Leeghoofd

It's all in the rules... Firestrike not, all the rest yes, they need to be fully UL hall of fame compliant.

Set it average hardware iso per effective core

Nice one lads

If we want to keep valid verifications yes it will be mandatory in 2021

We are dependant the direction 3Dmark takes Ronaldo, not much we can do about it but to explain it to Pasi if they can make it faster or do a CPU Extreme systeminfo check or such

This benchmark is used world wide by review sites and we can't run it accordingly? How bout to kill OC again in a second... we haven't implemented anything and self destruction mode has been engaged already, big sigh. Basic rule is: if you don't like it, don't run it... but don't spoil it for those that want to. If one can't resist to mess things up for others, it will be bye bye, nice to have known you

Well let us set this one straight from the start: if someone clearly abused it he will get a ban, hows that for a motivator? Doesn't one get tired of people messing stuff up for the rest. Why can't one just press the run benchmark button like 99% of the users do.

Not needed during the run ( unless competition specified) You can run the render test from gpuz to show the boost clocks after the run is finished

10.6 beta3 is under testing. Will be released soon by Matt

you can click whatever you want Maxim I don't get all of your request motherboard chipsets had been changed, H61m-k and H61M-p23 work fine here (although slow)

Thing is if we can run it out of the box without messing with encoders, browser versions,. we can show what a hardware overclock can mean for a setup. If we start fooling around we will again shoot ourselves in the foot. Just run the benchmark with more mhz

Well if we go for the Express it doesn't take that long Charles. Maybe a better idea to set globals for the shorter run. Now this would imply users need to get a key though. Fingers crossed users will leave the benchmark alone and just sets clocks and run it for what it was designed for... and not start stupid stuff as with previous versions.

Nice score but plz provide a verification link too, thank you

Current BM 3Dmark scores will be merged with the normal ranking. if you want max scores Win7 is not always the way to go , especially not with old cards, some like XP , some benches prefer Vista.

Integrated into BenchMate 10.6 now Yosi. X265 will follow too

By popular demand: Removed points from the Catzillas and the Heavens Talked to Matt about GPUPI 4.0, perf will be very similar to 3.3 (so they can be merged in the future). Thus we can swap from 3.2 to 3.3, so runs will be a bit less time/ln2 consuming Vantage Extreme will be released and will get hardware points too Any further ideas/proposals

some changes: PCMARK04/05 will no longer get points PCMARK10 will be the Express version, less long to run so more users might chime in on the action Y-cruncher 25M will be removed Cinebench R23 will be used during Pro OC for evaluation, one render only guarded by BenchMate

changed, you are the son of ?

Thx for the heads up , wished you informed us a few hours sooner. Just got word in that Solidton closed his own account.

Hidden FM link Mike

Luumi is gonna contact him as he's moving apparently. EDIT: confirmed that Solidton closed his own account.

sure plz resubmit

Punk Sods deleted his account himself... Solidton from which team was he ? We will check Shane's account tonite. Anyway for the points, those will be overhauled big time, so some users will get less and others will get tons of extra points Q1-Q2 next year

Only members with mail extention @qq.com were accidentaly deleted on sunday afternoon. The current restore point is from Sunday before the fatal script was launched. On the test server we have the situation of yesterday, before the restore was done. No Avalanche user is in that database. @liq_met the wall bug is there since a few months already... @tomekmak, if your scores were dated before sunday 1400, we can recover manually ( the ones with screenshots )

The ideas are cool but it's impossible to define bro: are you a good tweaker because you got every last mhz out of the card or did you just get lucky with a gem GPU. Are you a good tweaker because you can only get 2400Mhz but you are very efficient or was that a once in a lifetime run. Or did the overclockere even downclock to make his run more efficient? We want to simplify the point system, ditch the far too complex algorythms that messed up the rankings the last 3-4 years. The Bot currently does not recalculate all submissions, so it leaves people in the cold. Noone forces you to bench all of them available benchmarks, hence why many just focus on the benchmarks that support globals. First we need to simplify things and highest on the list is to award benchers which are lower down the ranking with more points to motivate them iso this curently installed cut off system. From there on we can evaluate and adapt stuff... but one thing at a time