[The official February Team Cup Warm-up Contest thread.]

Congrats to all teams and members participating in this cup !!!

 

Many congrats to the winning team.

Very good results in the first three stages.

[Stelaras - 2x Pentium 2 Celeron 533Mhz s370 @ 801.5MHz - 117sec 437ms wPrime - 32m]

Very good effort and very good result !!!

 

 

[The official February Team Cup Warm-up Contest thread.]

There was special cpu-z for socket 370. Try it.

 

It doesnt work.

[CPU-Z for S370 setups]

Any chance of making something similar for VIA chipset ???

 

http://valid.canardpc.com/2nv9ep

 

 

This cpuz version for socket 370 (815 chipset) isnt working on VIA.

[The official February Team Cup Warm-up Contest thread.]

For stage-1

http://hwbot.org/competition/feb_teamcup_warmup/stage/1240_cloud_gate_gt_610/

 

Can we also use the regular version of GT-520 ?

 

Which is the exact same product to GT-610 (simply renamed).

Exact same core (GF119) , exact same specs (Shaders / TMUs / ROPs = 48 / 8 / 4).

 

http://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/285/geforce-gt-520.html

[The official February Team Cup Warm-up Contest thread.]

We posted the same time.

 

Thank you.

[The official February Team Cup Warm-up Contest thread.]

There was special cpu-z for socket 370. Try it.

 

link please.

 

*edit*

Are you talking about this one ?

http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=53897

[The official February Team Cup Warm-up Contest thread.]

I guess , i cant participate with a board (Asus CUV4X) that cpu-z CANT read the memory speed ?

 

http://valid.canardpc.com/2nv9ep

[The official February Team Cup Warm-up Contest thread.]

Only use SIS, XGI, Matrox, PowerVR, S3, 3DLabs, 3DFX videocards.

 

Are the on-board (chipset) graphics allowed ???

 

Are they considered to be videocards ???

[The official Rookie Rumble Cup #1 thread.]

Nice moooove ... this rookie cup !!!

 

I like it.

 

:celebration:

[Deleted submission]

It's not the only case , that moderating ... looks the other way.

 

http://hwbot.org/submission/2484028_amateurs_cinebench_r15_core_i7_4770k_1209_cb

 

I dont like to report such scores ... just for typical reasons.

 

 

//

 

Anyway i made my point here.

 

At the end moderators here decide what's proper each time.

 

Case closed.

[Deleted submission]

Imagine how fair would that be ... that purely typical consistency of rules enforcement ... in today's UCBENCH world record.

 

Just because they partially covered in their screenshot the result tab and the command line tab.

 

A great score ... not exactly by the book ... blocked ???

[Deleted submission]

My opinion is that this submission doesnt deserve to be blocked , just because the wrong tab of gpuz got infront when the screenshot was captured.

 

The score is not out of line

There is proof of beeing a gtx-670 all over the place.

The score is not even awarded with points.

 

Dont give that user , the feeling of a wasted effort , just for a minor , pointless flaw.

 

Please reconsider.

[Deleted submission]

? http://img.hwbot.org/u43697/image_id_1052957.jpeg

 

Yes , that's the one.

With the wrong tab of gpuz.

[Deleted submission]

I thought that this matter was sorted out.

 

I dont recall , that the gpu screenshot was missing.

Can you please upload the screenshot.

[Deleted submission]

Who deleted this submission ?

 

http://hwbot.org/submission/2448835_

[Water chiller search]

You got pm.

[Mikecdm - Sempron 150 @ 6162MHz - 1584.86 pps HWBOT Prime]

There must be something wrong with Sargas core and this bench.

 

It doesnt look normal , they cant be scoring so low.

 

[Hynix CFR voltage ?]

ok

 

I think ,i'll give it a try for just under 2.00 volt next weekend and see how it goes.

 

Thanks

[Hynix CFR voltage ?]

I was at 1.9volt (bios) for this validation and there was enough improvement from previous @1.85volt.

 

I am tempted for more ... but i dont want to risk and lose these sticks , both do almost identical speed.

 

That's why i ask.

[Hynix CFR voltage ?]

How much voltage is considered to be safe for aircooled CFR ?

 

Just for max validation ... not benching.

 

I want to see if this mem module have any more speed left (or my IMC perhaps).

http://hwbot.org/submission/2480558_tasos_memory_clock_ddr3_sdram_1727.8_mhz

[Lots of benchmarking toys (ASUS REX, CPUs, LN2 Dewar, Pots, RAM, modded video cards)]

You've got a pm.

[Swedish E8400 @ "743" fsb and more]

Another odd thing is , that he always have perfectly rounded numbers on fsb.

 

?

[Bug in Team achievements icon]

In team achievement section.

 

The one for 2500 golden cups , should be a level 6 (instead of level 3)and it has a wrong icon also.

[The official HWBOT Country Cup 2013 thread.]

How about this http://www.ocaholic.ch/modules/news/article.php?storyid=8272

 

That's just a news post from a tech site and nothing more.

 

 

The date we use to determine "retail" is always the NDA date. Other dates, like retail availability or announcements, sometimes differ from region to region.

 

That procedure , doesnt make sense at all.

Perhaps you should reconsider things a bit more.

 

There's even different NDA types (non-disclosure agreement) and dates for different persons.

Even more , there where NDA's and announcements in the past and no official release of a product (AMD cpu's for example).

 

You are blocking results for typical reasons and minor details ... and on the other hand you are permitting results done with a non existant board or a board that only friends and family of the company actually had , at that date.

 

Anyway that's my opinion.

 

At the end it's your call.

Your game , your rules.