GeorgeStorm
-
Posts
1357 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
13
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by GeorgeStorm
-
-
Likely combination of all. Gigabyte P45 boards aren't exactly a symbol of efficiency, plus your OS might not really be optimised for 1M. You're not even running it minimised.
Fair enough I assumed it would probably be both
My knowledge of tweaks etc is very limited, I'll try to do some more research before I run this next time
The OS is the Perica_barii XP, but I have used it on multiple systems because I'm lazy so I guess it's lost a lot of any efficiency it once had.
-
Awesome CPU!
But the time is quite slow. You should be in 8.775-8.825 range at these clockspeeds.
Thanks, was just a random chip, only one I have.
That doesn't surprise me, efficiency has never been my forte hah.
It's definitely something I'll be trying to beat next session (if I can get the chip to work at those speeds again!)
Software or mem causing it do you reckon?
-
Awesome DDR2 mem clocks!
Thanks!
Didn't spend too long playing about as the jump to 3rd is quite a bit, not sure how much extra I could get from chip/mem in terms of speed.
Run was with no wazza because I only had one partition on the drive
-
-
I love how all someone has to do is be a dick and somehow thats immediately "facts" or "hard truths".
It is not. Im not going to be affraid to bring up issues because a few guys who benefit from the status quo are happy with the lopsided way things are. Intel is purchasing the leaderboard by allowing specific overclockers to benchmark hardware they have no intention of releasing soon in order to bury their competitors launches and create an image. We used to call those ES samples but intel is side stepping that as well. There needs to be rules to keep bullies like intel (who has a long history of shady behavior) from manipulating the leaderboards like this.
It is a problem and i will continue to bring it up.
Be a dick all you want but THOSE are the facts.
As a general rule I'm on your side, but it's not really Intel doing it as far as I'm aware, as Splave mentioned it's actually motherboard manufacturers who are supporting various overclockers and possibly providing them with cpus etc.
-
Nice score and that is one good looking setup!
-
Great to see you back at it!
-
I believe Dragon took it
-
-
Nice chip, should be able to get that quite a bit faster
-
-
The score is 365.1
-
Than it's worse than i thought.
Hwbot is going downhill fast...
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
To be fair I think it's been like that as long as I've been a member.
-
1
-
-
I think people can use the same cpu for 3d benches, and the same gpus for 2d benches type thing.
But you can't share the same 'active' component (cpu for 2d and gpu for 3d).
-
1
-
-
Example?
As far as I'm aware hardware sharing isn't allowed (on active components)
-
Impressive stuff as always!
-
Thanks
Hopefully next time I'll be able to push the cpu a little more, was afraid of it crashing as I had so little LN2 I didn't want to have to heat up and then cool down again etc. -
Thanks
Not really planned, just kept bumping bclk in 0.5mhz jumps, expecting it to fail each time and it went much further than I thought it would!
-
I think it might go higher with a better pot and more Vcore. I tested 68/61 @1.85v, but would not pass at that speed. It seems there is no scaling going from 4/4 to 2/2 with this L640 CPU, so next run will be 4/4.
Yeah I saw your FB post, a new pot would be a worthwhile investment I think
Hopefully next time you can get gold.
-
Nice run mate!
Thanks
Hopefully first will come next time! -
-
Hah thanks
Turns out it looks like I had possibly the worst mount ever (literally only half the cpu was touching the pot) so hopefully I can have another crack at this and aim for gold -
Fair enough, I'll keep an eye out on the off chance
-
Great score, anything left in the cpu?
Everyday all day submissions from unreleased Intel processors
in Offtopic
Posted
One could argue since not allowing xeons in competitions?
Or even since having any kind of competition.