bartx Posted February 29, 2008 Posted February 29, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699557 - it's looks like a fake to me. Too low clocks for this score - only 750MHz on core. Score is also strange, because for 7900GS usually SM 2.0 score is higher than SM 3.0 score. Used 3dmark is Basic Edition, but I don't remember, that Basic shows score. Maybe this 3d mark is out of date?
Crew NeoForce Posted February 29, 2008 Crew Posted February 29, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699557 - it's looks like a fake to me. Too low clocks for this score - only 750MHz on core. Score is also strange, because for 7900GS usually SM 2.0 score is higher than SM 3.0 score. Used 3dmark is Basic Edition, but I don't remember, that Basic shows score. Maybe this 3d mark is out of date? fixed
Pepek86 Posted February 29, 2008 Posted February 29, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693178 it's brisbane in windsor http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642387 without cpuz; doesn't show what core http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=595162 without cpu-c http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=673566 Total Phgisical Memory Allocated is 61757 but should be 61372 (cheat)
Narmer Posted February 29, 2008 Posted February 29, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=705713 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=705711 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=705684
Veld Posted February 29, 2008 Posted February 29, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625391 Wrong category - Prescott Cel 2.8 335 in Northwood Cel 2.8 category Please check and delete or move to http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_939
demiurg Posted March 1, 2008 Posted March 1, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625391Wrong category - Prescott Cel 2.8 335 in Northwood Cel 2.8 category Please check and delete or move to http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_939 fixed
demiurg Posted March 1, 2008 Posted March 1, 2008 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689123 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569839 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590180 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583802 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562420 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683937 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622755 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683943 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622756 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=699336 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602819 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605558 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632447 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610865 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697094 orblink broken http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588495 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588503 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=522515 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=526500 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610307 Tnx for fixit! fixed
71proste Posted March 1, 2008 Posted March 1, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610816 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=585786 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575658 wrong wprime
Kolian Posted March 1, 2008 Posted March 1, 2008 Thortons, submitted as Thoroughbreds, and some results with no proof:http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648978 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641115 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649000 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640766 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649026 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573592 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649193 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649028 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688350 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=592683 ?
demiurg Posted March 1, 2008 Posted March 1, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626004http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696448 impossible score http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627180 no screen http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=525864 + http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695134 LOL http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627179 no screen checked and fixed
knopflerbruce Posted March 1, 2008 Posted March 1, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686907 Athlon 3500+ in Sempron 3500+ rank 1. I see no screen. 2. It says AMD 64 3500+ in the description. Very few knows that semprons for s939 exist at all, and if this was really a sempron I guess the bencher would've written it in the forumpost to avoid confusion. 3. http://www.hwbot.org/listResults.do?cpuModelId=257&applicationId=3&filterUser=true&filterBlocked=true&limit=100 - as you can see the score fits betetr in this category, the time needed for the sempron is a little higher (same clocks as athlon) because of 256kb vs. 512kb cache. Compare with my spi1m score for sempron 3500+ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683265
gradus Posted March 1, 2008 Posted March 1, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=706176 1024x768 2006mark old 3dmark: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641360 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657015 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600522 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=657017 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640596 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602405 not default settings: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703368 no resolution on screen: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=703841 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640592
ServerManiac Posted March 2, 2008 Posted March 2, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682041 No screen, just photo
Pepek86 Posted March 2, 2008 Posted March 2, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701362 without checksum http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678097 wrong category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670745 wrong version SPI
Patagonian Posted March 2, 2008 Posted March 2, 2008 resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573674 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677493 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630118 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581003 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677505 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621036 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692248 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581002 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677884 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630140 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648686 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=675337 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678724 orb link broken http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606109 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=599398 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=522515 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=526500
demiurg Posted March 2, 2008 Posted March 2, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610816http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=585786 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575658 wrong wprime Checked, all is valid.
Bwanasoft Posted March 2, 2008 Posted March 2, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=701362 without checksumhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678097 wrong category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=670745 wrong version SPI all fixed
demiurg Posted March 2, 2008 Posted March 2, 2008 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682041 No screen, just photo fixed
Crazy666 Posted March 2, 2008 Posted March 2, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650625 CPU-Z and ClockGen are not started, they are painted. The frequency, showned by Wprime, is not the same in CPU-Z one !!! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650627 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650623 ^,the same, but in sp1m and pifast.. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648976 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648975 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648974 torthon posted in thoroughbred http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=537915 no proof, bad link
Nikodemus Posted March 2, 2008 Posted March 2, 2008 Doesn't seem to be Duron: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575733 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575739 Same story with this?? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575707
Bwanasoft Posted March 2, 2008 Posted March 2, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650625CPU-Z and ClockGen are not started, they are painted. The frequency, showned by Wprime, is not the same in CPU-Z one !!! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650627 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650623 ^,the same, but in sp1m and pifast.. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648976 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648975 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648974 torthon posted in thoroughbred http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=537915 no proof, bad link a, not painted or cheat - Multimonitoring and AeroStyle by Vistamizer for XP there gives Video to show the Aktive Window Bug, diffrent Speed comes from updatly CPU Z Speed b, Moved c, older than one Year - link can be lost.
Bwanasoft Posted March 2, 2008 Posted March 2, 2008 Doesn't seem to be Duron:http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575733 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575739 Same story with this?? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575707 a, moved - multi say Sempron 3000 ( XP ) b, older version log time it was valit and older than one year
thuongkiet82 Posted March 3, 2008 Posted March 3, 2008 Wrong category: 3x EVGA 8800GTX in 2-way SLI category. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=704265
Recommended Posts