bartx Posted February 29, 2008 Share Posted February 29, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699557 - it's looks like a fake to me. Too low clocks for this score - only 750MHz on core. Score is also strange, because for 7900GS usually SM 2.0 score is higher than SM 3.0 score. Used 3dmark is Basic Edition, but I don't remember, that Basic shows score. Maybe this 3d mark is out of date? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew NeoForce Posted February 29, 2008 Crew Share Posted February 29, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699557 - it's looks like a fake to me. Too low clocks for this score - only 750MHz on core. Score is also strange, because for 7900GS usually SM 2.0 score is higher than SM 3.0 score. Used 3dmark is Basic Edition, but I don't remember, that Basic shows score. Maybe this 3d mark is out of date? fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepek86 Posted February 29, 2008 Share Posted February 29, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693178 it's brisbane in windsor http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642387 without cpuz; doesn't show what core http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=595162 without cpu-c http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673566 Total Phgisical Memory Allocated is 61757 but should be 61372 (cheat) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer Posted February 29, 2008 Share Posted February 29, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=705713 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=705711 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=705684 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Veld Posted February 29, 2008 Share Posted February 29, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625391 Wrong category - Prescott Cel 2.8 335 in Northwood Cel 2.8 category Please check and delete or move to http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_939 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 1, 2008 Share Posted March 1, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625391Wrong category - Prescott Cel 2.8 335 in Northwood Cel 2.8 category Please check and delete or move to http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_939 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 1, 2008 Share Posted March 1, 2008 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689123 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569839 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590180 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583802 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562420 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683937 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622755 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683943 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622756 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699336 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602819 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605558 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632447 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610865 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697094 orblink broken http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588495 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588503 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=522515 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=526500 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610307 Tnx for fixit! fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted March 1, 2008 Share Posted March 1, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610816 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=585786 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575658 wrong wprime Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kolian Posted March 1, 2008 Share Posted March 1, 2008 Thortons, submitted as Thoroughbreds, and some results with no proof:http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648978 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641115 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649000 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640766 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649026 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573592 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649193 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649028 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688350 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=592683 ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 1, 2008 Share Posted March 1, 2008 ^^^^^^ Partially fixed, need more information Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 1, 2008 Share Posted March 1, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626004http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696448 impossible score http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627180 no screen http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=525864 + http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695134 LOL http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627179 no screen checked and fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted March 1, 2008 Share Posted March 1, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686907 Athlon 3500+ in Sempron 3500+ rank 1. I see no screen. 2. It says AMD 64 3500+ in the description. Very few knows that semprons for s939 exist at all, and if this was really a sempron I guess the bencher would've written it in the forumpost to avoid confusion. 3. http://www.hwbot.org/listResults.do?cpuModelId=257&applicationId=3&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&limit=100 - as you can see the score fits betetr in this category, the time needed for the sempron is a little higher (same clocks as athlon) because of 256kb vs. 512kb cache. Compare with my spi1m score for sempron 3500+ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683265 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted March 1, 2008 Share Posted March 1, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706176 1024x768 2006mark old 3dmark: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641360 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657015 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600522 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657017 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640596 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602405 not default settings: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703368 no resolution on screen: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703841 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640592 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ServerManiac Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682041 No screen, just photo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepek86 Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701362 without checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678097 wrong category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670745 wrong version SPI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Patagonian Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573674 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677493 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630118 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581003 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677505 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621036 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692248 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581002 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677884 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630140 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648686 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675337 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678724 orb link broken http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606109 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=599398 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=522515 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=526500 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610816http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=585786 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575658 wrong wprime Checked, all is valid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701362 without checksumhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678097 wrong category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670745 wrong version SPI all fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682041 No screen, just photo fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 ? fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crazy666 Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650625 CPU-Z and ClockGen are not started, they are painted. The frequency, showned by Wprime, is not the same in CPU-Z one !!! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650627 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650623 ^,the same, but in sp1m and pifast.. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648976 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648975 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648974 torthon posted in thoroughbred http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=537915 no proof, bad link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nikodemus Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 Doesn't seem to be Duron: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575733 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575739 Same story with this?? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575707 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650625CPU-Z and ClockGen are not started, they are painted. The frequency, showned by Wprime, is not the same in CPU-Z one !!! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650627 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650623 ^,the same, but in sp1m and pifast.. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648976 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648975 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648974 torthon posted in thoroughbred http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=537915 no proof, bad link a, not painted or cheat - Multimonitoring and AeroStyle by Vistamizer for XP there gives Video to show the Aktive Window Bug, diffrent Speed comes from updatly CPU Z Speed b, Moved c, older than one Year - link can be lost. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted March 2, 2008 Share Posted March 2, 2008 Doesn't seem to be Duron:http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575733 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575739 Same story with this?? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575707 a, moved - multi say Sempron 3000 ( XP ) b, older version log time it was valit and older than one year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thuongkiet82 Posted March 3, 2008 Share Posted March 3, 2008 Wrong category: 3x EVGA 8800GTX in 2-way SLI category. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=704265 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts