chispy

Please mods verify and check this score http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=846930, compare that score with mine run at much much higher clocks on LN2 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=837110 , i suspect a 3DMark03 Bug done in purpose to give a higher score NOT online with everyone else score , something its not right. On his run he used dual channel , i did tried with dual channel and the scores were lower than the ones i posted for ranking , hence why i did run tri-channel and that was my best score even testing dual and tri-channel. That score cannot be done and not possible on those low clocks. Please identify the problem , bug or cheat.As we all know 03 its all GPU , i was running 900 core on LN2 . Thank you Mods. chispy.

+1 , well said bro i second that :celebration:

:celebration: Thanks bro , we will exchange settings for the 790i Boards and GTX 285 SLI as we have the same weapons . Im going to a big bench Party in New York in a few weeks.

Thats a lot of toys to play with , good luck Benji and have fun. chispy.

Its all fine here in Puerto Rico .

Thank you mods.

OMG another one using Phisycs X cheat , no cpu-z screenshoot neither or valid futuremark link , mods please verify this score against mine on LN2. cheated benchie score run with a c2d 8400 and GTX 285 on H2O - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=841370 My normal benchie score run with i7 965 and GTX 285 on LN2 - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=837121

, its not online anymore for me too.

XS its back up and running 100% with no data loss , finally its back online Thanks fugger.:ws: Enjoy it - http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/index.php

Please mods check this result against mine , another one using Phisycs X cheat , people need to learn how to follow rules , they still doing it My result on SLI GTX 285 in H2O volt moded cards with good clocks and i7 on SS - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=834279 This guy its on stock cooling air GTX 285 low clocks and i7 on H2O low clocks http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=840713 Thank you in advanced mods. chispy.

Phisycs X cheat used on this submission , please check this score done on a c2d dual core and GTX 285 on air. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=838527 Compared that with mine on LN2 GTX 285 @ 900/1405Mhz and i7 965 on LN2, thank you mods. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=837121

Its going to take a while guys , sit back have a drink and bench

Everybody its over at eva2000 (George) website http://i4memory.com/forums.php

Im having the first symptoms of XS Withdrawal I am checking myself in the Mental Health Clinic XS Rehab Program to help me go trhu this tuff times , i will advise you guys do the same in case of heavy withdrawal symptoms , The next session starts at 3:00PM eastern time By chispy at 2009-03-31

Thank you jmke im stuck at 1.26v and 900/1405Mhz on LN2 at -140c with napalmn and Cryptic volt mod form xs forum, i needed that to get me over 1000 core. Again thank you and Crotale :celebration:. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=837121 By chispy at 2009-03-30

As long as there are rules for submissions of PCMark05 and limits theres no need to canned the benchmark , in my opinion. chispy.

220 start up its the max as per hwbot rules , not futuremark guys , just to be clear on this subject . chispy.

Great to hear they raise it to 300mb , thanks for the info SF3D,so it is confirmed. I think thats good for the new hardware point of view , now that we know the cap limit lets have some benching fun again . Happy benching to everyone. chispy.

I would like to know if hwbot its even considering replacing PCMark05 with the more reliable and newer PCMark Vantage ? It would be a viable solution in my opinion and a good option to have another bench to play with. chispy.

I totally agree with you jabski , Now that i have seen and been thru that myself (go past 220 start up with my 8 SSds set up and a Adaptec 5805) , it was fun finding that sweet spot below 220 , for my it was 165 xp start up wich brought me a score over 23k). The problem its FM have NOT set the new cap in placed and the hwbot rules NEED to be rewritten as to what are the bounderies on HD xp start up , HD general usage and HD virus scan. It would be very nice to add PCMark Vantage and award points for it , far more reliable than PCMark05 and it was meant for new technology in mind. I hope for a good decision of hwbot on this matter. Good day guys. chispy.

Sad to hear that bro , i feel your pain and frustration. Dont give up and keep benching , i like a little competition on the GTX 285s category , and im sorry for taking all your trophies on that category . I think the rules of PCMark05 should be more clear as to what are the bounderies of HD xp start up , HD general usage and HD virus scan in order for things like this not happenning no more. The HWBOT Rules need to be rewritten for this benchmark as they are very unclear as of now and very confusing I wish you the best RAMDAC and thank you for stand up and bring this to other members attention. Good Luck. chispy.

This tread will be used to raise our opinions as benchers on this community regarding PCMark05 HB Rules , FM Rules and the correct submision for ranking on PCMark05. Please disscuss the subject in here. 1. Can hwbot confirm exactly what FM have done as far as the 220 cap xp start up HD test , is it 220 ,300 ,400 ? 2. It would be nice to see in the screenshoot a pic of device manager with the alleged HD used (Acard raid0 , SSds Raid0 , i-Rams etc...). Thank you. chispy.

Thank you to the mods who have taken the time to answer my questions and PM , it would be nice if the real FM cap its announced for others to know and what are the limits of HD test in PCMark05 , as it is not fair seen the top 10 scores work hard to not go over the 220 start up to get a FM links. I know i myself try not to get close to 200 just to be on the safe side and have FM link for submission. Again thank you for the help mods. chispy.

Thank you Maxi :celebration: , thats what i want it to know exactly , you have answered my question fully , now i understand the cap for xp start up HD test in FM has been raised to 300 instead of the old 220. Im at ease now because i did not know that and just now im aware of the changes. Lets keep on benching . Good Day. chispy.

I wont discuss your opinion as thats yours. I have contacted mods via PM already before i posted in here with no answer from them , hence why i posted asking about it in here to gain the attention of the Mods and suceeded . Yes this is a Forum but i dont like the way you used yor CAPS when refering to me thats is very unpolite of you UNDERSTOOD !!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Your talking about me being aggresive right , If you dont understand my way of trying to get things done go cry on a corner , once you stop crying come back and post on this tread . Is it this problem related to a member of your team ? I knew it , hence why you are trying to get the attention of the topic in here wich is the 220 cap xp start up HD test. @SF3D Thanks for your help ,I apprecciate the input and answer from you , sorry if I sounded a little bit harsh but its frustrating seen things like this. Have a good day you guys