Crew Olesius Posted June 30, 2010 Author Crew Share Posted June 30, 2010 (edited) Everyone = 2 None of them say it's "normal". plz read the topic again In the past i also seen (some of my) Screenshots like this in 3DMark and PCMark05... with pointed or lined artifacts. Coloured black or white... i think its a effect of too high overclocking with a Driver who allowed very high clocks. These artifacts are rare but possible, when the clocks too high and you bring the 3DMark (CPU-Z, GPU-Z)-Windows in Position.I search one hour in my Database, but i can't find a good example. :-( My Opinion: no Fake! The CPUZ artifact is very coomon, and the 3DMark01 artifact that's being discussed here is unique. If this happens at relatively low clocks like in this case, then there should be plenty more of the same type out there. my friend do you say if we have more same artifacted results it is ok? but one result is fake? massman say my friend had many same results with white lines... plz richba5tard or NeoForce or Turrican or Thor941 attend this issue Edited June 30, 2010 by olesius Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted June 30, 2010 Share Posted June 30, 2010 plz read the topic again my friend do you say if we have more same artifacted results it is ok? but one result is fake? massman say my friend had many same results with white lines... plz richba5tard or NeoForce or Turrican or Thor941 attend this issue If you find some (more than one) similar results from other userS, or find a way to reproduce the graphical errors, then that will be discussed, I guess. I don't mind of there are other mods who will take part in this thread, but why do you need EVERYONE to take a look at this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Olesius Posted July 1, 2010 Author Crew Share Posted July 1, 2010 (edited) If you find some (more than one) similar results from other userS, or find a way to reproduce the graphical errors, then that will be discussed, I guess. I don't mind of there are other mods who will take part in this thread, but why do you need EVERYONE to take a look at this? we want any one (else massman) attend this issue because at first massman said us make valid orb link to show the results is not fake... but that time, my friend has sold his 8800gtx , some months later we found another 8800gtx and send a pm for massman to making valid links for artifacted results... but massman said us: how can new results prove previous results were not photoshopped? my email: Dear Pieter i think if previous results be photoshopped we can not repeat them, is it true? you said: "strange scores"!! and asked us orb link, at now we want to do it... what is the problem? and massman's email: How would new scores prove anything? :-) The score was not strange, but the screenshot/verification was. massman like "prove" word! so we say: massman, prove us this result is FAKE?!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Edited July 1, 2010 by olesius Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richba5tard Posted July 1, 2010 Share Posted July 1, 2010 Olesius, it is not the job of the submission moderator to prove a suspicious submission is a fake. It is the duty of the submitter to prove otherwise. If not, it would be impossible to moderate half a million submissions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Olesius Posted July 1, 2010 Author Crew Share Posted July 1, 2010 Olesius, it is not the job of the submission moderator to prove a suspicious submission is a fake. It is the duty of the submitter to prove otherwise. If not, it would be impossible to moderate half a million submissions. if I say massman's result is fake, how can he prove?? we want to make orb valid links for artifacted submitions and i think it is true let us to deffence ourself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted July 1, 2010 Share Posted July 1, 2010 If you have an orb link, post it. Massman can prove his results are OK by having screenshots that have no errors. Very simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Olesius Posted July 1, 2010 Author Crew Share Posted July 1, 2010 If you have an orb link, post it. Massman can prove his results are OK by having screenshots that have no errors. Very simple. no, we bought vantage and 06 register codes 1month ago so can repeat 8800gtx tests and give you orb valid link i say this result is fake!! how can massman prove it? http://hwbot.org/community/submission/950764_massman_wprime_32m_core_i5_661_7sec_329ms by 249.4mhz bclk, memory freq must be 748.2 but we see 721mhz !!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Scott Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 i say this result is fake!! how can massman prove it? http://hwbot.org/community/submissio...661_7sec_329ms by 249.4mhz bclk, memory freq must be 748.2 but we see 721mhz !!!!! Going on a witch hunt for retaliation never helps anyone's case. Heed the words. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 by 249.4mhz bclk, memory freq must be 748.2 but we see 721mhz !!!!! I forgot to refresh the memory tab after increasing the BCLK through the dashboard ... it's not fake. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richba5tard Posted July 2, 2010 Share Posted July 2, 2010 if I say massman's result is fake, how can he prove?? we want to make orb valid links for artifacted submitions and i think it is true let us to deffence ourself He does not have to if there is nothing suspicious about the given screenshot or score. If there is something suspicious, a member has to prove the submission is correct by supplying a futuremark url, redo the benchmark with a proper screenshot, etc. We have explained it multiple times. This thread is closed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts