Strunkenbold

Well its already there but I guess you already found it by yourself. http://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/kirin_620/

Jesus, I think I'm a little bit late here but I just want to clear things up. We're definitely not allowing Raven ridge APUs on win 10. Doing so would open just another door to hell and that's something we're definitely do not need. Due RTC bug, the scores are serious broken and can't be trusted at all. No one has the time to verify the integrity of every single result. So just make it clear, Raven Ridge can be benched with the 3DMark suite but that's it.

You can extract those opencl files from any catalyst. Place the dlls in your gpupi directory and your ready to go.

There are for some reason 3 subs left which I cant find, the rest is fixed.

You should still be able to submit with the SoC, if its not in the database please make a request in the support section. Its just the automatic submissions with the hwbot prime app which doesnt work. But hwbot prime is dead anyway.

All I can say is that its really really hard to reach that 1200Mhz. Even if it would be an Orion, it still would be a remarkable result. You need decent cache, a decent core and a motherboard that can reach those frequencies. AFAIK those boards had really big probs to reach 1Ghz stable, so it would be nice if GRIFF could share his experience if he needed to make any mods. Unfortunately no program, as far as I know, can tell us if its an Pluto or not. Its really bad situation again for us. I really would like to reproduce those results but Im not sure I find the time.

http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/x11sae_f/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/ms_b9061/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/h370_aorus_gaming_3_wifi/ http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/tb250_btc_pro/

Should be fixed now.

Some Motivation for you: http://valid.x86.fr/m6gbpe http://web.archive.org/web/20010721223440fw_/http://www16.big.or.jp:80/~bunnywk/

Read this?

Sorry support for mobile phones is pretty much dead.

The bot is a community platform. it is there for the people to share their results. A Team of community members care for moderating and developing the Website. In no way there is a "duty" for the bot. The bot gives you the Chance to have fun and compare your skill to others. The bot is the community and it consists of you and me and all other people here around. The bot isnt making Money on you, as far as I can remember, you are here for free. So I really cant imagine why you think the volunteers working here have a duty against you. By participating in the Rankings, you accept the rules and that means that it is you who have the duty to ensure that your result is valid. In the case you want to report bugs: https://www.cpuid.com/contact.html https://www.techpowerup.com/forums/forums/gpu-z.53/

I don't see problems when using older versions. So it is perfectly fine. Looks like the software from today is simply not made for older systems. It's very bad to see this. Could you possibly play with the CPU-Z.ini and look which option cause the crash? Is this on AMD or Via chipsets?

There are problems, plenty of them. I don't deny them, I know they are there. I'm upset about the CPU-Z bug too. I reported the issue in our forum thread years ago and I really thought that Christian Ney would take care of it, but he didn't. I didn't benched those old systems for a long time, so I forgot about it. But why do all people think it's only a problem of hwbot? CPU-Z is software from an independent developer. Everyone could report the bug to him. Why is that hwbots task? In the end the user has to prove his result is correct. But and that is something which is very common, as long as I have an advantage, I keep calm. If I got an exotic GPU with more shaders than the regular category, I just submit. If I got a card with less shaders and I can't compete, I request a new category. If I have a smartphone which got incorrectly detected by the hwbot prime app, and receive globals with an octa core soc in dual core ranking, I'm just happy and sing along. If my Pentium mmx shows some more MHz than bios post I'm happy too. As long as everyone tries to find loopholes and keep the advantage for himself, hwbot can't catch up. There were some really fine men though, so I don't want generalize. But sometimes it's really frustrating. Hwbot can't manage 1000+ categories just with volunteers. There will always be something that we didn't saw before, something that we didn't know of yet. So I agree with you that many things went wrong and we can rant about but it doesn't help. As the bot is simply lacking the ressources. If you want to help post problems _before_ the comp ends. If you see problems with 3rd party apps, report it to their authors and let the community know about it. That's the only way I know of that can work. The only other option would be one or two people get employed by the bot. As we already know now by the failed esports experiment, this won't happen.

I slowly learn too. In the last years, my only Task was the database. Now I just stepped in here as I saw that the Cup was already running but nothing was set up.

Yes you're absolutely right about this. I'm sorry that I made this wrong. It would be really great if you guys would speak up next time before the round ends. For now I think, the best compromise is to set the mark to 5%.

As far as Im concerned there was always Drama, in every comp. Also this is not the first time we requested a screenshot for CPU-Z stages. I have to admit that the CPU-Z stage doesnt really Need a screenshot though, its like what @TAGG said: Basically the screenshot requirement prevented suicide runs, turning this into a light stability Benchmark. But I set up the stages on March 16, even gave everyone one day more time, so everyone could comment. including you. Discussing after the comp ended isnt helpful. But some People made submissions according to the rules and some did not. Which leaves the question why we should punish the ones who did. Of course those competitions would better organized if there would be someone solely dedicated to creating stages and moderating submissions. But after websmile left, there is no one. So basically, while I understand the Frustration, a better way to deal with the Situation would be to comment about Problems and make the stuff Aware of it. Thx @TASOS BTW!

Fixed, sorry! Thx for catching this.

http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/vib861s_35_8861_xx/

The actual problem is, nobody else has such rare Hardware like you.

I was told to remove all DDR chipsets. I have to admit, I made a mistake with the CLE266. As SDRAM is the only allowed RAM type it shouldnt caused much damage. I removed now the Aladdin Pro 5T, CLE266 and the SiS 635 those were, AFAIK late P6 chipsets and dont match the comp.

http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/proliant_dl380_g7/

The prime app needs maintenance work. Also there are about 7000 devices in the queue which needed to be added to the db. All categories needs to be cleaned because it really is a mess. Devices got incorrectly detected because of bugs in the app or the website. Also its too easy to fake devices anyway... Issues got reported years ago. Nothing changed. Now it's time to end this horror trip. Hwbot would need 2-3 people working full time on fixing all those issues. This won't happen. @richba5tard please delete all those mobile stuff and save us some server costs.

CPU-Z 1.84 is out now for some days and I can confirm it fixes the bug showing wrong frequencies. It doesnt only affect Pentium Cores, in general all Socket 5 targeted CPUs only have 2 Pins thus anything over 3.5 is bugged.

Sorry I dont add devices anymore.