Mr.Scott

You were clear. I'm not condemning anything yet.

I understand that it's not exactly accurate, and personally, I don't really care about the global's. I do however care about my team losing 3000 points. That amount doesn't seem to jive with just modification of the global slope, as CP is primarily a hardware points team. I'll keep watching/listening. It would seem I'm not totally understanding this yet.

Interesting. I pick up roughly 50 global points but lose 200 places in standings. Team CP loses 3000 points over all.

Not at all. Just saying CP will not be a pushover is all. :celebration:

Hardcore man.

You silly silly man.

Huh, me too.

And your dyslexia.

That's fine to have to use FM for a score and a screenshot, but you don't have to worry about any of the warnings as long as you're not using W8/8.1/10 as far as HWB is concerned.

Mmmm.....I don't know Tony. I hate the idea of a limited amount of subs. I have guys that will max that out in a day.

Turn off system info. Don't worry about what FM says. The link is not required at HWB. Bench away Brad.

I'm sorry. I misunderstood. Need to read a little slower.

I never said anybody did anything intentionally, and I never accused anybody of anything.

My bad. You are correct. It would seem there is contradiction in the rules right on the same page. But on the same note, when you see contradiction like this, you should be asking for clarification immediately instead of just interpreting what you see fit..........or at least provide ALL the proof you can to cover your @ss. Yes, the rules are still a problem at HWB, but it seems like more time is spent by most finding loopholes rather than helping fix the problem.

That's bunnyextraction. Let's everybody jump on the current gen or die bandwagon now. Why penalize old gen hardware benchers that are a non factor to current gen benchers anyways?

The difference in your link was specified right here. Again, I don't write the rules, but everybody should be following said same rules, not interpreting them as they see fit.

Integrated is integrated. It was not specified as onboard or on die. Therefore IMO, ALL iGPU subs should have the stated proof in the screenies.

Glad you and Shawn understand where I'm coming from. Right now all your Canadian brothers are hating me hard.

I don't write the rules. Also, if you do some searching, you'll find that I've been pretty vocal about the rules many many times before. If you want to blame me, knock yourself out. I'm not the problem. I only offer a solution. Do what everybody else does. BTW, the few people I know, aren't being called out. They're doing the calling. Sometimes it's good to know who your friends are before you open your trap.

Yes. The same thing that every other team is and has been doing. FWIW, I have no dog in this race. I'm just trying to help a few friends save some face is all.

Report the subs then. Let the mods sort it out. Don't do the lynch mob thing here. This is a public forum. It only makes you look bad.

Yes. This is where 'trust factor' comes into play. It's not a perfect scenario and been brought up many times before.

General rules for CC were followed. Example: MR.X MR.Y MR.Z in a joint session, all used MR.X's platform but used their own GPU's. Each subbed with only their own GPU. Totally legal.

I agree, but it's not a requirement.

That's totally allowed.