websmile

http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/4coredual_sata2_r2.0/ search and you will find^^

@Leeghoofd Not all Samsung can do TRCD 12 easily, some fail hard on low voltage - have you ever tried trcd13 to see if this is the problem? My 2666c10 can do at 1,62 and 1,64v at 2x4GB on Ivy (skipped Haswell) but I know lots of high bin kits from different manufacturers fail hard on this @oc_windforce Good test and very nice pics

Hypers sold at german awardfabrik - can be closed and moved, thanks for the space, hwbotforum

Last bump

Team sold in german hwluxx forum

Bump

Screen 2800 c10-12-12-28 Spi32M added for the Team 2400

Hi, as I do not need that much bench-mems anymore the following items are for sale 1. 2x4GB Team Xtreem LV2400 Cas9-11-11-28 (Samsung Ics) Kit is mint condition, original packaging is part of the deal. Good clocker, last test today on Ivy bridge on my repaired Z77 is shown at screens as well as a 2666 reference run. Kit was used as reference kit for reviews, on which I quit, therefore I do not need it anymore sold 2. 3x2GB SuperTalent Chrome 1600 7-7-7-21+ 1x2GB Patriot 1800LL (Elpida Hyper) The Chrome come in original blister packaging, the Patriot stick comes with removed HS which are still here, but new thermal pad is needed^^ - the four sticks did 2000 7-7-7-20 with hard subs between 1,65v and 1,70v on Z77 Ivy Bridge, the STT are like new and in mint condition. I don´t plan to upgrade to haswell or bench older Intel systems, because of that they can go, would be a waste to let these rot at 24/7 rig. Sold Shipping is via deutsche post insured, if tracking works depends on the service the destination country offers. Disclaimer No returns, no warranty provided by me, but all items are tested and in fully working condition, all sold as seen on the pictures

Take a good look at the socket if some pins are bent and if not, try again with boxed cooler to rule out problems of too much pressure on cpu - I had similar problem at M5G, this had bent pins in socket, after this was rpaired, board works flawless now

sold and already paid, thanks for the space can be moved

OK, the bundle is yours then, Christian - I send you my data

Hi, after I finished my retro tests on AMD, my Hardware can go on sale Bundle DFI LP UT NF4 Expert+ AMD AthlonX2 3800(Toledo E6)+&Zalman 7000 AlCu cooler+ 2x512MB Kingston HyperX 3500C2+ 2x256MB Kingston HyperX3500C2 Board works flawless, comes in original box with sli bridge, no other accessories, imho is the best 939 benching board you can get. cpu is one of the best X2 I have ever had, does above 3ghz 32M on air, mems work flawless as well. Shipping only within europe, price will be around 20 euros incl. tracking and insurance via dhl Price 70 euros + shipping sold to Christan Ney Best regards No returns, no warranty, if oc results are mentioned, ymmv

All kits sold, thanks to the buyers and to hwbotforums for the space Can be moved

Excellent work, and good to see at least three of my old PSC sticks are still alive how come there are only 6GB shown?

Sorry, typo, of course number 3 is gone - number 2 is still available, 1+3 are sold, payment pending Edit kit#2 pending

#1 and #3 pending - #2 still available

Bump

Hi, offering here three 2x2GB Kits of GSkill RipjawX PSC, preferred sales region is europe, payment via Paypal. All three kits are in fully working condition, the screens were made today on Z68! Mainboard, so on Z77 or Haswell, these will do better normally at MHz Voltage ratio. All prices are without shipping, I will fiind best shipping option if you ask me. Items are located at germany 1. 2x2GB GSkill RipjawX 2133C9@1,50V(F3-17000CL9D-GBXMD Comes in box with fan, fully functional and like new Price 65 Euros+shipping sold+shipped 2. 2x2GB GSkill RipjawX 2133C9@1,50V(F3-17000CL9D-GBXMD Come in box with fan as well, mint condition Price 65 Euros+shipping sold 3. 2x2GB GSkill RipjawX 1866C8@1,60V(F3-14900CL8D-GBXM Come in the box of some 2200PI with fan, technical and optical flawless Price 30 Euros+shipping sold+shipped On OC-results, all are on air, but ymmv Best regards Michael Disclaimer: no returns, no warranty provided by me, but all kits have intact warranty stickers and heatspreaders have never been removed

There were times memory freq was important for overall overclock, seeing pre grandmother oc times with locked multipliers and fsb/HT having to be overclocked - today imho you simply rate the product itself, quality of craftmansship, price-performance ratio, undervolting potential and overclocking, overall max frequency and other options like warranty, goodies and so on. At reviews I made, I only rated the kits themselves on several criterias, and believe me that there was a wide range of overall ratings in the end. If it makes sense for daily gamer to buy expensive highend stuff like 2933 kits today or GTX2 in the past was always discussed, seeing the gain at FPS you mentioned, better VGA or CPU accelerates more, so I agree with you. But the differences at memory kits itself it is what has to be rated at such reviews, and every other hardware product. The percentage rating is not all that counts but what people see first together with awards, because of this I like clear differences there and not 90% for every product. This is no easy subject to discuss, reviews need experience and knowledge about the stuff you have to judge. I had 100s of mem kits I bought myself, from values up to highend, which I all tested and which gave me my "baseline". If you had for example several 37 Euro Samsung value kits that did 2666 cas10 or 11 and went up to 2800, it is not easy to give 2400 specced 90 euro kit that does the same or less 90%.... Hope I made my point clear, I tend to lose grip on discussions like these , of course every reviewer has his own style to measure things and his own experiences, but imho he has the obligation to show differences that are there, and also show these by making noticeable differences at rating - just my 2 cents

A reviewer does not rate only the percentage of overclock as main criteria, he rates overall performance, stability, price, optic and so on. GTX2 were best of brand, apart from a few lucky draws at other manufacturers, there were no better overall performance Hypers than these. What makes me agree on Pieters rant is that you cannot give an average rating of 90% to all products you review, this leaves no room for seperating the extraordinary from the good, the good from mediocre and the mediocre from the bad and leaves no headroom for extraordinary performing hardware. If mediocre stuff already gets 90%+, where is the room for best of brand mems that give you outstanding performance? You can give different awards if you want to rate special features, budget award for example for lowend good priced mems that give reasonable performance and good bang per buck, or enthusiast award for extremely high priced mems meant to break benchmark records and therefore offering best overall clocks- but rating all kits that you review at 90% and more doesn´t help make decisions for people reading the reviews and it doesn´t help at all to make differences between kits clear

found some old stuff on my hdd 396,391 - websmile - Core i5 2500K @ 5002.50 MHz - 1111,6Mhz 7-9-7-20 - Asus Maximus IV Gene-Z68

good run, my friend - grats

Even at the Gigabyte contest a few years ago 3:5 submissions were not accepted or recalculated to 2:3 because you cannot prove it has been made with 200 strap. If the board and mems can do it, it will work on 1:2 as well, so rebench it because the way it is now, the validation is useless

Good work like usually, my friend - You have so much lucky runs, I think I simply rule out coincidence

excellent result for two dual cards, keep on pushing