Maxi

What is the question exactly? Please make a concise post about the problem and what you'd like the crew to look at. thanks, maxi

Lamer, Please do not go in search of points by reporting a score(s) simply because they do not appear to follow the rules. If a score is suspicious or looks out of place then yes, it's perfectly fine to make a report. Thanks, maxi

But your results were not entered into the DB before the cut off. If your results were originally placed/scanned in a hwbot thread on your forum (prior to the rule change) it would be different. Given the infomation we have now, we cannot verify those.

In reference to this result? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703055 If so the reason is it was not scanned on a forum, the moderator (Massman) had no idea of the forum post you are linking to here.

It doesn't. Follow the forum link and check the post date

Sure if you have a contact. Going thru their support email (which it appears eva did) is a different story. Lot's of people reported unanswered email 6 or so mo ago.

They did eventually listen and implement the 220 cap allowing the use of i-Ram's while still preventing ram disks, that was a good thing. I'm more stunned tha someone actually got a reply from Futuremark at all

Hi Droni, If it's not your system, you cannot post a result with it.

Hi Gomer, Please respond to this thread when you have a moment. http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showthread.php?t=2484 Thanks, maxi

Doesn't matter, two accounts from the same person are not allowed.

And ORB link is sufficient but both are preferred.

You are not required to have an ORB link for top 20 that's true, I always save one because it never hurts to have one. Can you do another run and save the result file? That way we can all see what's going on

Do you have an ORB link Barron?

Why can't we ask hard questions from time to time? Overclockers can't handle a little heat? So you have to field a few questions, big deal. The one aspect of all this that I find troubling is that TaPaKaH is a self admitted 'cheater' - banned from both XS & hwbot at one time because of it. That taken with all the current happenings doesn't inspire much confidence. He seems like a nice enough guy but that doesn't change why we're all here. I've always liked mr.lobber, mainly from posts @ XS, and I can almost go with his word. However it seems the best way to resolve this to everyone's satisfaction is by one of the methods hipro suggested. If it were me I'd do my best to take one and work with hwbot to answer the questions so we can all get back to business. Tell him to put a shirt on next time

Already there, zero results.

Last two are verified, the '01 still needs verification.

Got a GPU-Z shot?

Fixed thanks for the report.

Try this: http://hwbot.org/init.results.search.do

I looked at your bot configs, this appears to be a problem with the version on your forum. In that case it may be awhile unfortunately. The fix requires development time and as far as I know we have no current schedule for updating. Please check hwbot compatibility before updating your forum software in the future. There is of course one possible fix, downgrading the forum to a previous version that is working with hwbot.

AMD X2 4850e has been added, the correct cpuz validation helps when making processor requests.

It's all good, thanks tiborr

I verified that for you tiborr, ATI tool is an OK substitute just like Rivatuner when needed. I do have a request for you; in the future try not to take that tone with the mods here. With the number of reported result we have to comb thru it just isn't very cool to do that, not to mention you're much more likely to get help if you don't.

No one can argue with results posted with both so even though smtn isn't in the HOF I wouldn't change what you're doing

Did you verify your login as RB suggested?