chew*

The result was not possible at the screenshot speed. GT2 looked bugged.

scaredy cat. I will make you a deal, let him use whatever voltage he thinks is necessary with "AIR" on the ram.........if they die I will personally RMA your set.

Had I never oced cpu ever , I might be inclined to. Was actually prepping to run vantage on a 480 and was lazy so used software in windows to calculate scaling. Having killed it I swapped in a dud sempron. Same exact thing. I'm used to it this week by now, can't wait till sunday is over, bad luck week for me. Stars are not alligned in my favor. $2000 in hardware deaths, not a happy camper.

Motherboard bug alert. Biostar TA785GE 128M Basically with a specific bios, umm check Elgappos result, its same bios. ( 07/01/2010 ) Boot stock defaults. Install biostar T clock utility. Reboot. Run fsb up in windows with utility from default 200 to 205 bus apply and congrats you have just killed your sempron 140. Tested on 2 cpu's so yes its confirmed, any takers to try on other model cpu's be my guest, i'm straight having killed 2 cpu's testing bug.

6000 mhz + ram? oops?

Boards doing fine, ram I want to use not cooperating. Congrats G, I will have to take another stab at vantage.

opty actually it does apply to Xp starup only. Read the rules or just check massmans post as there is no point in contesting this.

IE is still faster than them all if thats the case But yah i'm not playing this round. Don't have the correct hardware. I dunno ask massman, I think the cap is for Xp startup only mate, and software ram drives are illegal even the mere suggestion of using one is not something I would be doing, hardware ram drives are fine. I guess you want to contest this result to, and this one and this one......seems hwbot is not banning scores...........bottom line reason is it's done with "real hardware" not in software. http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/1064101_adw_2010_pcmark05_team_pcmark_2005_core_i7_980x_38080_marks http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/1063063_pro_pcmark_2005_core_i7_980x_36198_marks http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/1059805_stevero_pcmark_2005_core_i7_980x_35511_marks

Guess you missed the 5 acards under the green card laying on a bag

Actually its not.......see my comment in his result if you have any questions. Sometimes its best to look before leaping. 5 acards stacked, looks like he's "warming up" ( massman loves that phrase )......only looks like 2 are on for that run

Ok mister, you just added yourself to next video in roundabout way

Damnit, Well, technically that was just a warmup because it wasn't an effecient run.

George I only think this worls with explorer

wait a sec, you just told me your were Belgian.....now i'm confused O_o

I just managed to set a new WR by beating massman. video evidence up in a little while. EDIT Here's the proof. "> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecv47rLXPMA

You and massman chatted on the phone.......miracles never cease to amaze me

Wonder how movieman got to 5.2 on air

No need to know that before hand, had you used your 5850 as if you remember we pretested and it was 500 points lower in vantage, you would have earned a whopping 0.1 points. The purpose was to get the best result for the "team" comp. see here >>> http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/1063828_chew_3dmark_vantage___performance_radeon_hd_5870_10531_marks note .01 points No 1 in there right mind benches sempron for 3d boints If you want points we bench your 5850 on the gulftown rig next time not the sempron rig

You have never slammed the living hell out of a crappy chip before than. Cpu changed the bottom ID like 5 times on me and reinstalled like 5 times while benching.

brand of ram is listed above in the dram info

It's a shame to see you leave Sampsa. It was a priviledge to bench with you in person at CES.

OK pieter after having slept on this and having a clear head now, I really don't have an answer on how to stop it....... Tbh i'm disgusted with benching for boint's myself and my focus has been no longer on it for a while now. Unfortunately 99% of software we use can be cheated, when one door is closed someone will eventually pick the lock on another door. I think even if we did have an answer however ( like some sort of verification ) that still does not change the fact that any previous damage done to the rankings via hw sharing will remain unfixed.

guess we are back to square 1 then :shrug:

Sure now would be a good time to make an example. Ban anyone you have evidence on.......Others will think twice.