Maxi

No one can argue with results posted with both so even though smtn isn't in the HOF I wouldn't change what you're doing

Did you verify your login as RB suggested?

Yes HOF only at this time Monstru.

Hey loonym, For hwbot, a result submitted with both an ORB URL and screenshot is ideal for the reasons you point out, but scores are not blocked when submitted with an ORB link only. In cases where a user submits only one form of validation, an ORB link is preferred over a screencap because it uses an online validation system. For this users other results (resolution for example) please use the report feature as usual. regards, maxi

Have a litle patience, our moderation cue is rather large at the moment. We'll get up to these as soon as possible. Regards, maxi

Hi David, You posted that bench March 1st, the rules page(s) we're updated May 15th. I have verified your score. Regards, maxi

The only difference is Keene supports AMD's x86-64 implementation, that does not warrant another category. You're welcome.

Thanks xtom, I like your thinking :ws: It would be great if it didn't have this problem and I think it's clear what HWBot rankings are all about - a fun a fair competition among friends. Unfortunately some people do not treat it that way. The one thing I find particularly troubling is when people use the excuse 'other teams are bending the rules' to justify their actions. Don't let other people decide how you will participate, don't let other people push you to abuse the rankings. Compete fairly and HWBot will do the rest.

It's there, a bit mis-named CliXor

Done, enjoy.

Results for this processor go into this category.

Already there. CliXoR

Results for this CPU (Coppermine & Celeron) go into this category.

Done, enjoy.

Done, Enjoy

Done, enjoy

Please provide a CPU-Z image of this processor.

Done. FYI, High priority takes longer

Done, have fun

Done, have fun.

We are very busy at this time, please be patient. I am sure RB will look at this situation further as soon as he has the time. I would also suggest you check compatability with HWBot before upgrading your forum software next time. Regards, maxi

Hi Joe, If the results posted by you and No Name were run on the same system, the results should only be posted to one account. The number of chips, cards ect. does not matter at all. HWBot prefers in any joint bench session(s) that the results are posted to a team account so they are categorized properly. Alternatively, they may be posted to a single user account, but never more than one account. Thanks, maxi

It was reported, results not including resolution that are less than 1 year old are routinely blocked for this reason. I know it sucks but we all have to play by the same rules. Make sure you show the res & bench settings in the future so you do not waste any valuable benching time, or better yet save the result always

Yes it is allowed, in fact when benching together with other team members, it is preferred to use a group account for those results. It's more a problem when multiple accounts recieve results from a joint session, the group account is designed to catagorize the results correctly and minimize abuse of the team rankings.

They may not be running XP, Vista can be switched to Classic theme which looks like XP/2000. Do you have a link to the score or a screen shot?