yosarianilives
-
Posts
2268 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
9
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by yosarianilives
-
-
Ycruncher is really heavy on the memory system, so depending on cpu could be too fast mem settings, too high fclk, too high cache. Only sometimes is it too high of core if you can't run off the bat. Stability in any other bench is irrelevant for ycruncher stability
-
If you are worried a bench is not worth pts then the best thing to do is bench it more, the more people who bench it the more pts. Seems pretty straightforward to me
-
10 hours ago, TerraRaptor said:
There was a tool named GMAbooster that was able to control/monitor "multi" of iGPU (not sure if it applies to g31). Actually, the clock should be locked with desktop chipsets and is independent of FSB. The boost we get with cpu clock is probably because some of the 3D functions are done through software path (like software vertext shaders in earlier GMA generations).
I was benching 945g+fatbodies recently, chipset is extremely sensitive to voltage and doesn't allow tight timings though mem itself is capable of tight timings if I use external VGA. Sadly, 2.5v vNB was too hot to get golds so I gave up.
That Gma booster tool basically set mobile chipset to run at desktop clocks, it essentially just set a register. Mobile was at like 200 mhz so boosted it to 400 mhz
-
I find certain Gma chipsets clock pretty well, but then certain ones are terrible. The good ones probably would be well worth vmods
-
Interesting as I have seen it where lower chips can't push FSb as hard but score is almost the same until mem goes higher with higher FSb.
-
-
Is Gma popular this week? Lol
-
6 hours ago, unityofsaints said:
Interesting. Is the iGPU overclockable at all or is it all in CPU/mem?
6 hours ago, ObscureParadox said:All CPU and Mem mate, even then it's not straight forward ???
Gpu is overclockable but it's weird. Basically stock the gpu always runs at a certain frequency, I think 400 mhz, no matter the cpu you put in. What it does is has a divider or multi which is selected by the stock FSb, so lower stock FSb means higher multi. It then increases with FSb, although no sensor shows that. There is also no way to set this multi aside from changing the cpu or perhaps doing a bsel mod. Memory also has a huge impact on score, especially mhz because most boards give you extremely limited timing controls.
But anyways this way that it scales with FSb despite no reading showing it would be why cpu oc seems to increase score a lot. I had to read through documentation from Intel with the help of mickulty to figure out how clocks work for Gma.
-
Should be a box to tick for cores unlocked right?
-
I've always saw it as separate by model number and arch, not step. Once you separate by stepping then you also can separate by tdp which is an even bigger mess. There are chips with same model number, same arch, same process, same stepping but different tdp rating which means likely different binning and they have a different amd part number on the ihs technically but it's the same model number so same category. I think trying to separate those out would be a mess, and stepping (which is already a mess) would lead to that.
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, unityofsaints said:
I like the idea of a Patreon but right now the only published benefit is a patreon-exclusive competition, which I'm not interested in. If something interesting gets added then I'll be in ?
I think you have it backwards, the idea is you donate out of the goodness of your heart, then they added the comp to thank people for donating. Whether or not you agree with it I think that was the intention.
-
2 hours ago, Louvfx said:
Hello,
I am trying to import a benchmark profile to use to tweak my system, however it keeps saying
" The profile does not match your current processor. It cannot be imported"
Yet the profile appears to have the same processor as mine. (i9 10980xe )
I tried others and the same thing.
Any suggestions?
Thanks!
Lou
Xtu profiles are well broken, basically everything about xtu is.
-
Well said, hopefully getting second can get enough interest that we can get a meet organized in the US.
-
3
-
-
Blame lack of sleep, uploaded valid while subbing then never attached to score https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/55888989
-
@Leeghoofdplz remove, subbed to wrong category
-
Scrolling screenshot didn't take well, so made scrolling gif https://i.imgur.com/kQh4BeU.gif
-
https://i.imgur.com/kQh4BeU.gif tried scrolling screenshot and it was weird, so here's scrolling gif, insane imc and fclk on renoir, 2500 is probably possible
-
5 hours ago, cnkzlyr said:
Hi guys!
I saw a post by Tomcatciller that he was talking about an overclocked Intel Atom N550 cpu. Also on web, I saw some OC results (records) which says 1500 mhz to 1900mhz.
I have hp mini 210-2200st netbook which have
Windows 8.1 x86
Nm10express motherboard, Intelatom n550 x64 based cpu 1,5 ghz, Intel gma3150 gpu and 2gb ddr3 ram
I want to overclock it with setfsb. Tried ICS9LPR427AGLF pll as @tomcatciller recommends to some other person on his thread but it always giving me pll bythe error
How can I overclock it?
Thanks in advance, sorry if a noobic question it is.
The pll is on the mobo not the cpu, you would have to see what pll chip is on your mobo. It should be near a crystal occilator.
-
Summed it up perfectly
-
13 hours ago, unityofsaints said:
Any particular reason wPrime is getting canned?
Seriously?
-
29 minutes ago, IvanCupa said:
Same image as 1st post?
RIP my CB R15 reference & point. ?? Will now try get used to CB R20 & R23 for my reference data.
Not a fan of y-Cruncher since the beginning (ROG OC Showdown 2015 / 2016?!), it's heavy like HWBot x265 4K, maybe even more. But I think I can live with that 1B.
TSE Phy, how it's affected from the the memory settings? As good as 3DM11 / TS Phy?
Personally I often use TS Phy to compliment the Geekbench & substitute of 3DM11 Phy. AFAIK As it's behavior mostly the same, due to similar physics program library (Bullet Physics). CMIIW
But okay, I guess.Tse is similar, just heavier and scales to more thread. Maybe uses avx, I know you can make it use up to avx512 with custom settings but idk what it does stock.
Ycruncher is mostly heavier than x265 4k, which isn't a bad thing, especially cause it uses avx512 which no other bench on the bot does currently afaik. At higher core counts its mostly about how fast is your mem, on 3175x it was zero core scaling on water 100% mem scaling. And it was so held back by mem that core temp went up 10c from a mem oc just from extra core utilization. Lower core counts scale more with core clocks
-
1
-
-
16 hours ago, unityofsaints said:
Looks like the x265 stage has been configured back to a simple average score again?
Its supposed to be
-
1
-
-
3 hours ago, Mr.Scott said:
I-ram?
Personally I have no issues with it cause it's hardware, also it isn't necessary faster than ssds anyways. But not sure how leeg feels. Hopefully storage isn't that big a deal anyways as it's only part of a subtest, and gpu shouldn't matter much as no game test in express.
-
Also a side note, I'm sure you've done it but we'll make sure ramcache is banned on pcm10 right?
Splave - Core i9 10940X @ 4700MHz - 17sec 534ms y-cruncher - Pi-1b
in Result Discussions
Posted
Assuming his pretesting doesn't lead to later massive scores lol