Devroush

all done.

@videostar do you still have the save file that you tried to submit? If you can send it to me, I'll take a look.

Thanks for letting us know, it seems there is something wrong with the checksum validation. I've set your score to valid and I've created a ticket to further check on it. https://github.com/COLARDYNIT/hwbot-issues/issues/51

I can confirm it was a bug ?. Fixed!

You're using an older version that did not properly support java 8+. Could you try again with the latest version? https://hwbot.org/newsflash/5114_hwbot_prime_1.0.1_released

Hi sumonpathak, thanks for the report! Registration probably failed because the email contained a trailing whitespace character. I'll make some changes so that those get removed in the future. OC India is not showing up in the list of teams because it has been marked as inactive. Your friend should still be able to join the team by going to the team page (https://hwbot.org/team/oc_india/) and clicking "switch teams"'.

Massman indeed added the check that only moderators can select the manufacturer. I'm also not sure what the reasoning was. I've changed it again so that users can select the motherboard manufacturer. It's not required, if you leave it blank, search will look through all motherboard models. If you add the manufacturer, auto-suggest will only show models of that manufacturer.

Did some nickname changes twllmscttnacomcast.net -> twllmscttna pinedo.jonathan -> xelectrowolfx NoobFTW -> yansenharyanto Method -> Maggehagge corbylambert -> corbyj gijs.vermarien -> Gies Convicted1 -> ZMBKLN Lucas Peperaio -> ExPl00iT

The problem was that you were following a user that no longer existed, I changed it in the database. Can you confirm that your wall loads properly now?

Actually, the problem wasn't the length, but single quotation marks. But yea, fixed now . Done.

Should be fixed now!

Hm stange, we'll look into it.

I've added the reference model to HWBOT, if you want a vendor-specific model added, just ask in this topic. (@Turrican: I didn't add the number of pipelines yet because I haven't got a clue what it is =))

Seems to me there's nothing wrong with the screenshots, but Jaan's submission is some sort of mix of his own submission and sobih's . Score, cpu speed, comment and verification seem to be copied from sobih.

Yup, kinda. But I've already fixed the code, it'll be fixed next time we deploy a new version.

Aha I know what's going on. Some of you pro oc people aren't ranked in the league yet because you haven't submitted anything for the pro oc cup. Small bug, should be fixed relatively soon. (or just start submitting results )

I laughed. Will take a look at it tomorrow edit: seems you aren't ranked in the Pro OC league Ney, I think you are the missing number.

Not sure how it happened but this result was disabled for points: http://hwbot.org/submission/2295959_i.m.o.g._superpi___32m_phenom_ii_x4_955_be_10min_42sec_438ms I've enabled it again, your points should add up again tomorrow, when the league rankings update (and it'll be 15 points higher because that result also has 15 UHP )

Just checked, team achievements are checked each night, it should be updated in about 5 hours.

The error was because of a non-existing team that was awarded the achievement. It's fixed now. Keep in mind achievements aren't awarded immediately, not sure what the schedule is for recalculating them but it shouldn't be too long.

In the meantime, have a "congrats" from me for ranking first .

All 4 winners: week 1: kryptonian_sher (http://hwbot.org/submission/2352268) week 2: Johni5 (http://hwbot.org/submission/2354628) week 3: 1BadMoJoe (http://hwbot.org/submission/2357111) week 4: EuroBuck (http://hwbot.org/submission/2360441)

That was probably a bug then, oldest scores definitely rank first at the moment. xxbassplayerxx's example: http://www.hwbot.org/benchmark/wprime_-_32m/rankings?hardwareTypeId=processor_1741#start=0#interval=20

Hey Genieben, I wanted to try out the wrapper on my new laptop but I got an error during install: It's weird because I checked the path and the file is really there . I'm running Windows 8.

We've been working on a new scoring algorithm, main reason is that if you've got some obscure hardware (like 60-core cpu or something), you can easily get 60 UGP because there's no competition. This is likely to change in the near future so that there's no longer a minimum of 60UGP given out for first place. As for your question: it's a valid point and I don't think it would be hard to implement. I'll probably test it out and see if there are... unforseen consequences .