GENiEBEN

@henkenator: He used SI v4.12 which detects VirtuMVP settings.

XS has a thread about it, google

Putting pieces together...

ofc, ich geniesse es, wieder... Meanwhile playing with this

Done

Why bench on 7 if were back to Luna?

Haha, been top 10 at some point but now Ive been playing it maybe 1week every 6months. 30,5M http://bfbc2.statsverse.com/stats/pc/GENiEBEN/

1. I stand corrected, the misused terms in above posts confused me. 2. Yes. 3. Ofc.

Hmm, now I gotta find out how to check cluster size....

..when you try to make x86 benchmarks run on ARM devices for the sake of something new....

Somehow I already had you on friends list, even tho you only posted ID today wtf

DJ, why is it saying Xeon E7 2860 ?

Wrapper includes subtest scores inside screenshot.

Lol, Ill just move the mouse in a corner to keep you from having to do any physical work. There goes Ney's 1million DPI mouse dream.

I did notice, thought it's more to it than just that. So what is the default value with latest amd driver (or any other)? (on nvidia rig now so I really can't personally check).

I've had the chance to see one on a branded pc, guess it's OEM only?

Not to mention the possible impact on scores of the fair playing people.

I know, will make the leap to Chudnovsky but I don't want to rely on GMP/MPIR This is put on hold now as I have other stuff to finish first.

Ain't nobody got time for that PM me with details, and I can come up with something. Can you also post a comparison score ON/OFF 'tweak' ? This. Now while it's still 'latest', there is a reason why they verify drivers before scores are valid.

No one hates you, or shouldn't based on a honest opinion. You can't expect from people to do that, maybe by the time the wrapper is done they dont have the hardware anymore even tho they wanted to play it fair or w/o any tweaks. A warning after/before posting a score that let's the user know his submission is bound to be verified and validated because it wasn't run with the wrapper sounds more plausible. Relying on the wrapper too much will only drag the REAL FAIR scores down as it has to take cpu cycles away from benchmark to verify against forbidden tweaks. Yes, only VERIFY as I will let you do the whole test 10minutes only to inform you of invalid tweaks found. Scumbag Steve in action. The more nasty stuff you can come up with that takes place during the actual subtests, the lower the final scores of everyone.

I had this on FB, but I know you hate it K404 ..and then I got bored.

While PCM05 is unique in its way, if we were to remove every bench because it's 'cheatable' then we would have nothing left to bench.

Wow this thread exploded and I only missed 1 day. 1. Why would they not be allowed, they are system settings. Curious about CSS/Styles tho. 2. Bob's tweak is a Windows 'bug' and you can see the boost in other software. No reason to ban this imho.

I don't remember his post right now, but I think he was talking about 1. symbolic links, which fall under replaced files category 2. replaced riched & browser, and we all know browser change = no no. 3. registry, all OK here.

^^