Wizerty

Amazing result !!! You lead the "Overclockers League" congratulation I think you have to re-submit this result, or tried to "recalculate" point. Your hardware point are not calculated. and you're not on GTX 580 ranking

C'est surtout que pour unigine le CPU @58G sur 4c/8t suffit, monter la frèquecne doit pas t'apporter beaucoup.

Great chip You realy use your MB full cover ( see picture 2 ) ? Without heatsink on VRM (ok) but VRM cover by iso ? No overtemperature with high Vcore In long run ?

Stock cooling @1200... Lighning or refborad ? Maxout @1200 or you don't push highter ?

You can find a lot of picture in this thread : http://www.jmax-hardware.com/forum/index.php/topic,7327.0.html For this pot look at page2.

Congrats bro, keep pushing

Screen shoot ? Why a screenshoot ? I use aquamark wraper.... start aqua, open GPU-Z, CPU-Z, click take screen, click save result and uplaod this file. I can tried to re-uplaod the file and see if the screen came back. All my 3770k are dead... tomorrow I have a new one, WR come soon. GPU : 1140MHZ / MEM 1140 MHZ, or something. tried to make capmod the afternoon to increase ram speed.

Where is the WR ? No WR, no chocolate

Yes, but no improve. For this screen, IHS is still on the DIE, but for the other ( vantage, 06) IHS is remove

that was really fun . I will try to take back 05 WR this afternoon. Just enough LN2 for one attempt

Juste one... but need zombie on it (see picture). GTX260 lighning have strong VRM, but OVP and OCP triggers very very early 1.2v. I do a 4 VR mod ( OCP / OCP2 / Vgpu and Vmem) but OVP stay... so I tried some softmod, but when I apply Vgpu, frequency back to 2d . With my GTX260 lightning, the only way to push more than 1.2v is zombie mod . So don't use Lightning, ref board are better. I used at least 100l of LN2 with this card to find how to bench it, now I know it well, but I'm out of nitrogen. Next time 3770k with LN2 to

hey, if i've enought ln2, same with 1200mhz gpu, but i've to do 03 and 06 before

Nice you need better chip now.

I put a bottle to keep nitrogen vapor away from the motherboard, but it is totally useless, vapors always falls over. An Air flow is much more efficasse, but it uses more nitrogen: (. Useless, but it's really beautiful to see the vapor rise inside the bottle

Very nice, good job. xsuperbgx : The MB is very important for high FSB

Good job . No CB or CBB issue without IHS ? I have try last month but no way to boot under cold ( big trouble under -100°C ). How many chip did you try before this one ?

Not enought LN2 for your GPU ?

Good job bro Now you must go to the 3d and reach the top 5.

Dommage de pas pouvoir le garder . Christian : J'ai passer 4 CPU pouyr tomber sur lui, et forcmeent, le temps d'iso, changer de CPU... l'après midi est passé très vite, du coup quand j'ai enfin ou un CPU potable c'était l'heure de plier . Puis j'ai fais ça sur un OS pourri par la 3D, possé sur une autre mobo, avec tout les FW, des reg pour la gtx 260.... bref c'est juste du max hardware, il suffit de regarder mon spi32m pour s'en rendre compte. Mais 4 CPU en 4h, on peut pas faire dans la dentelle, je serai tombé dessus en 1er ça aurai changé pas mal de chose. Plus qu'a en acheter un et espérer tomber sur un bon. Mais tu as vu celui de mad et celui de KP, OMG

SS cooling, cascade, DI or nitrogen ?

Happy to see that everything goes fine. Yesterday, I was very angry, I know, there is a lot of bug, but I know my hardware, and I was sur at 10000% that this validation was good..... Thanks a lot to Christian for his investigation. I know it's took him a lot of time, so thank you again. AMD is really fun to clock, I hope that no one try to use any kind of bug to reach an high speed, it cheapens the work of all other overclockers. just_nuke_em says: I'am waiting for you

"I might have answer for this later this week... " Pls, don't

8.4 reach

"So for better overclocking, we have to play BF3 for six months and then try again? :P" Exactly, you can try with "the sims" if you want

Christian : Do you remember which core was better last time ? The 1st module and the last are really bad, something like 7.6 // The 2nd module is not bad, 8.18 Ghz, et the 3rd is good 8.3 + I just remember last time we used the number "3", but 3 = module 2 core 1 or "3" for module 3 core 1 ??