Massman

Try tweaking the RTL

Ironically, it says "Can I get some tweaks, bro" in your signature

Just saw this thread. Looking into it!

Updated New score: 2015-08-05 - 47.230 - I.nfraR.ed - Athlon XP 2500+ Barton @ 2936.00 MHz - 267 MHz \N - Abit AN7

No updated

Updated

updated

Can you give a screenshot? Would be easier to debug.

That's actually not a bad idea! It would give Team Captains an extra incentive to keep in touch with the entire community, would also increase the importance of the team member, and stops promoting large, inactive teams. :celebration:

Der8auer explained the difference in ideas over messenger. So originally, he was thinking about a competitive Teams League that solely looks at the GTPP and takes the average score of the best 10/20. We can only do something like this alongside the current format. The goal is to make it more appealing to be part of the team again, something which is working well for some teams, but for a lot of teams it's not. Der8auer made this suggestion in the private XOC Focus Group (link for those who have access)) and the response was a bit more positive. Thank you for coming up with ideas on how to improve the League, Der8auer! Moving forward, I think we need to have more exact information on the following items: What is the balance of GTPP and HTPP in the Teams League What is the weight of the single-man heavy-hitters on teams What would a GTPP ranking look like based on the average top 10, allowing one score per architecture or generation That's stuff for next week! This analysis is correct, but not complete. Like you said, it would put smaller teams of which no member does high-end as a disadvantage. It would require larger teams or teams which have a couple of high-end benchers to be more active/competitive in the GTPP space. Thank you for the civil discussion and relevant contributions, Rasparthe.

First things first, let's make sure we're all on the same page. The current Teams League is based on the following algorithm: SUM[GTPP + HTPP + (UP)/10], with GTPP = Global Team Power Points = "best score per team per global ranking"; eg. 3DMark03 1xGPU HTPP = Hardware Team Power Points = "best score per team per hardware ranking"; eg. 3DMark03 1xGPU GeForce GTX 480 UP = Sum of all team member user points, without limit on GL, HW, or WR The suggestion of Der8auer affects the GTPP only. His suggestion is to rank the teams in the global rankings differently. Instead of taking into account just the best score of the team, he suggests to take into account the best 10 scores of the team. The caveat: one hardware can only be used once (so no spamming of 6700K) and one user can account for multiple results (so no hardware sharing). Der8auer asked me to make a couple of examples to show the effect. This calculation is very different from the existing one, so I'm running the numbers manually at the moment. 3DMark11 Performance 1xGPU: Current [table=head;autonum=1]score|team|gpu 35852|Australia OC|GeForce GTX 980 Ti 35011|TecLab OC Team|GeForce GTX 980 Ti 34718|Team MLG|GeForce GTX 980 Ti 34616|Hardwareluxx.de|GeForce GTX 980 Ti 34330|PURE|GeForce GTX 980 Ti 32367|Extreme Box OC TEAM|GeForce GTX 980 Ti 31939|Elite Overclockers of Korea (republic)|GeForce GTX 980 Ti 31578|Team KATANA|GeForce GTX 980 Ti 30464|Asus ROG|GeForce GTX 980 Ti 30280|Madshrimps Belgium OC Team|GeForce GTX 980 Ti 30278|Klan-OC|GeForce GTX 980 Ti 29517|OcTeamDenmark|GeForce GTX Titan X 29257|lab501.ro|GeForce GTX Titan X 29020|OverCleX|GeForce GTX 980 Ti 28809|Team South Africa|GeForce GTX 980 [/table] 3DMark11 Performance 1xGPU: Der8auer method (10 best) [table=head;autonum=1]score|team 24757,9|Team MLG 23964,3|TecLab OC Team 23267|Australia OC 22825|PURE 22548,1|Hardwareluxx.de 22413,6|Extreme Box OC TEAM 21519,9|Klan-OC 21164,3|Overclockers.com 21033,2|Overclock.net 20314,5|HW Legend OC 19889,3|XtremeSystems 19849,2|Team Russia 19571,4|Asus ROG 19500|HwBox Hellas O/C Team 19316,8|ForumOverclocking.ro [/table] 3DMark Performance 1xGPU: Der8auer method (20 best) [table=head;autonum=1]score|team 18952,2|Team MLG 17726,05|Australia OC 17662,7|TecLab OC Team 16867,4|Hardwareluxx.de 16412,25|HW Legend OC 16412,1|Overclockers.com 16378,85|Overclock.net 16373,25|PURE 16300,7|Klan-OC 15885,4|Team Russia 15771,8|HwBox Hellas O/C Team 15529,5|PC Games Hardware 15167,4|XtremeOverdrive OC team Italy 15097,35|XtremeSystems 15056,4|lab501.ro [/table] Comparison hardware used: 5th place Current - Pure: GeForce GTX 980 Ti (Xtreme Addict) Der8auer (10) - Hardwareluxx.de: GeForce GTX 980 Ti (Dancop), GeForce GTX Titan X (Dancop), GeForce GTX 980 (Dancop), Radeon R9 290X (Dancop), GeForce GTX 780 Ti (Dancop), GeForce GTX Titan (Dancop), GeForce GTX 780 (Dancop), Radeon HD 7970 (BenchBros), GeForce GTX Titan Black Edition (paralyzer2005), GeForce GTX 680 (Freakezoit). Der8auer (20) - HW Legend OC: GeForce GTX 980 (rsannino), GeForce GTX 980 Ti (delly), GeForce GTX 780 Ti (rsannino), Radeon R9 290X (NATA 58), GeForce GTX 780 (rsannino), GeForce GTX 970 (delly), Radeon HD 7970 (rsannino), GeForce GTX Titan Black Edition (NATA 58), GeForce GTX Titan (delly), Radeon R9 280X (NATA 58), Radeon R9 280 (delly), Radeon HD 7950 (delly), GeForce GTX 960 (delly), Radeon R9 285 (delly), GeForce GTX 680 (delly), GeForce GTX 580 (rsannino), GeForce GTX 770 (NATA 58), Radeon R9 270X (NATA 58), GeForce GTX 670 (Slime), GeForce GTX 950 (isonzo) First impression By limiting to different hardware, the GTPP will be skewed towards the high-end of the latest generation. Especially in product series where there are multiple revisions of the top performance hardware, this will be an issue. For example: GTX 980, 980 Ti, Titan X. These are three different models, but all from the same product category. This effect should apply to all benchmarks. What could be another interesting approach is to go by unique core architectures (Skylake, Haswell, Ivy Bridge) or product families (GeForce 900, GeForce 700, GeForce 600).

Running the numbers ... Excel is going mad

Congrats everyone!!

Problem seems to have resolved itself. Anyone else still having issues?

WHOAH! Nice!

That's pretty cool! :woot:

I read you tried different OS installs. Maybe the ISO is broken? - can you run gpupi with a different cpu/platform on this OS install? - can you run gpupi with this platform using a different OS (like W10)?

Hm ... so which platforms worked before and are now failing? X79 only? Or Z97 too?

I want to add this in the submission form somewhere. Like we added GPower and stuff

All is fine; it was a strong typhoon, but not as strong as the previous one. Not too much debris in the streets, only a couple of areas without power or water. I think @pepinorang had issues with water

What's the term for a bromance between father and son?

Impressive!

Excellent!

Bug or real?