Submission & member moderation

I've got a Geforce 6800LE, which has got vgpu mod, and is running 500 on core and 445 mhz on ram (890 DDR).. And cpu Xeon 3070 @ 3,78 GHz when testing.. And then I see P.A.S.S.A.T's result with 6800LE.. he is at 400/420 mhz on core 410 mhz on ram.. and has a Xeon 3070 @ 3.9 Ghz.. and I can't really understand how he can get higher score with 100-80 mhz lower on core, and 35 mhz on ram.. even though his cpu is 120 mhz higher it shouldn't do that much for the scores.. here is the link for the 6800LE class http://hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1195 Can anyone please explain/check it for me.. (included P.A.S.S.A.T) would like to ask him too.. but cou…

PLease, remove result in test SuperPi 32M on first position. This result is result of socket 754 processor (Palermo). View screenshot

We need screenies as well as compareURLs for 3DM results? I have a compare URL but no screeny and it wont let me upload. please can this be made optional? If I submit the result on the forum with just a compareURL it wouldnt matter..

massman, i got your email. do you want proof that i use 4.1? An hwbot crew member, Massman, has blocked one of your submitted scores. It has been marked as 'incorrect submission'. This was the reason the user gave: This is PiFast 4.3, we use 4.1 !

There are a few SLI results in the single card category. The GPU clocks arent that high, and the CPUs are mid-clocked AMD, which REALLY gives it away http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=537783 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=537792 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=545593 I hope those compare urls are the ones ya need to check them Cheers, Kenny

OutOfSpecs.Gr and their PCM05 leaderboard has got me wondering. Sure, they could have gone out and bought a load of I-RAM gear, but for no other team to be solid with I-RAM looks a bit odd.... http://www.outofspecs.gr/forum/showthread.php?t=129

I was going to submit my results for this card and then I noticed that I couldn't run it at the normal resolution of 1280 x 1024 on my laptop (screen is only 1280 x 800). Looking at the results in the database, it appears that others as well didn't run it at the standard 3dm06 resolution while others did. Should I submit my results at 1280 x 800? Thanks!

I know this was discussed and said it wasn't allowed. I tried to find where it was posted before. I have been looking through this teams scores http://www.hwbot.org/teamInfo.do?teamId=1546 and it appears there might be some sharing of HW. Today I came across results that almost definately point towards it. There are a few members on this team moving up ranks quickly with GTX and Ultra results. Here's the 01 runs that seem just a little too odd. Identical mobo's identical cpu both LN2 runs and both submitted within 10 minutes of each other? The only thing that changes is the graphics card. Scan date: 11-08-2007 01:19 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultI…

I simple question to the moderator who have block my score in 2003 with single card. I have post the screen photo but the link in not working because I have not buy this bench. So I must buy from futuremark the bench to submit the verification link or what? Is this fair? Do all the bencher has buy the bench for futuremark to get high points? Thanks gprhelas edit a link for download the score info http://www.hwbox.gr/showpost.php?p=3561&postcount=29 http://www.hwbox.gr/attachment.php?attachmentid=676&d=1187522818

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636461 Could you please explain to me why I recieve no points on this, yet another member of our team recieved points for a lower score with the same CPU and GPU. Thank You

wrong result! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627492 it must be SLI. not single

Ok here is the problem. A guy submitted a result of cpu-z on a Pentium 4 2.4GHz A Northwood. I checked his forumpost and I noticed that he has a Pentium 4 2.4GHz C HT Northwood. So I reported his result. Afterwards I checked out the Pentium 4 2.4GHz C HT Northwood and I realized that he had submitted the exact same result on that cpu too:eek:. Can somebody do something for this? I'll keep the wrong results coming:D http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=623106

How many global hwboints can be received in one category? It seems like more than one http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=5737

My videocard is Radeon 1650 PRO 512mb with AGP, not pcie my result is bad when comparing with oters pcie cards can you make subdivision for AGP and PCIE?

My PCMark05 score was initally removed by Futuremark. So that is why i think the score was marked as blocked, eventhough I already had a screen shot included. This was before the IRAM fiasco. Anyway.. I was able re-publish teh score again. This is an IRAM PCMark score that is published. Can you please approve it. Here is the link to my published score: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=717485 Here is the score that was blocked: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571506 Would be possible to mark this score as verified, so it can't be blocked again? I am not sure if FM will remove the score again the future. Thanks. Ton

OCZTony has had 2 scores deleted for 3D03 and 3D05, can someone tell me why? 2 scores have been removed from the Hall of Fame, they should be 18th in 03 and the 05 score should be 49th, why have they been deleted? 3D03 Score/post: http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/forum/showpost.php?p=226528&postcount=77 3D05 Score/post: http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/forum/showpost.php?p=226526&postcount=78 The 03 score is in the top 20 and has been submitted to the orb here: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=5446469 The 05 score is not in the top 20, so why has it been removed? Last night everything was fine and points were awarded, now nothing…

I can' t see any option in the form for submitting results in aquamark for the new rules of having to have the html result file ? ?

Just wondering why my 3dmark06 15663 result is blocked?

hi, since i updated a new 3d01 score using 2x hd2900xt cards, the points for my second fastest 3d01 score (2x x1900xt) are gone. is it possible that the bot cant see the diference between x1900 and hd2900 cards - so that he thinks my x1900xt run is the same setup like the hd2900xt run and wouldn't give me points for my second best run (on like the thinks) the same setup? i just like to get my x1900xt crossfire points back, because 73k in 3d01 is still enough to get points on that setup. i mean that score: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=607888 thanks a lot bye chris

So here we are. Look at this results, and pls transfer it to good category. 3DMark 01 1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580818 Description: A64 3000+ @ 2910MHz - 7300GT @ 760/1880 - this isn't DDR2 2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580168 Description: Venice 3000+ @ 2700mhz - Galaxy 7300GT @ 785/1880 - next Galaxy DDR3 card in DDR2 category. 3DMark 03 1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570588 Description: Athlon64 Venice 3000+ @ 2916MHz - Galaxy GF7300GT 128MB @822/2050 - 2Ghz on DDR2 ? I don't think so... 2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573044 Description: Athlon64 Venice 3000+@2610mhz - Galaxy 7300GT @ 785/1880 + …

I like finding faulty scores:D. This one comes from macci:eek:. He is 2nd in 3dMark05 with multiple cards. Look at his verification link... http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=3162711 He hasn't ran any CPU tests, neither Batch Size tests and he is also missing 3/5 Features tests

That's hillarious. What does he run? A 100 core processor with 50GB DDR-6 ram? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=614038

can a mod point me to, link me to "result moderation" rules and set guidelines that the mods refer to when making any decisions @ hwbot thanks baz

Some guy has submitted a PCMark05 result with a Pentium 4 524 lga775 taking 1st place which I am sure is wrong. Check it out and you'll see what I mean

About http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=611672 In the CPU-z screen, you can clearly see it's a Xeon X5365, running default at 3.0GHz (hardwareId=CPU_1407). I reported this as "badly matched" as it is ranked amongst Xeon 5345-CPU's (only 2.33GHz stock, hardwareId=CPU_1267). I totally agree with the result, it's an acceptable score, so no doubt about the result itself, but it IS badly matched. So please moderators, move the result to the right category