Christian Ney

I got caught :ws:

Nice 9k+ score

Chuck Norris Wins!

I was going to do the same with all CPUs I have, but it takes a shitload of time

GeIL Corsa or AData XPG+ ?

Awesome work/job. :bigthumbsup:

Wrong screenshot here as well

directly from F4 to F7 ? the only change is ''Improve protection mechanism'' nothing else ?

if you want to upload a new picture just PM me or post here and I will change the picture if really it's needed

+1

I love your fix

Purtroppo no, vengo solo visitare i miei nonni

Grazie, ci torno tra due giorni in Italia fino al 30 decembre.

Merry Christmas to all enjoy your gifts

Photoshop

Yeah i7 2700K = i7 2600K +1 I guess it's because he is quite old

hey I was kidding, only massman can reply to this, ain't gonna make the rules now. He will. I don't think there will be ''no rules''

have a valid screenshot

I told massman there were no rules, he ignored me as always

to me it's allowed. At least in the normal ranking, now for country cup I don't know, but I guess yeah. Massman will confirm that

still not bored of pcmark05 ? congrats mate

Over the next few months, Intel will be releasing several server and workstation class processors based on Sandy Bridge. Entry level workstation offerings include E3-1200 v2 and E5-1600, both reliable alternatives to regular desktop offerings. Dual socket processors include the E5-2400 series and the higher performing E5-2600. Finally, we have the quad socket E5-4600 series. We have now seen some initial performance comparisons between Sandy Bridge-EP and Westmere-EP. A document leaked by a Chinese website (PDF file) revealed what sort of performance increase we can expect in Sandy Bridge-EP over Westmere-EP. Various benchmarks were run using an X5690 (with 6 cores/12 threads at 3.46 GHz base clock, 3.6GHz Turbo Clock) and an E5-2690 (8 cores/16 threads at 2.9 GHz), in a dual-socket setup with comparable configuration, except that the X5690 had 40 GB of DDR3-1333 in triple channel configuration and the E5-2680 had 32GB DDR3-1600 in quad channel configuration. Giving the X5690 a baseline score of 1 in each test, we see some interesting results. Both chips have a similar TDP. The X5690 has a core speed 24% higher than E5-2690, but the latter has 33% more cores. Using the synthetic Linpack benchmark to measure matrix multiplication, E5-2690 scored a respectable 2.2. Using OLTP Database (TPC-C Oracle), E5-2690 scores 1.5, while using a middle tier java test (SPECjbb 2005) the score is 1.56. Integer throughput using SPECint_base2006 gives a score of 1.69. Moving to some technical computing tasks, Floating Point Throughput (SPECfp*_rate_base2006) gave a score of 1.82 and Memory Bandwidth (STREAM_MP Triad) scored 1.88. The average performance over these 6 applications is approx 1.78, indicating a projected performance increase of approximately 80% when moving from the high-end Westmere-EP offering to the equivalent Sandy Bridge-EP processor. Comparing the Xeon 5600, E5-2400 and E5-2600 we can see the benefits of the newer systems, and why the E5-2600 series is so powerful. Source: CPUWorld Gallery: http://imup.se/g/BVUoc1 pdf available: https://docs.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0B0BeZFb-M9wCZWJjMGMwMjItNDNlZi00MGI1LWJiNDctZTliOTEwMDhhNGE0 Download all pics : .rar file

yeah: this is ''allowed'' atm

okay thanks for your heelp as always