-
Posts
2021 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by ObscureParadox
-
-
the very very best do 5.6-5.8 on air, this seems super improbable
-
3 hours ago, Wasmachineman_NL said:
The link you provided says literally the same thing as we did
-
Fairly certain the 2-3-2-6 sticks were CH-5 from memory but I could be wrong on that. So not far off.
-
I have tonnes of TCCD that I have been testing recently to sell, will send you a list either tonight or tomorrow evening depending on when I have access to my PC.
-
That particular SS gets down to around the -55c mark
-
1 hour ago, Leeghoofd said:
K due to delay we will go for December
Gives me more time to set up
Appreciate this Alby, anything to not spend more time with the family and racist grandparents over christmas is a bonus for me.
-
3
-
1
-
-
58 minutes ago, TaPaKaH said:
True. The difference in 32M on 939 is around 3-4 seconds but 256MB sticks usually clock 5-10MHz better. So in the end I'm not even sure which option will be fastest.
What is more interesting, is that cross-sided and single-sided 256MB sticks have the same performance. Maybe it's just me, but for the last 15 years I was living under a notion that cross-sided is always faster
I suppose it doesn't really make a difference if the number of IC's is the same, you have the same theoretical data throughput with number of chips and clocks etc.Maybe there is a slight difference in latency but I'm not so sure.
-
13 minutes ago, cbjaust said:
A Brexit OS would be super slow surely.
Initial loops would be really quick but then the final few would never end.
-
2
-
4
-
-
Brexit OS anyone?
-
1
-
-
giving the rest of us at least some chance would be nice
-
D9WFN or M perhaps?
-
oh really? Seems a bit odd for micron to use a competitors IC instead of their own.
-
1 hour ago, mickulty said:
Wow, good spot - the spd tab reports it as micron!
EDIT: As does the comment on the score, I'm blind lol
As does the fact he's put a picture of the Ballistix in the submission
-
1
-
-
Only thing I can imagine is that there might have been a dodgy voltage going through the PCI-E lane on that card which fed back to the CPU and killed the board etc. Seems really strange and quite unlucky though
-
1 hour ago, Splave said:
I killed 1 MOCF and 1 PG9 mobo and 1 9900K with these cards so im out
have fun guys.
How in the fuck did you manage that?
-
1
-
-
Just curious with the ram speed and timings etc, was 1:2 ratio not possible with that FSB?
-
6 minutes ago, Noxinite said:
Yup, PSC.
Hopefully got a few litres left to try some more today.
Just slow down a little and give us old timers a chance
-
Unreal efficiency sir, great score! :)
-
1
-
-
Which cooler are you using then? 90+ without any overclocking is pretty high, somethings not quite right here. Can you maybe take a picture of your rig for us?
-
he means the score needs to be shown as "valid" on the 3dmark site, i.e. we need to follow their rules also, so no tesselation modification.
-
To be fair, when the new OpenCL came out for GPU-Pi, we didn't remove all old scores back then or create a seperate ranking, we just accepted that it was part of the benchmark and got on with it.
I also don't know how you'll go about moderating the XTU scores if you have two seperate rankings considering it's the most popular benchmark by far. Unless the submission system can detect which version has been used and therefor always put you in the right catagory by default, I see XTU being completely unmanigable thereafter. -
it's not an important piece of information for a memory benchmark result so I wouldn't worry about it too much
-
15 hours ago, poparamiro said:
The problem is only in gt2 and gt3, about 100 fps less in single card.
That explains so much...... I thought I was going crazy
-
1
-
-
Time to get some LN2 on this bad boy and truly max it out I think :D
TheMadDutchDude - Core i5 7300U @ 3480MHz - 623 marks XTU
in Result Discussions
Posted