GunGod Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 Guys, I think that it can be fair to remove stage with bugged benchmark or accept as it is.I`m sure in future competitiions MaxxMemm will be updated or removed at all. +1 But in future maybe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex@ro Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 Our time, ln2, money, experience, died hardware and now remove this stage? I am disagree Oh really?And when everyone score 33ns and you score 31 and you know you have no special tweak whats that?Skill? You posted those results even if you knew that was a bug,and thats the way things are,no more no less. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 Temper, temper, no need to argue like this, it's not a matter of skill or special tweaks, it's the equivalent of Car Low, but very rare. Now if this might be considered a lucky run or a bug, it's up to the staff to decide, and being involved in the competition I will no discuss this any further. But there is no need to argue and no need for harsh talk, competitions are won by results, we are screenshot enemies, but friends in the rest of the time, so I don't see no reason for fighting. As far as I am concerned, I think there are 4 options....leave it as it is, block the scores with <33ns, kill this stage or give it less points. 4 options is enough to give the staff a looot to think about Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fuzz3l Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 The germans also have the same model memory. Oh, "we" used Corsair 1866CL7 and Corsair 2000CL7 and some Mushkin... Now can you say me the same model? _ Christian Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 You know you have no special tweak whats that?Skill This was posted earlier: All trick in optimal selection subtimings in CPU-Tweaker, loading windows on BLCK 250+ and lowering of BLCK frequency in windows. It is all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 That gets you a good score (2300+) with 33ns latency, like my 2320 score. That does not give you 32, 31 etc Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hondacity Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 if its reproducible then its not a bug... most of you guys did awesome in maxmem Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1Day Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 if its reproducible then its not a bug... most of you guys did awesome in maxmem Quite right on both counts. Congratulations to all the participants and well done to the winning team. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 if its reproducible then its not a bug... most of you guys did awesome in maxmem If it is it should not be hard to see dozens of screens with that latency. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.