liq_met

Set here 6800 series the unlocked https://hwbot.org/submission/2365144 https://hwbot.org/submission/3971321 https://hwbot.org/submission/2365144 https://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?userId=50664&gpuId=1460 .Thx. Why is it missing editing https://hwbot.org/submission/3869098? Why is it missing common Memory Read ranking https://hwbot.org/submission/4440038 ? Here are Celeron D 320 https://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?userId=49276&cpuId=925

I thought my thread of corrections was for this, but not. Because these mobos new. Is it hard to fix them? pfff Report, sometimes you can wait for an answer for an eternity and ss in front of your face. Tasos dont` worry . It`s emptiness.

https://hwbot.org/submission/3696807 has M4N68T-M-V2 https://hwbot.org/submission/3247334 also

I done request for https://hwbot.org/submission/3503809 and nothing.

This sub applies to category 6800 GT or simple 6800 but unlocked? https://hwbot.org/submission/3971321

Like seem i watched here: https://hwbot.org/submission/794886

I`m read untrue, as such as GA-60XE!!! Notify it name inside link.

http://valid.x86.fr/bj723g GA-60X0

http://valid.x86.fr/r26gf7 CHAINTECH CT-6AJM4 / 100 Socket370 < VIA694X

Also to separate Athlon 64 3800+ (Orleans) on 45W `n` 59W.

Liq-met Try sl6wf - good attempt for many clocks

missing version of c.-z.

Too much for 128Gb

Why no progress at Achievements? Eternal 37 for "Use a Gigabyte mainboard" . I already added a mobo from GA. Collect 250 cups and medals.Score goes incorrectly, total 159. Counts in Exel: 79 33 25 25 162

Yes. Useless the benchmark. Hurray. Show possible sets for your memory only. In cpu-z all is. Test in Windows 10 uses another API, compare w/ Windows 7 and fast Windows 8.1 for more details.

Need set FW 71,89 and do screenshot or give link on their specs

WR? It looks stupid and pointless, when i enter from Pentium 4 3.4Ghz >3dmark05 i see a stranger therefore, i'm doing a report for true sub , in return I get a lot request and idiot`s answers. On guess about the dates, which is 5.05.12 for aquamark and cpu i`m also did not receive an answer, e.g.: https://hwbot.org/submission/1022709 w/ another link, but date old! Unfortunately, with the advent of the new mail, I do not have emails from CN and nothing know about the dates! And so here are 4 pages of stupid remarks that are corrected. It`s uncool.

Retry: http://valid.x86.fr/a/e0cchm maybe MT6752 2Ghz?

We have no choice asus or msi, so you have cool state

All thanks to memory, write us her name or do snapshots

http://valid.x86.fr/a/e0cchm maybe MT6752 2Ghz?

Then i`am notice that first screenshot shows CPU as DX4.But second screenshot shows CPU as DX2. This`s all said. IMO IMO ?immunity Please, direct link on true dx4 https://hwbot.org/submission/2991129 , almost 104 mhz. And read a comment https://hwbot.org/submission/2944104 / below: Chkcpu showed wrong speed, Maxspeed is closer.

Before you argue it is necessary to analyze: https://hwbot.org/submission/2224197 multiplier can not be 3.1 and bus 33 or programm counts to 104 inaccurate https://hwbot.org/submission/4047576 multiplier 2,5*33 https://hwbot.org/submission/2958515 multiplier 1,5*50 and further 2*40(40 can be?)

All perfectly works on Firefox 44, go to 7 February

Please, here was link