GeorgeStorm
-
Posts
1357 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
13
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by GeorgeStorm
-
-
-
1 hour ago, KaRtA said:
5.6g is very nice. Of all the ones I binned I didn’t see one that could go that far. Did you have a temp on the water out of interest?
How many did you bin?
-
Seems to have points now, may just take a little while.
-
@havli can you explain why it kills them in the way it does? Killing something whilst running a bench is something everyone is aware of, chips dying after being shut down without issues having run x265 make little sense to anyone, and that is the issue.
-
1
-
-
-
The issue is the way it kills hw, I've never heard of benches that run no problem, you can save scores etc, then shut down after the session, but when you try to use the CPU again it's dead. That seems off to me, but maybe it happens with other benches as well? Killing a CPU whilst benching is fair enough, them dying after benching whilst off seems wrong.
-
45 minutes ago, TASOS said:
Yes
I agree that is not relative to the point algorithm.
But it's an example of "not fair handle" in between similar facts about team points.
In case 1 , we dont want TPP from inactive members
In case 2 , we award teams with HTPP and GTPP , for non existent benchmarks and buggy benchmarks too.
I dont know if you undestand what i'm trying to say here.
EDIT : i was referring to ucbench and hwbot prime
I see your point and agree, in that if you're going to remove TPP from inactive members, TPP in general should be looked at (in terms of what benches get it, much in the same way it's regularly looked at for hw and global points)
-
You could end up with some kind of 'retired' league, where users are put when inactive, so you can still see where they would rank etc, but the 'main' leagues are full of only active benchers, would make them more dynamic/relevant without 'losing' anything?
-
2
-
-
Impressive looking chip!
-
1 hour ago, unityofsaints said:
"stock"?
Fixed
-
Have you checked contact?
-
1
-
1
-
-
13 minutes ago, Gigelz said:
agree. why you should burn the pins, because you are too lazy to cover them ?
That is exactly the reason
-
1
-
1
-
-
10 minutes ago, Cautilus said:
I'd rather be competing with ice buckets/chillers than people on SS/cascade/dice in the "non-LN2" league with some of the proposals put forward here.
But you're already competing with those people, everyone competes with everyone? You can filter the rankings to only include certain types of cooling if you want to, change leagues/league names doesn't change the number of points people have relative to each other. If you were 2nd in apprentice league, you'd still be 2nd out of people just using 'apprentice' cooling even if the apprentice league was no longer a thing, just that ranking wouldn't appear on your profile, just the overall ranking no?
-
2
-
-
Because one of the main issues with the league split is verifying the cooling, and since if you can't verify the cooling, it nullifies the point of the league split.
Maybe if all achievements were changed from xth position in league to xxxx points people wouldn't mind? If you're improving your points and your overall position, why does it matter if it's out of a small subset or the total group?
-
2
-
1
-
-
10 minutes ago, jab383 said:
Why should I bother to compete if there is no "Apprentice" league? It's even worse for enthusiasts who use no active cooling. In my opinion, mixing the cooling techniques into one league does not force enthusiasts and apprentices to upgrade to LN2, it forces us out of competition.
When I used my SS for the first time I was put in extreme, competing against LN2 etc, obviously I had no chance, but I was still improving my own ranking.
Your points won't change, just everyone will be ranked together (excluding elite).
Depends how much people care about being #1 in Enthusiast/Apprentice etc, rather than just being compared to everyone, and which matters more, rank or number of points.
-
From memory, there were 2/3 leagues when I joined (extreme and not, and then maybe sponsored).
When I came back there were suddenly many more, whilst I understand it to a degree, as others have said, proving cooling is a nightmare, and probably causes more issues than it solves.
I do think it might be nice keeping the novice/rookie league, as a way for new members to have a more granular/relevant ranking.
-
3
-
-
3 minutes ago, richba5tard said:
@bigblock990 thanks for noticing, fixed. I find your suggestion very reasonable not to make competition points count for career rankings. All in favor?
I swear that idea has been put forward multiple times in this thread
But yes please.
-
Yellow truly is the strongest colour?
-
Great work! Get that cpu cold :D
-
Recalc didn't work so removed the offending subs.
-
2
-
-
Please don't upload incorrect rig pics as it only confuses things, scores look ok to me, but it would stop these kind of reports in the future.
-
Yeah, I think 32bit cpuz only shows up to 32 threads or something.
-
1 minute ago, richba5tard said:
One can argue if you did the 100m sprint in 8 sec last year, but did it in 9 sec this year, you are not better than someone who did it in 8.5 sec this year.
I know the comparison does not fully make sense, but still a topic that can be discussed.
True, but the argument I was saying was if you ran it 8.2 this year, you beat them, but since you didn't beat your best ever it wouldn't count?
Unless I'm misunderstanding how the points would be calculated in which case ignore me
-
32 minutes ago, richba5tard said:
Yes, as in any sport! You are always comparing to those who participate in that season.
The point of the example was the idea that it wouldn't work like that
That since User A had better scores in the past, he would get nothing despite beating User B this 'season;
david azulay - Xeon E5 1650 v3 @ 4670MHz - 6min 55sec 30ms SuperPi - 32M
in Result Discussions
Posted