Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Just made 4 submissions for GPUPi (via Benchmate Datafile) and non of them appeared in my submissions.

Is it broken atm ?

  • Author

GPUPi for CPU. I've made 4 subbmissions of GPUPi for CPU (v.3.2 100M and 1B and v3.3 100M and 1B), non of them appeared in my submissions.

  • Author

Is says uploaded successfully for all 4 results but non of them are in my submissions and in rankings:

image.thumb.png.4a240473424c6eea5d121a05060294de.png

  • Crew

Had the same issue yesterday. Result didnt appeared in the ranking and keeps telling "its not the best submission". Very confusing for users. Should it detect when its not yet ranked, instead of saying its not the best one?

 Apparently the bot needs extreme time to sync for GPUPI 3.2 CPU 1B CPU subs. All other GPUPI stuff werent a problem.

Also ranking is way off, recalculating didnt helped immediately, might be also a factor for the syncing  prob.

image.thumb.png.d40a4dce82e30c440c98141f5edc8830.png

  • Crew

Programmer is onto a memory leak that he think is the root of this trouble. It slows down the Bot tremendously in under a week and creates these dreaded 50X errors and not Best submission bug

  • Crew
9 hours ago, Leeghoofd said:

Programmer is onto a memory leak that he think is the root of this trouble. It slows down the Bot tremendously in under a week and creates these dreaded 50X errors and not Best submission bug

Fantastic news if the guy could fix this! 

I was trying out GPUPI 3.2 & 3.3.3 (64bit) with my GTX-760. I submitted to the 3.2 (1min 02.xxx) and everthing is okay :-). I first submitted for 3.3.3 from within the program and the results where posted/submitted to GPUPI 3.2. I ran 54.xxx sec in 3.3.3 not in 3.2.. Is there something wrong with the submission button in GPUPI 3.3.3??

I had no problem resubmitting the run - Manually - with the submit score option from main screen. It only makes me MAD as I have called others on this error.. -> Submitting GPUPI 3.3.3 for GPUPI 3.2 as the newer one always gives lower times..

Thank You For Your Time?

  • Crew

we pulled the GPUPIs apart, however the coder didn't give other Hex keys to the datafile so 3.3s are always submitted in the wrong category. 

This has been added to the rules to submit manually if you want to submit a 3.3  score.

GPUPI4.0 is around the corner and will get proper implementation to the HWBOT api

GPUPI 3.3 was never meant to be in its own category. It doesn't know about the change in category. That was decided afterwards from the bot. I remember the time well, I nearly turned my back on HWBOT and needed to take a few months off. The fork was wrong, but releasing an optimized version of the bench and not bumping the major version to 4 was wrong as well.

Leeghoofd and I agreed to get rid of the situation as quickly as possible. I will finish GPUPI 4 after the upcoming BenchMate release and I'm gunning for end of February.

Edited by _mat_

  • Crew
22 hours ago, _mat_ said:

 I remember the time well, I nearly turned my back on HWBOT and needed to take a few months off.

Good you did not. I think you saved the bot, atleast for benching AMD.

The separation was tricky. Difference between old and new was a bit too much. However, half part of benching GPU-PI is finding the right opencl dll.  I actually now found a very old one where a difference between 3.2 and 3.3 is not there and seem to be quite efficient. Scores are here:

https://hwbot.org/submission/4665246_strunkenbold_gpupi_for_cpu___1b_ryzen_9_3900x_1min_36sec_681ms
https://hwbot.org/submission/4665253_strunkenbold_gpupi_v3.3_for_cpu___1b_ryzen_9_3900x_1min_36sec_569ms

https://hwbot.org/submission/4665260_strunkenbold_gpupi_for_cpu___100m_ryzen_9_3900x_6sec_719ms
https://hwbot.org/submission/4665256_strunkenbold_gpupi_v3.3_for_cpu___100m_ryzen_9_3900x_6sec_663ms

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...