hardwareTypeId=processor_1231#start=0#interval=20 This sub should be blocked. Time in comp SS doesn't match the submitted time. Shame this wasn't caught in the comp. It cost a few people some positions and points. Quote
GENiEBEN Posted March 12, 2013 Posted March 12, 2013 http://hwbot.org/benchmark/superpi_-_1m/rankings?start=0&hardwareTypeId=processor_1231#start=0#interval=20This sub should be blocked. Time in comp SS doesn't match the submitted time. Shame this wasn't caught in the comp. It cost a few people some positions and points. Bad link? Quote
Mr.Scott Posted March 12, 2013 Posted March 12, 2013 (edited) Bad link? Dam. http://hwbot.org/submission/1010788_jaan_superpi___1m_athlon_xp_m_2500_33sec_516ms Edit- Nevermind. I see now the sub has been corrected. Still doesn't change the way the comp points were distributed though. Edited March 12, 2013 by Mr.Scott Quote
Massman Posted March 13, 2013 Posted March 13, 2013 Is it possible that Jaan edited the submitted result? Surely this would have been caught during the competition - participants are always closely watching what happens in the competitions. Quote
GENiEBEN Posted March 13, 2013 Posted March 13, 2013 Is it possible that Jaan edited the submitted result? Surely this would have been caught during the competition - participants are always closely watching what happens in the competitions. You can't edit Competition subs unless you remove it from the competition. Quote
I.nfraR.ed Posted March 13, 2013 Author Posted March 13, 2013 (edited) I don't remember (it was 3 years ago), but perhaps the only thing left from the original submission is the screenshot. Other things (score, frequency, additional link to another screenshot and description were somehow copied from sobih's submission. I don't think if that was Jaan's submission in the comp, it could have remained unnoticed. Jaan's other submission in the comp (pifast) has the same frequency. Turrican won the competition back then, but I don't remember who was second. looking at sobih's profile, this is the only submission he has and I can't judge who owns that cascade. Here's the news from 2010 - http://hwbot.org/news/2920_turrican_wins_hwbot_oc_challenge_may_2010. Turrican - first, Berserker - second and Jaan - third. Edited March 13, 2013 by I.nfraR.ed Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.