GENiEBEN

Bad luck brian, score had to be removed as it is bugged (the A<B<C rule).

You did mention 'beta' hardware, just thrown in the 'ES' somewhere in that sentence.

Just like the card itself.

..that is if you're lucky enough to have a platform that can start the benchmark at all )

The rules stated before the competition where that 801/805 are not allowed, they can't change mid-competition even if you're technically correct.

you get a personalized version of Afterburner Extreme Please phrase this to include more than just AB. you have access to special XOC or coldslow VGA bioses ...that are otherwise publicly not accessible, as we know there are plenty flying around. you receive hardware for reviews, which you afterwards use for your overclocking you receive hardware for the sole purpose of overclocking what stops the user from lying/writing a quick review? your friend gives you a version of afterburner extreme bad call, does that mean I can unlock the regular AB and share it?

http://url.hwbot.org/1nfpKom The CPU-Z validations do not count multiple times.The other 'missing' one is the Wprime32, with which you also have two scores using same hardware.

^^ Someone from US told me about when she went to Italy and at a gas station she saw a guy pull a lighter and start smoking. Any minute she was expecting the 5-0 but to her surprise they didn't show. She didn't get why I was laughing.

If you submit the whole suite of benchmarks (counting just 2D) then you'd have to extend the list to a minimum of 30.

Better yet, on the page of a score there should be a button to 'Upload score using this rig' or something like that.

You missed the reference, she has no idea what they are talking about there, just adds K to anything to sell it.

They missed a great opportunity with this one. [ATTACH]2280[/ATTACH]

Note that you won't even have to wait for an actual recalculation to take part, just press Recalculate then refresh the browser window. It's like the duct tape of HWBOT, it fixes 99% of the issues. Anything else is not worth fixing!

I think I might have reported this before, but now it looks even worse. Screenshot is from Chrome 36, but the same issue is present on IE 12 as well. The issue at hand is because of the exceedingly long hardware name. I don't know much about Java, but a simple string shortening applied if the hardware name exceeds # characters is doable in 10 seconds.

You probably misunderstood what he said. He was referring to the list of benchmarks shown when browsing a motherboard. In that list, his scores are not ranked as "Personal Best" for the given benchmark, Wprime.

The submission does not follow the rules we have for submitting scores. Mainly, you did not include in your screenshot the two CPU-Z windows required - CPU & Memory. EDIT: You've deleted it yourself [4e_MODANTE] manual online submission [4e_MODANTE] modified by owner [4e_MODANTE] modified by owner [4e_MODANTE] modified by owner [4e_MODANTE] modified by owner [4e_MODANTE] instructed delete of crew 4e_MODANTE [4e_MODANTE] modified by owner [4e_MODANTE] modified by owner

Fixed

Turbo button?

It looks for device name/id, not SOC name.

I've taken the liberty of deleting the 7.22 score, the 7.08 one should be ranked in a few minutes. Spi1M should now also be ranked.

^ It has to be available SOMEWHERE, usually that being US/Korea/TW, no paper releases.

New version is on its way, patience. Buzz me on FB when you're not sure about a score, as there are also a bunch of misreported scores.

Face match la device name nu la SoC name. Face un upload la datele dispozitivului automat, trebuie doar sa astepti (cateva saptamani) pana este adaugat.

OS info please?

Fixed.