Is this result Fake? (so easy question!)

So, feel free (plz) say your opinions about this result:
http://img.hotoverclock.com/viewer.php?file=38204558196965996794.jpg (link edited)

is this Fake?

is artifact an unusual issue on hot gpus??

Edited June 27, 2010 by olesius

Mr.Scott · June 27, 2010

Interesting. Notice the text is un affected by said artifact. The lower case "P" is still fully visible.

Olesius · June 28, 2010

Interesting. Notice the text is un affected by said artifact. The lower case "P" is still fully visible.

thank you my friend for joining the Discussion

do you say the text must be changed?

Edited June 28, 2010 by olesius

Alriin · June 28, 2010

In the past i also seen (some of my) Screenshots like this in 3DMark and PCMark05... with pointed or lined artifacts. Coloured black or white... i think its a effect of too high overclocking with a Driver who allowed very high clocks. These artifacts are rare but possible, when the clocks too high and you bring the 3DMark (CPU-Z, GPU-Z)-Windows in Position.

I search one hour in my Database, but i can't find a good example. :-(

My Opinion: no Fake!

Olesius · June 28, 2010

In the past i also seen (some of my) Screenshots like this in 3DMark and PCMark05... with pointed or lined artifacts. Coloured black or white... i think its a effect of too high overclocking with a Driver who allowed very high clocks. These artifacts are rare but possible, when the clocks too high and you bring the 3DMark (CPU-Z, GPU-Z)-Windows in Position.
I search one hour in my Database, but i can't find a good example. :-(

My Opinion: no Fake!

thank you Alriin

I remember your pcmark result by black lines and we had long conv about this issue...

(mybe some one deleted it conv and result?!)

anyway, i have another question (from everybody) :

we have new reporting way in HWBOT.ORG??

Results were reported to the crew, but not through the normal channels.

so team capitans do not receive any report pm (and email), is it true?

when a submition (s) did not reported in normal way, what could we do??

another note:

admins do not ban every one by his first fake result (if we say this result is fake)!

so, i want one of the admins (else massman) to reply me (and my team members) our friend (Overclockers) why got banned?

http://hwbot.org/community/user/overclockers

tnks

Antinomy · June 28, 2010

thank you Alriin
another note:

admins do not ban every one by his first fake result (if we say this result is fake)!

tnks

As I know, they do ban with the first result - this happened about a week ago.

And won't believe how many should (are to) be banned

Olesius · June 28, 2010

As I know, they do ban with the first result - this happened about a week ago.
And won't believe how many should (are to) be banned

Sorry, I must explain beter:

if anyone has reported your submition, will you get banned?? (really no!)

at this problem we know the results are not fake!

we wanted to provide orb valid link for submitions but did not accept it

Edited June 29, 2010 by olesius

Antinomy · June 28, 2010

Nope, a reported submission is only a reported submission. If it's really fake then don't complain.

Try to show your arguments to the moderators and admin. They are not fans of conversation though sometimes respond and sometimes quickly. But only sometimes.

The best we can do - is make our efforts not in cheating but in cheat-proofing. If everyone would share their ideas the competition would only win of this.

knopflerbruce · June 29, 2010

If you find some other submissions that have this artifact, drop me (or some other mod) a PM or post it here. If it's a bug that happens when you push the cards, then there should be more of these.

Olesius · June 29, 2010

Nope, a reported submission is only a reported submission. If it's really fake then don't complain.

Try to show your arguments to the moderators and admin. They are not fans of conversation though sometimes respond and sometimes quickly. But only sometimes.

The best we can do - is make our efforts not in cheating but in cheat-proofing. If everyone would share their ideas the competition would only win of this.

I got confused my friend...

can you say your opinion about this 3dmark01 result (post #1)? is that fake?? (y/n)

be sure, if my friends results were fake we did not pursue this issue for 5-6 months...

we did not receive any good reply from admins (massman!) so had to open a topic in forum

If you find some other submissions that have this artifact, drop me (or some other mod) a PM or post it here. If it's a bug that happens when you push the cards, then there should be more of these.

dear knopflerbruce,

do you say we show more artifacted results? (but massman noticed just this result)

anyway, can you say us this result is fake or photoshoped?

score is ok and correct for that freq

tnks

edit:

i found more detail

our email:

Anyway, if this result is "questionable" we must receive report or

notification, am i right?

we did not receive any email from hwbot crews for "overclockers" results...

by first questionable result user account must be removed?

massman's email:

This "white line artifact" is present in many, many screenshots ...

our email:

if "Overclockers" wanted to submit Fake results, surely worked more

with photoshop to got better pics!

dear knopflerbruce you say if artifacted results be more its bug! but massman has banned my friend because of more artifacted results

massman went R&D team, so we want another admin or moderator attend this issue

Edited June 29, 2010 by olesius

Antinomy · June 29, 2010

I can't say certainly. I've seen similar things being a result of high compression JPEG (but the colour is strange for this in this case) or high overclocking. OTOH it can be screen editing done quite lame.

As Mr. Scott mentioned, the letter "p" is over the white line and this makes me think it's a API bug that could be caused by video memory. Except that video memory isn't any close to super-frequency, 1100 is not quite high. May be a memory controller in the GPU, but this I leave to experts, I'm lame in this. The letter makes me think it's an API bug like this:

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/677611_vediovis_wprime_32m_2x_pentium_3_600mhz_slot_1_100mhz_fsb_2min_53sec_590ms

Turrican · June 29, 2010

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/677611_vediovis_wprime_32m_2x_pentium_3_600mhz_slot_1_100mhz_fsb_2min_53sec_590ms

sometimes this happens when you move the cpu-z window over each other and don't "refresh" them.

i also had this problem a few times.

Antinomy · June 29, 2010

Some screenshot-making programs can also cause this.

Mr.Scott · June 30, 2010

thank you my friend for joining the Discussion

do you say the text must be changed?

Not at all. Just pointing it out is all.

Mr.Scott · June 30, 2010

sometimes this happens when you move the cpu-z window over each other and don't "refresh" them.

i also had this problem a few times.

As have I.

Don_Corleone- · June 30, 2010

So as everyone believes its normal to have artifact WHY just my friend get banned???

Who is responsible in HWBOT?? Why he got banned??

Antinomy · June 30, 2010

1. Not everyone - just a couple of guys that shared with their opinion and don't have any rights in means of results moderation.

2. Definitely not me I'm just a participant like you.

Massman · June 30, 2010

Everyone = 2

None of them say it's "normal".

knopflerbruce · June 30, 2010

The CPUZ artifact is very coomon, and the 3DMark01 artifact that's being discussed here is unique. If this happens at relatively low clocks like in this case, then there should be plenty more of the same type out there.

Olesius · June 30, 2010

Everyone = 2

None of them say it's "normal".

plz read the topic again

In the past i also seen (some of my) Screenshots like this in 3DMark and PCMark05... with pointed or lined artifacts. Coloured black or white... i think its a effect of too high overclocking with a Driver who allowed very high clocks. These artifacts are rare but possible, when the clocks too high and you bring the 3DMark (CPU-Z, GPU-Z)-Windows in Position.
I search one hour in my Database, but i can't find a good example. :-(

My Opinion: no Fake!

The CPUZ artifact is very coomon, and the 3DMark01 artifact that's being discussed here is unique. If this happens at relatively low clocks like in this case, then there should be plenty more of the same type out there.

my friend

do you say if we have more same artifacted results it is ok? but one result is fake?

massman say my friend had many same results with white lines...

plz richba5tard or NeoForce or Turrican or Thor941 attend this issue

Edited June 30, 2010 by olesius

Sign In

Is this result Fake? (so easy question!)

Recommended Posts

Olesius

Antinomy

Olesius

Olesius

Don_Corleone-

Olesius

Mr.Scott

Olesius

Alriin

Olesius

Antinomy

Olesius

Antinomy

knopflerbruce

Olesius

Antinomy

Turrican

Antinomy

Mr.Scott

Mr.Scott

Don_Corleone-

Antinomy

Massman

knopflerbruce

Olesius

HWBOT

Browse

Activity