dinos22
-
Posts
2501 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by dinos22
-
-
i dont have any coolers with 4mm rods so this works just as well for me
-
Assassin2 is linking to this page, bizarre
http://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/g1.assassin_2
what is that server board doing on there? you think someone will buy that to OC eek?
-
nice guys
shame about the CPU frequencies, these new chips are a bit of a let down for extreme OC crowd.
Are infliction rods a bit wider to be put through the back? KP rods are definitely narrow enough
-
i bet the "no benching in office" rule will go out the window soon
looks fantastic guys!
LOL Kenny hilarious!
-
awesome job mate keep at it
-
in terms of score ratio comment you really need to be testing exactly the same settings to see if it is just the extra frequencies on various parameters that contributed to strangeness
-
NB doesnt clock well on BD compared to older CPUs with a little messing around i did in london
-
-
also 1100T or 1090T will beat BD scores imo
http://hwbot.org/submission/2180076_dinos22_3dmark11___performance_4x_geforce_gtx_580_15233_marks
look at this run with lower GPU speed and CPU frequency
look at GT1 1090T eek
-
the problem areas are still there the way it looks to me
GT1 & PT/CT scores
don't forget we didnt run NB higher than 2000 or so too and memory was left at auto
-
donno man i guess she doesn't like you any more
-
just skip to 6Ghz and start testing "scaling" hehe
-
LOL at the clock wall remark
what about a performance wall
-
did Assange hook you up with a secure encryption lol
-
just let it sit in the drawer for 2 weeks and it will be perfect again mate
-
-
-
Tiborr was that with two cores only for CPUz or multicore benching?
so first cpu died coz of llc-10?nar we used the same LLC (extreme present or something like that) with first chip for the 3 days and it had no issues. The chip was probably on its last legs before we got it imo
-
i uploaded a couple of scores with 4 cards...... we just used 2GHz NB, Auto ram timings etc so from that aspect it could have been a bit better but efficiency was still off. I also have a 4way score with 4.2GHz 1090T on the database in which GT1 for example was way ahead and i bet CPU scores would be stronger too if i tried it at 5.5
-
-
LAWL hahah
-
sick CPU daaaaamn
-
btw guys, we identified a problem with LLC, btw this is version 1.1 board with LLC implemented. On the highest level of LLC it starts to affect stability past 5Ghz. When I dropped to one level down i was able to bench at 7Ghz 3DMARK11 (we figured it out 5 minutes before the end of 3 days benching OF COURSE LMAO). Anyways dont use the highest LLC setting when benching...
-
Thanks all, i had screenshots on one of the HDDs and guess what i copied the wrong backup drive's backup folder LOL. I emailed the guys at UK office to extract the files for me but essentially we could bench up to 7Ghz 3DMARK11 which is really nice. I wasnt expecting that. Talking about not expecting something, macci mentioned on livestream he didnt expect us to hit 8GHz. Something tells me we might be pushing way past 8.2 once we actually test more than 1 CPU LMAO
Very Intelligent weekend in Sweden
in Sandy Bridge-E / Ivy Bridge (X79) OC
Posted
my point is there is no point spending more money if everything i already have also works