xXSebaSXx

I knew this looked funky as hell. I looked at it and was like... "How on earth can a Athlon cpu drop a sub 6 second run for Spi?" And then I looked at the screenshot and noticed that it's not 1s 90ms... It should be 1m 09s instead.

Nice!!!! You are making me work for this one aren't you?

@ Opty -> Thanks my man. I'm doing my best to hold OCF at the top of this one. :thup: @ S_A_V -> There is no unofficial patch to get Grammar Check to run. It is just lots and lots of testing and tweaking until I found the place where it runs. @ SHRIMPBRIME -> Sorry... had a bit of a dyslexic episode when typing that one in. I've fixed the score to represent the correct one. As far as how I gained 1000 without OCing... All I can say is this... I spent over three hours tweaking and changing OSs until I got that score.

One more issue I found. When I look up the rankings for PCM04 for AMD 955BEs there is only one entry: http://hwbot.org/benchmark/pcmark_2004/rankings?start=&hardwareTypeId=processor_1859&cores=4 I know that it has to do with the fact that said entry is the only one with a compare URL, but PCM04 online support is gone and there is no way to submit the scores online, so why require the compare url on a bench for which you can't get said url?

Hey guys... This one here: http://hwbot.org/submission/2176268_xxsebasxx_pcmark_2004_phenom_ii_x4_955_be_14875_marks Stuck on "Calculating Rank" for a few days now. I know it's not worth much, but I'm a bit OCD and not being able to see the ranking on there drives me mad. Thanks Sebastian

Heh... I was there for the livestream... Mighty nice chip you got there TJ. Go OCF...

So you ARE saying they cheated... Because I seem to remember this issue was raised and solved already. I thought we had moved from "we suspect they were cheating" to "we don't want October's feelings to get hurt" Because if this whole thing is because you think they cheated; the solution is quite simple... Ask for proof... O wait; that has been done and proof was submitted; and it was concluded no cheating/rule breaking took place... Or did I miss something on this thread?

I just bought a 790FX board so I can have the same setup that a team member has been using... Why? Because I want to do an internal challenge with said team mate to see which of the chips yields the best results... So does that mean that because we'll both have same board, cpu, ram; only one of us gets to submit 2D benches? Yes; he's young enough to be my son, or maybe I'm old enough to be his dad... But still. This whole thing about "we just want to spare October the hassle of being called a cheat" is just preposterous. I say; let people call her a cheat; and then watch them get shut down once dejo and October PROVE them wrong. It is not HWBot's job to protect October's feelings... Let dejo do that since he is the father. Quite amusing this thread, and this whole issue for that matter... So it goes like this: "We recognize you haven't broken any rules, but we just don't want your daughter to have her feelings hurt if/when she gets called out on a score so we're asking her to refrain from submitting for points"... That's inane to say the least.

Did you try going to the "More" tab on your submission and clicking on the little calculator icon above the Verification Url box? That forces the recalculation of scores AFAIK.

Thanks Massman... I'll re try the submission tonight when I get home from work and will let you know here. EDIT Just checked and the cores drop down is now available when submitting.

I went to submit a wPrime32 run about an hour ago and there is no drop down for me to enter the number of cores on my cpu (555BE unlocked to 4). I submitted the score, but then deleted it. I figured it would be best to take it down until clarification is found on this. As it is right now; there is no way to indicate the number of cores on the submission page.

Mods... Please delete. This was an incorrect submission. It was a wPrime32; not wPrime1024... I wish I could do wPrime1024 in 22 secs... LOL