Mr.Scott
-
Posts
3337 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
59
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by Mr.Scott
-
-
Change PCMark05 with wprime and all would be fine
+1
-
lol You're a patient man Frank. WTG.
-
The background link is broken.
-
Is Quadro4 allowed to Geforce 4 series competition?
Not usually.
-
General rules not applicable to all individual benchmarks..?
Here, the sample screenshot for a 3DMark03 run clearly indicates that the memory tab is optional. Pulled from the 3DMark03 rules page. While I'd agree that a memory tab is a good thing to include, I don't believe it is against the rules to not supply one in this case.
All those individual rules are outdated. If you go by those, in Aquamark a screenshot would still be acceptable.
-
Right here.
Screenshots are, next to the links, another method of providing the required verification. Please make sure your screenshot is as clear as possible! In general, this is required:- CPU-Z cpu information tab
- CPU-Z memory information tab
- GPU-Z videocard information tab (3DMark/PCMark/Aquamark)
- For SuperPi/Pifast: entire calculation has to be visible
- For 3DMark/PCMark: benchmark settings have to be visible as well as the subtest scores
-
Hmmm...I thought that CPU-Z processor and memory tabs were mandatory on every benchmark. Matter of fact, I'm pretty sure I've had subs blocked for not having it.
EDIT- Taken right from the rules page.
Screenshots are, next to the links, another method of providing the required verification. Please make sure your screenshot is as clear as possible! In general, this is required:- CPU-Z cpu information tab
- CPU-Z memory information tab
- GPU-Z videocard information tab (3DMark/PCMark/Aquamark)
- For SuperPi/Pifast: entire calculation has to be visible
- For 3DMark/PCMark: benchmark settings have to be visible as well as the subtest scores
-
Same as your 8 series entry. No memory tab in SS.
-
No memory tab in SS.
-
Link to backround?
-
Me too. Lost around 660 UP over night.
-
It's a '07 submission. The rules were different then.
-
Hm, noticed from a picture he's running the latest bios 1402, which was released to public 3 days ago.
Could it be this bios is bugged? The difference with the previous record is so big and he's still going up. 10GHz soon, anyone?
Windows 7 gadgets are happily running, while he's validating.
Yeah, I know I sound like hater, but I still can't believe it.
Wonder if he's increasing the HTref/multi in windows or directly boots with the dialed settings and doesn't touch anything while in windows. Voltage reported by cpuz is still 1.89V.
You don't sound like a hater. I don't believe it either.
-
The friend of my friend is my enemy
sorry for me english
Maintenez vos amis étroits et vos ennemis plus étroits. Désolé pour mon Français.
-
PCMark 05? Really? Are you serious? I don't know about the discussion, but the last score i saw was about 110k, even without extreme cooling.... If you can go from 30k to over 100k points in a benchmark, just with "tweaking", then it's time to disable points or to forbid tweaks I guess
You're my new best friend.
-
It's called RMA:D
Only if it's still made.
RMA'ing say, BH-5, would be futile.
-
edo, sdr, ddr1, ddr2, ddr3 ?
Holy crap, you save the dead stuff too?
-
I sandbagged so I didn't take Paco's score out. Gloves will be off this time. Good run Ivan.
-
It also says the enthusiast league is "the entry league for new overclockers". Being experienced enough to get WR points in this league, you're no longer a rookie and should move on.
^^^ This. Suck it up and move along. You'll not have your cake and eat it too in the E league. It's a pointless argument. Do you really expect the staff to totally restructure the leagues for a few entries?
-
Nice job Frank.
-
Way to help out Eddie.
-
your results are ok. i'll maybe rename the category so people will not be confused anymore.
That would be wonderful. Sorry for causing a problem.
-
Hello, i posted my scores with my Sapphire Rage 128 Pro Ultra
http://hwbot.org/benchmark/3dmark_99_max/rankings?hardwareTypeId=videocard_1775#start=0#interval=20
http://hwbot.org/benchmark/3dmark2000/rankings?hardwareTypeId=videocard_1775#start=0#interval=20
http://hwbot.org/benchmark/3dmark2001_se/rankings?hardwareTypeId=videocard_1775#start=0#interval=20
http://hwbot.org/benchmark/aquamark/rankings?hardwareTypeId=videocard_1775#start=0#interval=20
and I saw that in the HWBot list are 2 ranks:
"ATI Rage 128 PRO" and "ATI Rage 128 PRO AGP 4X"
So I put my scores with my Sapphire Rage 128 Pro AGP 4X on "ATI Rage 128 PRO AGP 4X" but than i saw the score with the "ATI Rage 128 PRO" and also hier there are ATI Rage 128 PRO with AGP4X slots -.-
So what is the difference between "ATI Rage 128 PRO" and "ATI RAGE 128 PRO AGP 4X"?
I was wrong to put my score on "ATI Rage 128 PRO AGP4X?
I must put my scores on "ATI Rage 128 PRO" without AGP 4X?
Because now thw 2 ranks:
ATI Rage 128 Pro and ATI Rage 128 PRO AGP4X
are the same :sisi:
I'm sorry, it's probably my fault you're asking about this. I flagged a few entries made with the Ultra version that were lumped into the other categories. Currently there is no category for the Ultra version. I believe that there should be, but it will be at the discretion of the staff how they want to handle it. I'm sitting on submissions for all of those Rage classes right now waiting for the outcome.
-
Duh. I know how it's supposed to work. Just tried it again now .......no deal. As soon as you switch to the next field to fill, it disappears. Besides, it worked fine a couple days ago. Didn't have to screw with the arrows.
egm_xt - FX-8120 @ 4805MHz - 17min 46sec 594ms SuperPi 32m
in Result Discussions
Posted · Edited by Mr.Scott
Zambezi is not 'Vision' bro.