Maxi

All fixed on this page; please note we do not typically block scores over 1 year old for missing verification. maxi

LOL Rich, they happen to the best of us

Page 35/36 fixed - except for Chimera post #351 & potapicus post #354. No more time right now... BTW potapicus, invalid cheksums are not sufficient to block old scores, there was a problem with wPrime some time back and these results are OK.

Hi grp, HOF requires an ORB link - sorry no exceptions. If you can publish the project there is no problem. Thnx, maxi

Are you asking for your password?? You can always retrieve a lost password from the login page Go here -> http://www.hwbot.org/forum/login.php?do=lostpw

No need to apologize harley I happen to agree with you 100%. HWBot did not until recently create clearer rules governing Team sharing and is working hard (and have been) to create the fairest benching & scoring system out there. Suffice it to say that we are looking at this situation closely. We do appreciate your input on this. maxi

I'm glad he's addicted, keep it up Massman!

Have you tried installing the monitor drivers?

Impressive SF, good work! Watch out, my 7600GT is ready for some action

Performance Product - used for Super Pi charts

The other way it could be done is simply showing pp in the statistics of each score, that would be a real nice addition and a quick reference to each board/setup/skill of each users result

I like this idea. 16M might be better, it's harder to pass than 32M in some cases.

klopcha & turricane, all fixed. Thanks for reporting.

HWBot does not prohibit the use of hardware Ram disks (i-Ram). There will be a front page post made shortly regarding this, all users with existing scores will be asked to provide backup verification with a screen shot or by screen capping the project in their project manager. All of the above links were valid at one time and we are not changing our stance based on FM's lack of consistency.

Hi demos, This is wrong and has nothing to do with us. The calculation used to give a score is as follows - from page 23 FM Whitepaper 3DMark05 score = (Game Test 1 * Game Test 2 * Game Test 3)^0.33 * 250 Most people usually only run the tests that are required to get a score, so please do a little research before rolling your eyes at us. If you want to do this yourself and you have the free version, simply hit Esc after Canyon Flight, the third game test. Maxi

Thanks for reporting.

The correct use/spelling is 'burgled' Rich It isn't justified in my view, but I also wasn't there. I think alot of online commentary is bs anyway, it's simply used to get attention.

Interesting report klopcha, I like your style of repoting here on the forums rather than via the DB. Results missing certain details will not be blocked at this time, however the changed default settings results are of course not vaild (I'm sure OPP just missed the detail when he was collecting old scores to submit). The other reported scores have been moderated or edited as necessary. Thanks again, maxi

I'd let her a ride in my car

We only remove PCMark 05 results with software ram disks, feel free to use them in any other bench test.

Have fun machining that, might want to keep some LN2 on hand for cooling during the process

I know but the kiddies can come in here! -- not that they can't find this stuff all over the net We do think about this kind of thing a little differently over here, your right, there's nothing to fear with boobies!

Hi Predator, There are plans for a new version, not sure when or if it will be complete. Obviously everyone would benefit

Perfect is subjective. Should this be in the public forums

Fixed, thanks for reporting Mind.