Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

unityofsaints

Members
  • Posts

    3568
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    23

Everything posted by unityofsaints

  1. I am running Win 7 on Threadripper 1950X on the new AGESA, so unless something is fundamentally different about Threadripper 2*** (I doubt it) there's no special support required. Are there no USB drivers for the MSI MEG Creation?
  2. There are 4 chips on total in the Athlon II 64* lineup on socket AM2, here are the CPU World links: Athlon II x4 645 (rev. E0) -> Zosma Athlon II x4 645 -> Propus Athlon II x4 640 (rev. E0) -> Zosma Athlon II x4 640 -> Propus Only the Zosma chips are unlockable and they are also the ones which misreport as Thuban in CPU-Z. The "T" at end of the name seems to be a CPU-Z invention for the Zosma cores, I haven't seen a reference to it anywhere else except on HWBot, which probably got it from CPU-Z ?. I don't have any of these chips in hand at the moment but will send you a validation once I do, tbh I doubt CPU-Z developers have fixed this. Edit: The much more popular 960T BE also has the same issue. I'll validate it on 1.86 in a couple of hours and add the screenshot here.
  3. @Leeghoofd Do you allow the Athlon II X4 645 in the CB11.5 stage? HWBot lists it as Zosma: https://hwbot.org/hardware/processor/athlon_ii_x4_645t_zosma/ ... but CPU-Z actually identifies it as Thuban: I think this is an error in CPU-Z since only native 6-cores are Thuban but we'd like to clear it with you anyway since Thuban is strictly disallowed in this stage. Edit: Athlon II X4 640 (Zosma) has a the same issue.
  4. Just use the Win 7 ISO on the forums, easy as f***
  5. Has money/influence to get a 2990WX but not to buy another 2 sticks of RAM...
  6. @mods it won't let me delete or change the score, plz get rid of this sub
  7. I have 771 Xeons myself and the little plastic adapters but I'm glad we're not talking about modifying a running comp here, this should be avoided if at all possible.
  8. It's an air result, what's the big deal? Not like you wasted 1,000L of LN2
  9. @Leeghoofd just a small thing but stage 5 and 6 are mixed up on the comp pages. Official thread says 5 = 478 + 3DMark 99 and 6 = 939 + 3DMark 2001 but on the comp pages these stages are the other way around.
  10. Is this the 3DMark 11 Physics test or another 3DMark?
  11. Please add the Asrock X399M Taichi. Here are some subs with it: http://hwbot.org/submission/3907375_unityofsaints_memory_frequency_ddr4_sdram_1931.5_mhz http://hwbot.org/submission/3907376_unityofsaints_cpu_frequency_ryzen_threadripper_1950x_4190_mhz
  12. Would you consider postage outside Europe?
  13. Such a shame this no longer gets globals
  14. I imagine the idea behind this stage is to differentiate it from OSiBS. I really don't think it's too hard for a global team to find these chips in time.
  15. If we do this please exclude mobile chips, they're impossible to find.
  16. Great work as always @Leeghoofd I can see a lot of thought has gone into this comp
×
×
  • Create New...