Strunkenbold

http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/22a4/

Already added but did not drop a message here: http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/veriton_m480/

http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/p4dp6/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/winfast_k8m890m2ma_rs2h/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/865g_micro_775/

Some points: 1. Yes Im aware that the exclusion of Windows 10 is a big problem. This already hurts this platform for sure. And of course the issue is getting bigger and bigger and can be potentially mean the death of hwbot in the long run. 2. Christian Ney basically makes a longer break for some time now and its even uncertain if he ever returns. He had the most knowledge on this issue. So everyone else from the team has to get in touch with problem first and as I already said, I dont even have the hardware. So testing different platforms and looking for loopholes will take time and money (and Im actually quite sure nobody has the time). 3. We are in no way interested in harming the competition between Intel and AMD. The whole idea of overclocking is to get more for less. AMD has products again who follows this idea. You spoke a lot about AMD gaining market share because they finally have good products again and thats fine. I really do appreciate that. But they are responsible if they want to compete here on hwbot. Basically it means they have to find a solution. That doesnt mean we hate them. But of course we were left alone here and their ignorance costs us time and money. And both is something the bot doesnt have anymore. 4. I appreciate your input on this issue. But its really problematic. And its actually like @yosarianilives already said, you would need to build wrappers around a lot of benchmarks, which costs extreme amount of money. There were already plans to do something like that btw but the costs were considered as too high. 5. The addition of GPU-PI in the screenshot verification would complicate the rules even more and I really fear that its too much for the user. There are already so many subs without any sign of CPU-Z or GPU-Z and I really dont know how it could help here to add one more thing on the list of needed apps to have a valid screenshot for hwbot. 6. The bot lacks human resources. I just can tell you that Im not in favor of any additional screenshot verification because we have not the staff anymore to reproduce questionable results. And its really too easy to cheat here. Copy & Paste a shot of GPU-PI and Photoshop your result on a black background is basically a 2 mins job. So things are simply not safe enough for competitions. So in the end I dont need to ask for a complex verification screenshot if I cant trust the result anyway. Im really sorry but in the current situation the bot is not able to to take even more work on his and its staff. We actually have to simplify things and reduce workload. So the only real solution is that everybody should get in touch with AMD and report this bug to them. The more people the better.

No its was just a typo. Bonus Stage now open too!

This seems like a good idea. But it needs excessive testing on many platforms and the usage is quite limited. I dont own any Ryzen so somebody else would need to spend some time in this. One major drawback is that while GPU PI provides results as a datafile, every other bench just uses screenshot verification. It should be no problem for someone who wants intentionally cheat to copy and paste such a GPU PI window or simply reclock his machine. The problem here is that the screenshot just shows the clock after the benchmark but we should actually need to know how the clock was during the run. So it would be no solution for competitions and global points. It could be a solution for casual benchers but it would also mean additional steps for the screenshot and it seems that CPU-Z / GPU-Z is already problem, now we speak about people have to open GPU-PI to submit a SuperPI result. All in all it is a bug which either AMD or MS needs to fix. I understand that this has ultra low priority for them but it basically makes benchmarking with Win10 a no go for us.

Usually I see things only in the support section. I dont have much information on those rare SoCs, if you could compile a list with information's and a CPU-Z verification, we should be able to add it.

Just talked with the guys from CPU-Z, the link is correct but cant be seen by public because its set to private. You have to go to your profile and disable the private mode.

I guess its this: http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/winfast_mcp61dm2ma_8ers2h/ The interesting part is the sticker under the WinFast marking.

Your link is not working.

Removed the line with "only desktop processors". AFAIK there is no server hardware for Socket 754 anyway. I also added a new restriction for single GPU only.

Sorry I didnt read the preparation thread. So you basically want to allow everything before Geforce 6 ?

Is this a Winfast board? Could you tell me which name the board has? http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/veriton_m480/

Just added stages now, let me know if something isnt right.

crazy :)

Added, please dont report old submissions. They didnt needed to add a picture back then. Unfortunately for us imageshack and 3dm01 ORB went down.

Already added some days ago, but forgot to link it here: http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/at5iont_i/

http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/x11dpi_nt/ @gigioracing Whats the real name of that board?

http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce_gtx_1050_3gb/

@richba5tard Could please add that...

http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/x470_taichi/

http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/2ab7/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/radeon_hd_3000/ ?

@richba5tard ^^ something for you

http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/b360m_mortar_titanium_ms_7b23/

http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/geforce4_mx_440_ddr/