People from rest of world have an unfair advantage of having access to higher ambients, which helps HTT on s939 ... so let's ban them as well, while we're at it!
I think the current ES/non-ES rules are laid out in a very sensible manner. If someone wants to use Haswell (=current-gen) ES - welcome to the Pro OC cup where people also have access to quad-Titan and octa-CPU configs ... and let us please not discuss what is fair and what is not in an "everything goes" sort of competition (which the Pro OC cup is).
why not execute it in such a way that haters won't have any ground for asking such questions?
or, another random idea - why not let it run for three weeks and then let it close when activity falls below certain threshold? (measured in, say, new competitors or results per unit of time)
Why not make a competition end at 'random' (at least non-publically-known) time? Say, let it run for 3 weeks and end at 'random' time during the fourth one. This way all the sandbaggers will upload their results at the end of 3rd week, and diehard-hollywood-last second benchers will have all the info plus some extra adrenaline from the competition being able to end on any second
another random idea:
http://hwbot.org/country/league
Why not rank countries in a similar way team are ranked, i.e. by CPP (country power points, analogous to TPP) + UP total / 10 ? ... unless, of course, it's too difficult to implement
There is no objective way to compare pots across all platforms (low/high coldbug, low/high heatload) and all scenarios (low/high delta between benchable temp, CB and CBB) - it's mostly down to personal preference, really.
random idea:
http://hwbot.org/league/hardware_masters
would it be possible to rank people only by their 2D and 3D hardware points? (say, by clicking on "2D points" or "3D points" texts)