My issue with HH is especially with the CPU reviews that the benchmark suite is adapted to make the sample shine. Must be one of the sole websites that gave the FX-8150/8350 a silver/gold award. By all means they are not bad CPUs, but there's far better stuff out there. At first glance it looks like HH writes what the PR boys want. Denying at that moment you guys didn't follow the reviewers guide, was the silliest thing to do as I had it laying right in front of me.
I want you guys to do a Corsair H90 review for honesty's sake, till now I know only two websites that got the conclusion nailed correctly.
Secondly I want to test that 2666C10 kit that runs 3000MHz 11-12-12-2t at 1.75 volt. Any sign of stability or just a suicide screenshot ? Never ever is there any proof of stability... either ditch it or do it the right way.
Similar case with the Kingston Hyper Beast 8GB 2400C11 dimms doing 2800MHz ? Darn I got the bad samples again...
Oh btw your forum admins are magnificent, kuddos to them. Any decent input/criticism on the articles gets rapidly censored/hammered,...
I must admit the site looks very nice, but the information spread always put's a too sunny light on the tested product. Looking at the HH rating system, there is close to no bad product out there...
Now bashing other sites work methods and telling you guys are doing it all right just put a big smile on my face ! HH is a big marketing machine and if it works for you guys, great. But plz don't tell other people they are doing it wrong...