GtiJason

Thanks fire, this is something I was unaware of. When I think "hardware sharing" I see the meaning you would find in a dictionary, guess I should be having my lawyer look the rules over for me to see where else I'm losing valuable HWBoints

I see, so you can technically share physical hardware as long as you don't submit the same benchmark with it. I hope Der8aur finds a 7g gem and sells it for like $2000 US, that way several teamates and I can each get two or three global 4 core golds. Thanks for the heads up Michael

I see, so you can technically share physical hardware as long as you don't submit the same benchmark with it. I hope Der8aur finds a 7g gem and sells it for like $2000 US, that way several teamates and I can each get two or three global 4 core golds. Thanks for the heads up Michael

Ok to share hardware if different benchmark subbed ?

Ok to share hardware if different benchmark subbed ?

Solid

Uhhh... one hunerd twenty one fiddy, and gimme till the 1st of the month to get my wellfare check ! Haha jk I think this is the screenie of when you took them on the super quick cold run. Don't ask me about waza stability, though I bet 16k was no problemo.

No worries on vcore, he kept NB Freq at 5g to make up for it

I was talking with a teammate about this a few days ago, we couldn't find much about it either and were left wondering. I imagine if each core has a permanent tag or name (core 1) then there most likely is a way to do so, but not so sure they do. Best solution I have found is booting from the bios at say 6.9g if your looking for 2 core and if you make it into windows you have the two best cores, so 50/50 chance the one you raise in TurboV is the best. Unless you feel like booting at 7.1 and knowing if it boots you found it, but I prefer booting at 5g and making changes later in the OS

Thanks for the update

Pic at 2800

You have PM I cracked the seal on these tonight to determine if I should sell on ebay with other binning rejects and shoot for top dollar since unopened, or if I'd be letting decent hardware rot away in a Mincraft rig. Decided on testing max voltage of 2.15v after low volt warm-up. Only spent about 20min on them and passed 32m no waza 2800c9 uber tight at 1.990v (didn't try lower). Same settings ran 32 m at 2866 but bump v to 2.080v. Here is the final test pretty much same timings but increased tRAS from 15 or 16 up to 21. Final vDimm 2.140v with fairly decent results. Keep in mind this is a quad kit and only spent about 20 min. each kit. Serial no.s ending in 25/26 were tested together first, and then tested 27/28 together so they appear to be matched up well.

60C load temps at 4000MHz on dice, was the pot suspended above the cpu?

It's got potential !

All that prep work really paid off, killer run

Solid OC

Good luck, I hope you can get close but I can hear the imc screaming already. Even if you have to lower frequency or raise timings 4 sticks of B Die will be very efficient

That's right, but the other verification links say 24xx Mhz to equal close to 5000mhz. He would need 1209.5*4 to equal the 4838mhz (2419) required for 2nd place globally or for ddr4 mem. freq.

How come the verification url link / checksum is saying 1209mhz? CPU-Z version or IDK

Damn, 6522mhz you killin' it son

I have a decent set of TridentX 2666c10, but its a 2x4gb kit. If you need a good quad kit I have a TridentX 4x4gb kit of 2400c9 new in box with same date as my set that do 2933c9 12-12-25-1 128 at 2.25v Edit, its a 2013 date so not the new rma ones with 2015 date

Hope no PL for the man from PL

Well, that went from bad to worse quickly. I guess using negative voltage offsets in software to raise gpu volts when said software has them reversed is a bad thing. Sorry for your loss, maybe you can make a YouTube (troll) video about how to fix a broken gpu by cooking it on top of your '78 TransAm manifold

THIS ONE ..... STUPID MSI

This thing, see