Strunkenbold

Will someone ever make a submission with those cards? Well anyway, to complete the hardware db: https://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/quadro2_go/ https://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/quadro4_500_go_gl/ https://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/quadro4_700_go_gl/ https://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/quadro_fx_go700/

Sorry took a while. https://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/luke_corefusion_800mhz/ https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/epia_ek8000eg/

https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/8615/

Wasnt that a requested "feature" Pieter wanted? I just cant remember which problem he tried to solve...

https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/802a/

Soldered, are you sure? Anyway I removed the MXM suffix from the category name, https://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce_gtx_1060_notebook/

https://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/celeron_e3900_es/

Trident Z Royal was already added in the meantime. The rest got added now. Still no possibility to add PSUs.

Complete Coffee Lake H refresh line up is now in the db.

You do your analysis on base of programs that simply never show the correct results except the CPU is at its standard configuration? We talk about an 8 year old result which was made for 2 points and took almost one hour two finish and accuse him that he used a different CPU to be #1 in this category? Really? For me that doesnt make sense. So thats why Im asking if this is physical possible? Those bugged programs doesnt proof anything. IMO

Isnt it possible that he runs his CPU with 50Mhz FSB? Its kinda hard but should be doable. I really wouldnt trust cpuchk, as its possibly kinda confused with the configuration. Anyways Im open for other opinions.

Its really great that you are still trying make the database as correct as possible. Really didnt know about this.

https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/ga_k8vm800m/

Seems you already found the correct category: https://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/mobile_radeon_r7_graphics_wani_ddr4/ There were just some people submitted results with desktop parts, sorry I dont have time to move those over, please just report them.

Might be a good idea to get in contact with the boys from CPU-Z. I guess they would be quite interested to get some information from those rare systems. https://www.cpuid.com/contact.html

I think he meant that the first post of this page needs an update. @richba5tard Could you fix the first post? (and hopefully take this forum thread on someday to the main page)

Its already there. Even it might be a little bit hidden. https://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/radeon_r5_m330__m430__radeon_520/

Damn I could swear I catched all of those K10 CPUs. But hey, there was also the 615e missing. https://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/athlon_ii_x4_610e/ https://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/athlon_ii_x4_615e/

I was always looking at this list: http://holicho.lib.net/wcpuidv3/wcpuidv3.htm I saw some special made boards and they used TurboPLLs on Tusl/Cusl and ST6. https://web.archive.org/web/20020613021345/http://isweb32.infoseek.co.jp/computer/atomoc/mb_st6.htm https://web.archive.org/web/20030829142535/http://www.bekkoame.ne.jp/ha/id25302/cusl2.html https://web.archive.org/web/20021016083001/http://holicho.lib.net/ But youre correct. Using this on boards which cant run bus speeds asynchronous just dont make sense. So after looking into this today, I think the only fixed input from the pll is for the clock / system time and they used the pll ic to remove the limit of the onboard pll ic. And some have fixed frequency for usb an ps/2. I think I got this wrong for some years now. So today I really learned something. Now you and other achieved over 260 Mhz without any pll mods. So this makes me wonder why the japanese boys were so keen on those turbo plls if its actually possible without.

Didn't some of them did a pll mod for their boards? I guess that should completely take out the problems with the PCI/agp bus. Thanks for your suggestions. Wish I had time to overclock those systems again.

I used many IDE drives in the past and every of them managed to let me achieve over 200 MHz FSB. If you struggle at 155 MHz, it's most likely your CPU. Only a few CPUs manage over 200 MHz on air. Most need at least SS to achieve this. But for some it's just impossible. I appreciate all those great tips in this thread. I really never thought that those cheap IDE to SATA adapters are able to handle the high PCI clocks very well. Even though I own such things, I was always too lazy to try out.

Ah now I see this. Yes this is an old bug. Appeared already multiple times in the past. IMO it's a problem how the bot handles name strings. For some reason the bot isn't able to handle exact strings. If there is something similar, it just chooses this It's like the search engine had always a bug if you search for users. Like you search for submissions from user "blablabla". If there is also a user "Blabla". The bot just shows subs from him. But the are no results from the actual "blablabla" query.

This is correct. Raven CPUs are Zen gen1. AMDs Marketing Team decided to give them 2000er numbers. Zen+ aka Zen gen 2 will have 3000er numbers BTW.

Well the problem of global and wr points is that they are really big. While you just can get maximum 50 hardware points, it is possible to receive over 160 points for globals and 170 points for worldrecord points. In other words an active bencher which posts some high quality scores with big points can be #1 in career ranking and in seasonal ranking at the same time and he can achieve this in some months (hypothetical). I think the career ranking should reflect the effort made over some longer time and not just some months. Currently those 30 slots for hardware / global / WR fill up too quickly with current made results because global / WR points have a so much bigger influence. Regarding comp points: I think its sad that the effort made in previous years diminishes. Seasonal ranking gives the chance to see the current level of a bencher while career shows what he did over the time. Its 10 slots for those points. If we shift up hardware point slots it should not have a too big impact anymore.

Well the point is that I didnt see too much constructive criticism in this thread. Just complaints. If you want that Frederik does change something in your direction you have to give him something he can work with. I mean it should be clear if Frederik just receives negative feedback of his work, he probably doesnt see the point to spend time on hwbot. Which ultimately means that hwbot close his doors forever.