ObscureParadox_3XS

Happy Birthday bro!!

Cheers for checking Christian

When 90% of your bedroom floor space is dedicated to hardware

I think I'm getting a firmer grasp of what a bugged result is and isn't now so I'll go through all my results now and delete those I believe are bugged. I won't be bothering to bench the benchmark anymore though until we get a definite answer and what will be happening to the benchmark. Edit, these are the ones I've deleted so far, the rest look ok to me : http://hwbot.org/submission/2433312_obscureparadox_ucbench_2011_a10_4600m_331.4_mpt_score http://hwbot.org/submission/2499465_obscureparadox_ucbench_2011_pentium_4_2.8_ghz_b_northw._(133_fsb)_87.7_mpt_score

Everything wrong here dude Wrong Cinebench, benchmark score and wrong CPU submission, only need to submit as 1 CPU.

Haha, I like that idea, OC contest at bullys!!!!!!!!!!

You're probably better off going for an AM2+ board for Sempron overclocking, the only boards that I know that would even start to compete with a good 790FX/790X board is the crosshair IV and V series but you're unlikely to max a chip with one of those Not trying to go completely off topic just advise

I thought as much just wanted to make sure

what is the temp of the single stage?

That's a fairly sizable space you got for benching there bully!!!!

TCCD or BH-5 used for this one? Either way very nice ram timings

Nope, Realbench can only be run on win 7 and below. Windows 8 ha that timing issue which will give you a bugged result.

Looking forward to this, will be interesting to see how far ahead of everyone else knut is on the AMD side.

holy hell

Oh I know, like I said, glad someone found it and helped get rid of it because I'm not always 100% sure what is bugged and what isn't.

Well I recently just realized that I had a result reported by Mr Scott which was subsequently blocked by Christian Ney. Only just seen that now but I'm glad that is at least 1 more result that is off the system. Personally I think it is time to stop all submission being uploaded to the bot if there is going to be a new wrapper/version put in place soon which will stop all these bugged results from happening. Evening running stock settings on some chips can bring about bugged runs so how is any noob/extreme/pro bencher ever meant to submit valid results 100% of the time if they don't know what would bring about a bugged run and/or simply don't know what one looks like sometimes. I have to admit I don't always look at a result and know whether it is bugged or not because it is simply to confusing

Here comes the new Vantage,11 and FS record all after each other now Grats on the score dude, really looking forward to getting my hands on a 5960X myself.

Good stuff mate, missed this one with the sea of recent results. Anymore to come from the chip?

Much better, good stuff

Consider sold Send me your payment deets and I'll get it sorted for you

awesome CPU bro, batch number on this one?

G.SKill have a 3000MHz kit rated for 15-15-15-35 that's the highest rated one out of the box so far I've seen.

For a start, you're comparing a 3D test to a very quick multi-threaded 2D test, completely different kettle of fish, I have absolutely no problems believing this submission is legit due to the nature of the benchmark.

I disagree, if they sort out boobs for future MOAs then i'll be binning 50+ CPUs just for the competition

This makes me want to try and qualify for the next MOA