Remarc

in general It's strange why didn't try all this changes on the test server first. no 4:3 support resolution,fonts of incomprehensible size-on one page one thing, on another another, I have the impression that I opened the site page in 800:600 resolution, the windows-sections are large, but the font is small for that size,if i will reduce 70-80% zoom than this fonts becomes unreadable small it is harmful to the eyes,for me previous version was more comfortable to read etc

+ 486 the last competition with it was 2015

reinstall win7 was fix that issue,as i understand, this could be related to another bug, when after loading desktop I needed to wait 1.5-2 minutes so that any diagnostic programs and some benchs can start-initialization and work (cpu-z,aida,zentimings hwinfo etc)

for cb24 required avx2

exactly,hwbot not recognized all 5x1,had to use other cpus,it always there are some problems at competitions

hp mobo z2 g4 not in database

привет,у тебя в этом резалте частота выше https://hwbot.org/submission/4874568 можешь валидацию переделать на такой же частоте?

i have this problem too,it was almost a year ago and now appeared again

@Kashtan thanks) @unityofsaints exactly) @flanker 1,44v ,added photo

@flankeryes,i always use air,got very good cpu ) @Redwoodz thanks)

@Hitman2207 1,43v

pro version and with benchmate no need link

this is isolation,but thanks)

gtx680 and gtx770

cb20 with benchmate get error Invalid data file: Unable to parse the datafile v.10.0.5 not correct save result file on win7

to M1RROR this bench is one big bug and very strange why has not it been removed yet

add pls gigabyte ga-ep43-ds3lr http://valid.x86.fr/mb2tmh

5630mhz! apparently beginning to emerge more successful cpu samples)

"Cinebench - R20 with BenchMate" "Geekbench4 - Multi Core with BenchMate" what is that?

why is it needed?

7nm but freq the same to 12nm,i expected 6000mhz in cb,it is strange...but still Ryzen power)

allowing use win8-win10

win8-win10 must be allowed...Ryzen power)

1st place,grats)

• In case of doubt videoproof must be provided to the moderators it is very interesting what criteria will determine the doubtfulness of the results