Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

websmile

Administrators
  • Posts

    5781
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    59

Everything posted by websmile

  1. Anyway, you can contact Christian_Ney on this or Massman, maybe they finally update the stage rules. I am now off duty for an undetermined time and plan to do a lot of unfinished business that I had no time for.
  2. websmile

    DDR4 GALAX OC LAB

    Please add Nick and date to the picture, thanks - you got pm btw
  3. No, the 1000 series contains only the cards with this name, otherwise I think it would be Pascal
  4. This is OK because you need 3 entries for the complete result and it is average time because faster is better. Still 3 subs will always be ranked higher than one or two only.
  5. I know, but we had 58xx which are practically same a couple of times now, this would make no sense to use it again. 6970 and 6950 are main targets P.S. The division of amd cards is giving headaches all the time^^
  6. This is clearly a configuration error - will make a task to update this, HD 6000 is OK, but I intended the 69 series to be part of this and not the 68
  7. I see no obvious reason why you did not ask - if you buy stuff without knowing before the contest even started it is not hwbot`s business. Not much more to say about it, it is a three months contest and there is no need to hurry. On another note, 1822 at xtu 5g will not be accepted (sigh, XTU still bugging) and do not downclock for screenshot on stuff like this and also disable speedstep so that we can check frequency. 5003 is the core limit in cpuz and 5,00 at xtu, to check this we need full multiplicator on the screenshot.
  8. There is no Haswell-E 10 core cpu...
  9. Restrictions always refer to cpu used, so am2 cpu is mandatory
  10. Configuration problem, now it should work
  11. @Sunset - three days ago someone asked a simple question and it was cleared, by doing this as well you could have avoided not only purchase but also discussion. This is the main point I refer to and you can´t deny this. Same I cannot and will not deny that the description is unclear, nontheless it makes no sense when you see stuff like this and buy items despite the fact you do not know if they can be used. P.S. We had a configuration error at the rules, can someone confirm that the downloads for background are now on again and work?
  12. Skip the detection on gpupi and disable sysinfo on am3 and upload to hwbot and then add to team cup. Best I can advise at the moment P.S. and please clear cache and cookies on your browser, this can sometimes cause this problem as well. I checked your gpupi result and I can upload it without problem
  13. Send the bill to massman or blame yourself for not asking - the stage was designed from the start for ddr1-4 in the original concept and the fact people always search loopholes and don´t ask because they are afraid to lose the loophole advantage is common but also has sometimes the consequence people fail... I asked several times for clarification before the start but well... P.S. which initial post do you mean? This one that states ddr1-4 a couple of days ago? http://forum.hwbot.org/showpost.php?p=490626&postcount=6 As said, ask Pieter, all I can do is make clean concepts, ask for fixes if I see something is not explicit enough, but I cannot run after it 24/7 when I have 1k results at challengers i have to check and other stuff to do
  14. No, we do not accept unreleased hardware (start date) at the competition. On retail mainboards I see no big problem though, we cannot check this anyway when we see the facts.
  15. Moderated, I handled this generously as long as I saw the spirit of the comp ( temperature at clear plus and decent delta) being respected, monitoring is not 100% precise on Ryzen anyway atm. Thanks for the good participation and grats to the winners
  16. ddr1-4, fb dimm is ddr2 and rdram is different technology
  17. We have a stage which is maximum memory clock for ddr1-4, the stage I talk about is misc sc4 stage 1, which states maxmem rb 2011-3
  18. After division results brought final proof of maxxmem being non reliable and not acceptable anymore for competetive benching we do not need another test. We will repace the benchmark on monday. Benching this stage atm no need
  19. Page 1 of this thread and also at news thread about team cup
  20. http://hwbotnews.s3.amazonaws.com/Competitions/1889_GigabyteBeatTheHeat/1920x1080.jpg Official background, will be added to the competition pages monday
  21. OK, here is the link to the wallpaper - we will add it to the contest later http://hwbotnews.s3.amazonaws.com/Competitions/1889_GigabyteBeatTheHeat/1920x1080.jpg
  22. Yes, you can as these are allowed as exception for the team cup
  23. https://d1964r093mwb8w.cloudfront.net/Competitions/1971-1974_TeamCup2017/TeamCup17-banner-1920x1080.png Here it is - don´t pull subs for tactical reasons, we do not want to have a game of unsportmanslike conduct
  24. If we needed a last proof that maxmem is eol and should be made pointless, here we go - not your fault, I did chose it on purpose to see if new bugs turn up apart from the 1000 we know already - and yes, it did turn up
×
×
  • Create New...