lanbonden Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 Been waiting for your result and this is nothing less then amazing, shame we didnt get to see that 20k+ score Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 (edited) Bad luck, but not better for me either. I have no score. SS seems to not hold at all (losing 1 deg per second on the evap), otherwise I could run at 3.2-3.3 just on phase. Also problems with boards, because several CPUs did not post in AN7 and when I hooked up the chiller in the last hour, windows wouldn't start. Not a bad score though. And you win the competition as well Congrats! Edited March 31, 2016 by I.nfraR.ed Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZFeSS Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 Congrats for the winner! Hope to see 20k from someone, but you scored really high. We make all board mods - VDD, VMem and 3.3V PSU rail, but it didn't give us even 1MHz FSB. Anyway I wasn't expect 2nd place in stage 1 with Ti4200 and watercooling. Tweaks make a great boost in 01. Did you get any boost from omega drivers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stermy57 Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 Omega driver gives zero improvement... win2000 + driver 42.xx or 43.xx with 2900mhz and agp 8x are the best combination. I was the first that submit this bench with win2000... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZFeSS Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 agp 8x Didn't get any additional marks for overclocking agp 4x to 88MHz. I think agp 8x is not necessary. Or you get some positive numbers? Win2k is really a must. Few weeks ago I installed W2K and forget about XP. Used it only to define max clocks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 Congrats Stelio !!! Great score. Too bad about your cpu. I hope you can find an equally good one or even better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stermy57 Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 Didn't get any additional marks for overclocking agp 4x to 88MHz. I think agp 8x is not necessary. Or you get some positive numbers?Win2k is really a must. Few weeks ago I installed W2K and forget about XP. Used it only to define max clocks. I have done 1-2 runs with ti 4200-8x vs ti 4600 and with same driver, same os, same frequency 8x gives a little boost. Your ti 4200 isn't a very ti 4200... 4200-440-4600 are the same chip, you have a 4200 with 4600 pcb so it's a ti 4600 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelaras Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 Thank you all for the kind comments . It helps ease the pain :D:D It was a run made this morning (stopped benching at 4AM) , as i was a bit sad cause i lost my good CPU and didn't want to bench during the previous days. Ivan , i agree . It was a stage with many problems . We lost one ti4600 & one ti4800 ... and one good 3.4Ghz 3D benchable XP-M . Wish i was living near you . I would repair your SS at no cost ... or maybe just one beer ! As for the mods , Vdd didn't help at all . The 3.3v line was at 3.55V and helped raising a few Mhz . Only thing i know about Omega drivers is that they didn't score lower than the original drivers . Not much of a difference ... maybe 50 points . It was more a kind of "going back in time" , when we were using these kind of drivers . Thanks again all of you ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stelaras Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 Omega driver gives zero improvement... win2000 + driver 42.xx or 43.xx with 2900mhz and agp 8x are the best combination. I was the first that submit this bench with win2000... You are right ! Win2k is more efficient for 3dmark2001 with these platforms . I knew it before this competition started ! Didn't get any additional marks for overclocking agp 4x to 88MHz. I think agp 8x is not necessary. Or you get some positive numbers?Win2k is really a must. Few weeks ago I installed W2K and forget about XP. Used it only to define max clocks. Agp 8x scored a bit higher . 100-200 points max from what i remember. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lanbonden Posted March 31, 2016 Author Share Posted March 31, 2016 Didn't get any additional marks for overclocking agp 4x to 88MHz. I think agp 8x is not necessary. Or you get some positive numbers?Win2k is really a must. Few weeks ago I installed W2K and forget about XP. Used it only to define max clocks. I gained like ~200 points when going from 66 to 95MHz agp and it allowed slightly higher mem frequency for some reason. This part about win2k however had I totaly missed, guess I have to try it out sometime Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZFeSS Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 Your ti 4200 isn't a very ti 4200... 4200-440-4600 are the same chip, you have a 4200 with 4600 pcb so it's a ti 4600 It's more than regular Ti4400, but less than Ti4600. Ti4600 clocks a little bit better in general, and has 2.8ns mems. It's really hard to make 750+ on 3.3ns, with 2.8 you can push mems to 800. My second (3.3ns) card fails at 700 for example. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted March 31, 2016 Share Posted March 31, 2016 I had all needed weapons: Windows 2000, AGP freq at 99MHz, Ti 4600 that does 440/820 on LN2 (I think mem freq would help more than AGP 8x on other cards), an XP-M able to bench Pi 32M at 3.5GHz, a board that does at least 260MHz stable FSB. And I didn't even make a single score... It is my fault, because due to lack of time I postponed this until the very end and it always happens like this. The SS was refilled 2 times already without any luck. It was dropping temps very slowly. I left it idle with system turned off and the evap temp dropped to -55. As soon as I start the system temperature keeps rising, CPU temp too. So I don't know...it's either clogged or lost gas again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.