Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Seems to me that this new benchmark is quite advanced. And futuremark har probably used alot of time making it.

But I think it shouldnt be added to hwbot before its free. Or atleast you should be able to run it a couple of times to get a score.

 

And 25 minutes. Jeez

Posted

Advanced edition is not that hard to buy if you think how much you can tweak your Vista based PC with it.

It a very little price compared to anything.

I know that many of hardcore hwbotters have bought PRO versions of all previous Futuremar products.

 

PC Mark Vantege should be added to hwbot.

Posted
IMHO PCM Vantage should not be added.

Could you give any reason why? except of humble opinion? :-)

 

Adding Vantage without enabling hwboints is also possible.
The same. The main concept of hwbot is to receive hwboints. Removed old benchmarks must be replaced with something new. Why new PCM could not be a candidate?
Posted
Why new PCM could not be a candidate?

Well just tried to mention not giving boints is always one possibility.

 

Anyways, here are a few reasons why it might actually make sense too now:

 

* no usable free version available

 

* 26 mins or so :o

 

* no way to tell how well the run is going

 

* one might need ioDRIVE to go high in the charts eventually

 

Vantage looks to me like a great benchmark for system builders, hw reviewers and such...but really not too good for competitive benchmarking.

 

btw did some testing with iRAM yesterday and the score wasn't any better than with a single WD RE16 drive. Looking at the scores so far in ORB it seems obvious HDDs play a large role again, but it might be mostly about burst bw this time. So a large array of HDDs in RAID0 looks like the way to go in this bm until that ioDRIVE. ;)

http://www.pcper.com/article.php?aid=224&type=expert&pid=5

Posted

Here's a multicompare link to the iRAM test:

http://service.futuremark.com/orb/multicompare_view.jsp?p0=656&n0=iRAM&p1=277&n1=single+WD+RE16&t=iRAM+test&k=18&s=1&l=1&c=-1370763038

 

The other test was with completely same hw settings, only Vantage installed to the system drive.

 

The runs are definitely not identical, but i'd guess with Vantage the system drive might play a big role in HDD tests even with the bm installed somewhere else. Not much documentation on Vantage out yet so cannot say for sure.

Posted
Anyways, here are a few reasons why it might actually make sense too now:

 

* no usable free version available

 

* 26 mins or so :o

 

* no way to tell how well the run is going

 

* one might need ioDRIVE to go high in the charts eventually

 

I am totaly agree with it.

  • Crew
Posted
Well just tried to mention not giving boints is always one possibility.

 

Anyways, here are a few reasons why it might actually make sense too now:

 

* no usable free version available

 

* 26 mins or so :o

 

* no way to tell how well the run is going

 

* one might need ioDRIVE to go high in the charts eventually

 

fully acknowledged :)

  • 3 weeks later...
Posted
Is there any plans to give PCM Vant any hw points?

 

Not in the near future. If FM changes its policy and makes the PCMark Vantage usable for more than one bench, then there is no real problem.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...